Call for Competition Award criteria Sample Clauses

Call for Competition Award criteria. Some or all of the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Suppliers' General Tender Response in the first and any subsequent evaluation stages, with the exception of the final stage, of the evaluation methodology, with percentage weightings from 0% to 100% to be set by the Contracting Body conducting the Call for Competition: Criteria Number Award Criteria Percentage Weighting to be set by the Contracting Body conducting the Call for Competition 1 Technical merit 2 Delivery approach (including delivery period) 3 Implementation approach 4 Scalability The Contracting Body shall apply the criteria specified in the table below for a single stage evaluation methodology, or the final stage of a multi-stage evaluation methodology: Award Criteria Weighting Price 25% or more (up to 75%) Quality 25% or more (up to 75%) Some or all of the following sub-criteria may be applied to the Services set out in the Suppliers' General Tender Response for a single stage evaluation methodology, or the final stage of a multi-stage evaluation methodology, with percentage weightings set in accordance with paragraph 2.2 of this Schedule 4: Criteria Reference Award Criteria – to be defined by the Contracting Body conducting the Call for Competition Percentage Weightings – to be set in accordance with paragraph 2.2 Price A Cost effectiveness B Implementation cost C Running cost D Exit cost E Whole life costs Quality F Technical assistance G After sales service H Aesthetic and functional characteristics I Environmental characteristics J Delivery date and delivery period K Period of completion L Service M Transition N Legal/Commercial O Social value P Implementation plan Q Risk and risk management DPS SCHEDULE 6: KEY SUB-CONTRACTORS
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Call for Competition Award criteria. 4.17.1 The Customer will evaluate the DPS Suppliers proposal against the following criteria to determine which of the DPS Suppliers provides the most economically advantageous proposal from the perspective of the Customer. For the avoidance of doubt the most economically advantageous proposal will not be the lowest price solution: Criteria Percentage Weightings Quality 60% - 95% Price 5% - 40%
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Call for Competition Award criteria

  • Further Competition Award Criteria 1. Where a Contracting Body may require Suppliers to develop proposals or a solution in respect of its Statement of Requirements or need to amend or refine the terms of the Call-Off Contract to reflect its Statement of Requirements to the extent permitted by and in accordance with applicable laws (including procurement laws and all necessary guidance), the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Service Providers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure:

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Supplementation of Compensation Award ‌ If an employee is prevented from performing the employee's regular work with the City on account of an occupational accident that is recognized by the Workers' Compensation Board as compensable within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Act, the City will supplement the award made by the Workers' Compensation Board for loss of wages to the employee by such an amount that the award of the Workers' Compensation Board for loss of wages (excluding non- economic loss payment), together with the supplementation by the City, will equal 100% of the employee's regular net wage (gross pay less statutory deductions, union dues and required benefit plan contributions). The said supplementation shall not be payable to any employee entitled to compensation after pension age if such an employee is entitled to an unreduced pension as provided under the Local Authorities Pension Plan or after the full age of 65 years if such an employee is not entitled to a pension. Subject to the foregoing limitation, the procedure to be followed in operating this policy shall be as follows:

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Performance Provisions A. Monitoring

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • Performance Orders A Performance Order:

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.