CAEP Evidence Review of Standard Sample Clauses

CAEP Evidence Review of Standard. 1/A.1. Evidence for the CAEP Evidence Review of Standard 1/A.1 process is developed through the analysis of an EPP’s outcome assessment data aligned to specialty licensure area standards delineated in CAEP Standard R1, Component RA1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard A1, Component RA1.2 (Advanced). Evidence from the EPP’s internal assessment may be used by the state to determine its alignment with state required standards in the respective area(s) of licensure to demonstrate candidates’ ability to apply content and pedagogical knowledge in the area of licensure.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CAEP Evidence Review of Standard. 1/A.1. Evidence for the CAEP Evidence Review of Standard 1 process is developed through the analysis of an EPP’s outcome assessment data aligned to specialty licensure area standards delineated in CAEP Standard 1, Component R1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard A.1, Component A1.2 (Advanced). CAEP’s Evidence Review of Standard 1/A.1 provides information to the State on both the alignment of evidence with state standards in an area of licensure and the disaggregated results that may be used for internal review of programs to demonstrate candidates’ ability to apply content and pedagogical knowledge in the area of licensure. 4.10.2.1. XXXx select this option if they do not want their programs or a program to be nationally recognized by a SPA or if one or more programs do not have a SPA and the EPP wants to keep the program registered and active on NYSED’s Inventory of Registered programs. 4.10.2.2. When selecting this option, XXXx are required to address specific ways in which they use subject/certification data for continuous improvement, showing evidence of using the results from Content Specialty Tests (CSTs). Other measures of proficiency to make program improvements may also be presented.
Sample 1Sample 2
CAEP Evidence Review of Standard. 1. Evidence for the CAEP Evidence Review of Standard 1 process is developed through the analysis of an EPP's outcome assessment data aligned to those standards delineated in CAEP Standard 1.3. CAEP's Evidence Review of Standard 1 provides information to the State on both the alignment of evidence with state standards and the disaggregated results. The State will decide how to use this review of evidence in its decision making.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to CAEP Evidence Review of Standard

  • Periodic Review of Costs of Environmental Compliance In the ordinary course of its business, the Company conducts a periodic review of the effect of Environmental Laws on the business, operations and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, in the course of which it identifies and evaluates associated costs and liabilities (including, without limitation, any capital or operating expenditures required for clean-up, closure of properties or compliance with Environmental Laws or any permit, license or approval, any related constraints on operating activities and any potential liabilities to third parties). On the basis of such review and the amount of its established reserves, the Company has reasonably concluded that such associated costs and liabilities would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Review of insurance requirements The Security Trustee shall be entitled to review the requirements of this Clause 13 from time to time in order to take account of any changes in circumstances after the date of this Agreement which are, in the opinion of the Majority Lenders, significant and capable of affecting the Owners or the Ships and their insurance (including, without limitation, changes in the availability or the cost of insurance coverage or the risks to which the Owners may be subject), and may appoint insurance consultants in relation to this review at the cost of the Borrower.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, inspection or investigation of the Grant Agreement and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency. B. As part of the services, Grantee must provide to HHS upon request a copy of those portions of Grantee's and its Subcontractors' internal audit reports relating to the services and Deliverables provided to the State under the Grant Agreement. C. Grantee shall include the requirement to provide to System Agency (and any of its duly authorized federal, state, or local authorities) internal audit reports related to this Grant Agreement in any Subcontract it awards. Upon request by System Agency, Grantee shall enforce this requirement against its Subcontractor. Further, Grantee shall include in any Subcontract it awards a requirement that all Subcontractor Subcontracts must also include these provisions.

  • Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Prior to the Commercial Operation Date, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall test the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades and Developer shall test the Large Generating Facility and the Developer Attachment Facilities to ensure their safe and reliable operation. Similar testing may be required after initial operation. Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each make any modifications to its facilities that are found to be necessary as a result of such testing. Developer shall bear the cost of all such testing and modifications. Developer shall generate test energy at the Large Generating Facility only if it has arranged for the injection of such test energy in accordance with NYISO procedures.

  • Conformance to Applicable Requirements All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

  • INSURANCE REQUIREMENT REVIEW Grantee agrees to periodic review of insurance requirements by Agency under this Agreement and to provide updated requirements as mutually agreed upon by Grantee and Agency.

  • Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedures shall not contravene the Canada Labour Code, the Canadian Human Rights Code, or the Collective Agreement, and an allegation of such contravention is subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Credentialing Requirements Registry Operator, through the facilitation of the CZDA Provider, will request each user to provide it with information sufficient to correctly identify and locate the user. Such user information will include, without limitation, company name, contact name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, email address and IP address.

  • Design Criteria and Standards All Projects/Services shall be performed in accordance with instructions, criteria and standards set forth by the Director.

  • Rectification of Safety Hazard Where, because of the existence of a safety hazard, a site has been stopped for a defined period of time and Employees sent off site by agreement between Site Managers and any combination of Union Official/s, Health and Safety Committee, those people who remain on site to do rectification work will be paid at the rate of double time for all such work.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!