Board of Educ Sample Clauses

Board of Educ. 331 F.3d 342 (2d Cir. 2003); Bronx Household of Faith v. Board of Educ., 492 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2007). The United States also has participated in several other cases addressing these issues, including Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch., 533 U.S. 98 (2001).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Board of Educ. 492 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2007) (Bronx Household III). Judge Xxxxxxxxx would have reversed the district court on the merits. Judge Xxxxx would not have reached the merits, but agreed the district court’s decision had to be reversed because he concluded the issue decided was not yet ripe for review and might never be. Judge Xxxxxx would have affirmed. After remand, the Bronx Household applied for permission to continue using the school building. Pursuant to its revised policy, the Board denied that
Sample 1Sample 2
Board of Educ of Whitley County, 000 X.X.0x 784, 787 (Xx.Xxx.,1990) held that a superintendent cannot make a contract for a board acting without proper authority from the board. . A non-resident student agreement also has the consequence of reducing SEEK money received by one district and authorizing application of resources in the other district to educate students to whom no statutory duty to educate is owed otherwise. OAG 92-65 opined that a local board of education, not the superintendent, has authority over the expenditure of school funds and control over all public school property in the district. This hearing officer believes that both boards genuinely intended to delegate authority to their respective superintendents to enter into an agreement as they did. However, to act lawfully, boards must act through voting. Lone Jack Graded School Dist.
Sample 1
Board of Educ of Whitley County, 000 X.X.0x 784, 786 (Xx.Xxx.,1990) addresses the issues of implied contracts, ratification of contracts, and estoppel through accepting the benefits of a contract: Public agencies cannot become liable under implied contracts. Xxxx Fiscal Court
Sample 1
Board of Educ of the City of Norwalk, 83 A.2d 482 (1951). Xxxxx, X. 1976. Why they organize. In Education and collective bargaining: Readings in policy and research, ed. A. M. Xxxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxxx, pp. 12-21. Berkeley, CA: XxXxxxxxxx Publishing Corp. Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Associa- tion, 555 U.S. 353 (2009), on remand sub nom. Pocatello Educ. Ass’n x. Xxxxxxxx, 561 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2009). Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, X.X., Ed.D., is Panzer Chair in Education and adjunct profes- sor of law at the University of Dayton (Ohio), and chair of ASBO’s Legal Aspects Committee. Email: crusso1@ xxxxxxx.xxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Ph.D., is an associ- ate professor and director of the Office of Educational Services in the School of Education and Allied Professions at the University of Dayton (Ohio). Email: xxxxxxx0@xxxxxxx.xxx xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx SCHOOL BUSINESS AFFAIRS | NOVEMBER 2012 37 Professional expertise and powerful DI System deliver solutions to enrollment challenges: • Easy to use, web-based DI system makes analysis easy • Reality-based 10 year district and school by grade enrollment projections • Efficiency calculators instantly show the effects of enrollment on budgeting, staffing and facilities • Boundary change / Closing school scenarios made easy • Relevant community demographics to improve student support • Integrated tools & strategies to increase student enrollment • MySchoolLocator™ with bus stops and schedules for parents to look up assigned schools • Projections for Pre-Kindergarten & Transitional programs optionally available INCREASE EFFICIENCY REDUCE COSTS Enrollment Impact Specialists 000-000-0000 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Boundary Changes? Declining Enrollment?
Sample 1
Board of Educ. Of Twp. High Sch. Dist. 211, 486 F.3d 279, 283 (7th Cir. 2007), cited in Xxxxxx x. Xxxxx, 752 F.3d 1079, 1101 (7th Cir. 2014).
Sample 1
Board of Educ. Of Twp. High Sch. Dist. 211, 486 F.3d 279, 283 (7th Cir. 2007) (res judicata claim preclusion case based on prior settlement), cited in Xxxxxx x. Xxxxx, 752 F.3d 1079, 1101 (7th Cir. 2014).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Board of Educ

  • Board of Education a) If the unit member and the Association are not satisfied with the decision at Stage 2, the Grievance Committee will file an appeal in writing with the Board of Education within fifteen (15) school days after receiving the decision at Stage 2. The official grievance record maintained by the Superintendent of Schools shall be available for the use of the Board of Education.

  • BOARD OF EDUCATION RIGHTS A. The Board, on its own behalf and on behalf of the electors of the district, hereby retains and reserves unto itself, without limitation, all powers, rights, authority, duties, and responsibilities conferred upon and invested in it by the laws and the Constitution of the State of Michigan, and/or the management and control of school properties, facilities, grades and courses of instruction, materials used for instruction, and the selection, direction, transfer, promotion, demotion, discipline or dismissal of all personnel.

  • Level Three - Board of Education If the aggrieved person is not satisfied with the disposition of his grievance at Level Two, or if no decision has been rendered within ten (10) school days after the presentation of the grievance to the Superintendent, he may file the grievance in writing with the Association within five (5) school days after the decision of Level Two or ten (10) school days after the grievance was presented, whichever is sooner. Within five (5) school days after receiving the written grievance, the Association shall refer it to the Board of Education through the Business Administrator/Board Secretary.

  • RIGHTS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION The Board of Education, on its own behalf and on behalf of the electors of the School district, hereby retains and reserves unto itself all powers, rights, authority, duties, and responsibilities conferred upon and vested in it by the laws and the constitution of the State of Michigan, and of the United States, including, but without limiting, the generality of the foregoing, the right:

  • Board of Education Authority Pursuant to its duties under Article X, Section 3, of the Hawaii State Constitution, the BOE has the power to formulate statewide educational policy. The School shall only be subject to BOE policies expressly identified by the BOE as applying to charter schools. If there is any conflict between an applicable BOE policy and a provision in this Contract, the BOE policy shall control.

  • Department of Education The School shall administer all student testing as required by applicable federal and state laws, rules, policies, and procedures.

  • MILWAUKEE BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS AUTHORITY It is hereby agreed and declared that this Contract is made expressly subject to the powers granted to said Milwaukee Board of School Directors, by the applicable provisions of Chapter 119 and Sec.

  • Board “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

  • Senior Management and Board of Directors 1. A Member State shall not require that a juridical person of that Member State appoint to senior management positions, natural persons of any particular nationality.

  • Board of Directors The Board of Directors of the Company is comprised of the persons set forth under the heading of the Pricing Prospectus and the Prospectus captioned “Management.” The qualifications of the persons serving as board members and the overall composition of the board comply with the Exchange Act, the Exchange Act Regulations, the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder (the “Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act”) applicable to the Company and the listing rules of the Exchange. At least one member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined under Regulation S-K and the listing rules of the Exchange. In addition, at least a majority of the persons serving on the Board of Directors qualify as “independent,” as defined under the listing rules of the Exchange.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.