Common use of CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation Clause in Contracts

CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation. If a CAP is required by the Authorizer, the School shall develop the CAP along with a proposed timeline for correcting the alleged deficiencies and submit the CAP to the authorizer for review, comment, and approval. The Authorizer may require the school to review and revise the plan if it is not effective in remedying the deficiency.

CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation. ‌ If a CAP is required by the Authorizer, the School shall develop the CAP along with a proposed timeline for correcting the alleged deficiencies and submit the CAP to the authorizer for review, comment, and approval. The Authorizer may require the school to review and revise the plan if it is not effective in remedying the deficiency.

CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation. If a CAP is required by the Authorizer, the School shall develop the CAP along with a proposed timeline for correcting the alleged deficiencies and submit the CAP to the 54 Section 22-8B-12(F) NMSA 1978 55 Section 61-1-1 et. seq. NMSA 1978 and associated rules and regulations authorizer for review, comment, and approval. The Authorizer may require the school to review and revise the plan if it is not effective in remedying the deficiency.

CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation. If a CAP is required by the Authorizer, the School shall develop the CAP along with a proposed timeline for correcting the alleged deficiencies and submit the CAP to the 52 Section 22-8B-12(F) NMSA 1978 53 Section 61-1-1 et. seq. NMSA 1978 and associated rules and regulations authorizer for review, comment, and approval. The Authorizer may require the school to review and revise the plan if it is not effective in remedying the deficiency.