Benchmarking and Scoring State Performance Sample Clauses

Benchmarking and Scoring State Performance. Benchmarks for individual measures will be determined through an analysis of national and State-specific data.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Benchmarking and Scoring State Performance. Benchmarks for individual measures will be determined through an analysis of national and State-specific data. CMS and the State will establish benchmarks for the Demonstration based on the following principles: CMS will set benchmark levels for core measures. Once benchmark levels are set, CMS will provide the State with no less than 30 days to review the benchmark levels, the methodological considerations, and the data supporting any baseline calculations, as provided in a written notice. For State-specific process and Demonstration measures, the State will provide CMS with recommended benchmarks and supporting analysis; the State will provide CMS with no less than 30 days to review the recommended benchmark levels; CMS will approve the final benchmarks for these measures. All benchmarks will consider the population served under the Demonstration, changes in the population, and for measures in which the baseline is set from pre-Demonstration experience, the extent to which pre-Demonstration experience data is reflective of the Demonstration population. Benchmarks will include minimum achievement levels, improvement relative to those levels, or both (i.e., either/or). For claims-based measures, where it is feasible to assess experience prior to the start of the Demonstration, improvement-focused benchmarking will be based on improvement from the pre-Demonstration baseline. For measures for which the baseline cannot be based on pre-Demonstration experience, improvement-focused benchmarking will be based on improvement from the reporting period baseline. For the Patient Activation Measure (XXX), improvement-focused benchmarking will be based on positive average XXX score changes for beneficiaries who were initially least activated. For the homelessness measure (C.4), the benchmark value will be informed by consideration of pre-pandemic values, given the impact of the temporary COVID-related eviction moratorium on rates of homelessness in DY 7 (2020) and DY 8 (2021). Given that the State already has achieved one of the lowest rates of institutional long term care placement in the country, the two long-term services and supports State-specific demonstration measures will allow credit for maintaining or improving performance over time. The State may earn credit on measures in two ways: If the State meets the established benchmark on an individual measure; or If the State meets the established goal for closing the gap between their performance in the 12 months ...
Sample 1

Related to Benchmarking and Scoring State Performance

  • Registry Performance Specifications Registry Performance Specifications for operation of the TLD will be as set forth in Specification 10 attached hereto (“Specification 10”). Registry Operator shall comply with such Performance Specifications and, for a period of at least one (1) year, shall keep technical and operational records sufficient to evidence compliance with such specifications for each calendar year during the Term.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • COORDINATE PERFORMANCE 2.02.1 Contractor shall coordinate its performance with the Director and other persons that the Director designates. Contractor shall promptly inform the Director and other person(s) of all significant events relating to the performance of this Agreement.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE Agencies shall report any vendor failure to perform according to the requirements of this contract on Complaint to Vendor, form PUR 7017. Should the vendor fail to correct the problem within a prescribed period of time, then form PUR 7029, Request for Assistance, is to be filed with this office.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • Assessment of Performance The assignment of a teacher to a TLS position will be subject to review by the school district’s administration at least annually. The first review must be completed no later than five (5) work days before the beginning of the transfer process. The review shall include peer feedback on the effectiveness of the teacher’s performance of duty specific to the teacher’s TLS position. A teacher who completes an assignment in a TLS position may apply for assignment to a new TLS position.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopts or introduces for the Employer, management and municipal staff of the Employer.

  • Standard and Manner of Performance Contractor shall perform its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the highest standards of care, skill and diligence in Contractor’s industry, trade, or profession. Not Exclusive. Contractor is not guaranteed any work except as expressly stated herein, and this Agreement does not create an exclusive contract for the Work.

  • Standards of Performance A. The standard of care for all professional and related services performed or furnished by Contractor under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of Contractor’s profession practicing under similar conditions and circumstances and in a similar locality.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.