Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation Sample Clauses

Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. If, based on a performance review conducted by the Authorizer, the School’s organization, academic or financial performance appears unsatisfactory or the Authorizer believes there to be a breach of this Contract not warranting immediate revocation, the Authorizer may initiate the process to implement a corrective action plan. The Authorizer shall notify the School of the unsatisfactory review and provide a reasonable opportunity for the School to remedy the Authorizer’s concerns.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. If, based on a performance review conducted by the Authorizer, the School’s organization, academic or financial performance appears unsatisfactory or the Authorizer believes there to be a breach of this Contract not warranting immediate revocation, the Authorizer may initiate the process to implement a corrective action plan. The Authorizer shall notify the School of the unsatisfactory review and provide a reasonable opportunity for the School to remedy the Authorizer’s concerns. (a) Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance (NUP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation. The Authorizer shall provide written notice to the School no more than 10 business days after determining that there is unsatisfactory performance related to the School’s organization, the School’s academic or financial performance appears unsatisfactory, or the Authorizer believes there to be a breach of this Contract not warranting immediate revocation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. 3227 (a) Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance (NUP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation 3227 (b) Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation 3227 (c) Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation 3227 (d) CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation 3227 (e) Effect of Successful CAP Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation 3227 Article XII. School Closure. 3227
Sample 1Sample 2
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. 55 (a) Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance (NUP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation 56 (b) Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation. 56 (c) Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation. 56 (d) CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation 56 (e) Effect of Successful CAP Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation. 57 Article XII. School Closure. 57 Article XIII. General Provisions 57 Section 13.01 Order of Precedence. 57 Section 13.02 Amendments 58 (a) Terms Requiring Amendment 58 (b) Authority to Amend 58 (c) Process. 58 Section 13.03 Merger. 59 Section 13.04 Non-Assignment 59 Section 13.05 Governing Law and Enforceability 59 Section 13.06 Severability 59 Section 13.07 Changes in Law, Rules, Procedures or Forms 60 Section 13.08 No Third Party Beneficiary 60 Section 13.09 No Waiver 60
Sample 1
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. If, based on a performance review conducted by the Authorizer, the School’s organization, academic or financial performance appears unsatisfactory or the Authorizer believes there to be a breach of this Contract not warranting immediate revocation, the Authorizer may initiate the process to implement a corrective action 53 Section 22-8B-12(J) NMSA 1978. 54 Section 22-8B-12(F) NMSA 1978 55 Section 61-1-1 et. seq. NMSA 1978 and associated rules and regulations
Sample 1
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. 28 (a) Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance (NUP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation 28 (b) Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation 28
Sample 1
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. 32 (a) Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance (NUP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation 32 (b) Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation. 32 (c) Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation. 32 (d) CAP Development for actions not warranting immediate revocation 32 (e) Effect of Successful CAP Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation. 33 Article XII. School Closure. 33 Article XIII. General Provisions 33 Section 13.01 Order of Precedence. 33 Section 13.02 Amendments 33 (a) Terms Requiring Amendment 33 (b) Authority to Amend 33 (c) Process. 33 Section 13.03 Merger. 34 Section 13.04 Non-Assignment 34 Section 13.05 Governing Law and Enforceability 34 Section 13.06 Severability 34 Section 13.07 Changes in Law, Rules, Procedures or Forms 34 Section 13.08 No Third Party Beneficiary 34 Section 13.09 No Waiver 35 Section 13.10 Authorized Signatories 35 This charter contract (“Contract”), effective the 1st day of July 2019 is made and entered into between the Albuquerque Public Schools Board of Education (“Authorizer”) and The New America School – New Mexico, a public charter school (“School”). Collectively, these entities are referred to as the “Parties.” The Secretary of the New Mexico Public Education Department is authorized to hear appeals regarding this Contract from the Parties (“Secretary”)i.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation. If, based on a performance review conducted by the Authorizer, the School’s organization, academic or financial performance appears unsatisfactory or the Authorizer believes there to be a breach of this Contract not warranting immediate revocation, the Authorizer may initiate the process to implement a corrective action plan. The Authorizer shall notify the School of the unsatisfactory review and provide a reasonable opportunity for the School to remedy the Authorizer’s concerns. (a) Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance (NUP) for actions not warranting immediate revocation. (b) Response for actions not warranting immediate revocation.
Sample 1

Related to Corrective Action Required by Authorizer for Actions Not Warranting Immediate Revocation

  • Required Confidentiality Claim Form This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS provides the required TIPS Confidentiality Claim Form in the "Attachments" section of this solicitation. Vendor must execute this form by either signing and waiving any confidentiality claim, or designating portions of Vendor's proposal confidential. If Vendor considers any portion of Vendor's proposal to be confidential and not subject to public disclosure pursuant to Chapter 552 Texas Gov’t Code or other law(s) and orders, Vendor must have identified the claimed confidential materials through proper execution of the Confidentiality Claim Form. If TIPS receives a public information act or similar request, any responsive documentation not deemed confidential by you in this manner will be automatically released. For Vendor documents deemed confidential by you in this manner, TIPS will follow procedures of controlling statute(s) regarding any claim of confidentiality and shall not be liable for any release of information required by law, including Attorney General determination and opinion. Notwithstanding any other Vendor designation of Vendor's proposal as confidential or proprietary, Vendor’s submission of this proposal constitutes Vendor’s agreement that proper execution of the required TIPS Confidentiality Claim Form is the only way to assert any portion of Vendor's proposal as confidential.

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the District will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the District’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis. In its Corrective Action Plan, the District will acknowledge that if all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Audit is not removed or made accessible on a timely basis, the District will be in violation of this Agreement, Section 504, and Title II and OCR may initiate administrative enforcement or judicial proceedings to enforce the specific terms and obligations of the Agreement.

  • Renewal Notice; Notification of Changes Subject to governing law, XOOM can renew this Agreement with new or revised Terms. XOOM will send you written notice at least (30) days before the end of the Term. The notice will specify the date by which you must advise XOOM if you do not want to renew your Agreement. If you do not advise XOOM by the specified date, this Agreement will automatically renew at the fixed rate or variable rate then in effect in accordance with the notice. XOOM reserves the right, with fifteen (15) days’ notice, to amend this Agreement to adjust its service to accommodate any change in regulations, law, tariff or other change in procedure required by any third party that may affect XOOM’s ability to continue to serve you under this Agreement.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION The undersigned (authorized official signing for the contracting organization) certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that the contractor, defined as the primary participant in accordance with 45 CFR Part 76, and its principals: are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal Department or agency have not within a 3-year period preceding this contract been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in Section 2 of this certification; and have not within a 3-year period preceding this contract had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. Should the Contractor or Subrecipient not be able to provide this certification, an explanation as to why should be placed after the assurances page in the contract. The contractor agrees by signing this contract that it will include, without modification, the clause above certification in all lower tier covered transactions (i.e., transactions with sub-grantees and/or contractors) and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions in accordance with 45 CFR Part 76.

  • Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion First Tier Participants: a. The prospective first tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (1) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (2) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (3) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(2) of this certification; and (4) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. b. Where the prospective participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!