Canadian Union of Public Employees. Local 474
Canadian Union of Public Employees. Local 389, being an organization of the employees of the Corporation of the District of North Vancouver engaged in street, water, sewer, general maintenance and clerical work, (hereinafter called "the Union")
Canadian Union of Public Employees. AND ITS LOCAL 229 The Employer agrees to provide a fair and consistent policy for rehabilitating employees who have been injured on the job. The Employer and the Union recognize the benefits of a formal rehabilitation program. The Company therefore undertakes to provide meaningful employment for both permanently and temporarily disabled employees thereby returning valuable human resources, benefits and productivity to the Employer on behalf of the employees. The parties agree to co-operate in the establishment of a Modified Work Program through participation in a Joint Health and Safety Committee. The Union agrees to inform its members of the benefits of co-operating in a Modified Work Program. The parties further agree that the Modified Work Program will include the following guidelines:
Canadian Union of Public Employees. LOCAL NO. called "the PARTY OF THE SECOND PART.
Canadian Union of Public Employees. Local No. 882, 2008 SKCA 121 at paras 3 and 37, the standard of review in the judicial review of interpretation of contract provision is reasonableness. In Council of Canadians with Disabilities v VIA rail Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 15 at paras 96-98, statutory interpretation by highly specialized tribunals functioning within their expertise is an exception to the correctness standard. The rationale for this exception is that the tribunal is better equipped than the appellate court to interpret and apply its home statute within the legislative scheme.
Canadian Union of Public Employees. Local 4365 (Badger Grievance, supra, at paragraph 12-13. [14] There is also an assumption that the parties do not intend their language to be redundant or superfluous. Accordingly, meaning must be attributed to all words that the parties have used, see Re City of St. John’s and Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 569, supra, at page 318. [15] A proper analysis should also include interpreting the language harmoniously and in a reconcilable fashion to ensure compatibility and avoiding conflict, see United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union, Local 401 v. Real Canadian Superstore, supra, at paragraph 20.
Canadian Union of Public Employees. And its Local and THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES and its LOCAL between INC. and THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES and its LOCAL between INC. and and its LOCAL And it LOCAL And And it LOCAL
Canadian Union of Public Employees. Any notice given under this Agreement shall be deemed given and received as of the business day immediately following the date of mailing.
Canadian Union of Public Employees. Collective
Canadian Union of Public Employees. AND ITS LOCAL 229 It is the purpose of both parties of this Agreement:
