Challenges to Participation in NYISO Governance Sample Clauses

Challenges to Participation in NYISO Governance. In order to ensure the integrity of its governance structure, the NYISO proposes to amend the ISO Agreement to provide a procedure for challenging a Party’s eligibility to participate in a particular sector or subsector. As proposed, Section 2.02 will require a new Party to the ISO Agreement to certify that it satisfies the criteria for participation in the sector and subsector in which it wishes to participate. The NYISO will then notify all Parties of the contents of the certification. Any Party may challenge the new Party’s eligibility to participate in a particular sector or subsector by filing a petition with the NYISO Board. The NYISO Board may also initiate a challenge on its own motion. The Party whose status is being challenged will have an opportunity to respond, and all interested Parties will be given an opportunity to comment. The final decision on the petition will be made by the NYISO Board in its discretion. Pending that decision, the President of the NYISO or the NYISO Board may prohibit the Party whose status is being challenged from voting on matters before the NYISO Committees. The NYISO believes that this new procedure will enforce the NYISO’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of its governance system and allow the Parties to ensure proper participation in the NYISO.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Challenges to Participation in NYISO Governance

  • PARTICIPATION IN SIMILAR ACTIVITIES 1. Parties are not prevented by this MoU from participating and activities similar to those described in this document with third parties. There is no obligation to disclose any similar activity to the other party. However, when considered of mutual benefit, both parties are encouraged to involve the other party in similar activities to the goal of disseminating the knowledge about XXX.xx.

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • DISQUALIFICATION FOR PAST PERFORMANCE AND FINDINGS OF NON RESPONSIBILITY Bidder may be disqualified from receiving awards if Bidder, or anyone in Bidder’s employment, has previously failed to perform satisfactorily in connection with public Bidding or contracts or is deemed non- responsible.

  • Non-Grievability No dispute over a claim for any benefits extended by this Health and Welfare Fund shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Determinations and Actions by the Board of Directors All actions, calculations and determinations (including all omissions with respect to the foregoing) which are done or made by the Board of Directors in good faith pursuant to this Agreement, shall not subject the Board of Directors to any liability to the holders of the Rights.

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • PROCEDURE FOR GRIEVANCES AFFECTING A GROUP OF EMPLOYEES The Union may elect to file a grievance on behalf of two or more employees. The facts and issues of the grievance must be the same.

  • District’s Evaluation of Consultant and Consultant’s Employees and/or Subcontractors The District may evaluate the Consultant in any way the District is entitled pursuant to applicable law. The District’s evaluation may include, without limitation:

  • Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation A) At the start of each school year, the superintendent, principal or designee shall conduct a meeting for Educators and Evaluators focused substantially on educator evaluation. The superintendent, principal or designee shall:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.