Charge Assessment Sample Clauses

Charge Assessment. Complainants will be given an in-depth interview within 30 days from the date the complaint is filed with the Division. The interview will cover each specific harm suffered by the Complainant and the dates of occurrence. For each harm suffered, the Complainant must be able to specify relevant incidents to show specific intent or different treatment. The Complainant must be able to articulate linkages or a causal connection between the harm and the protected class. Witnesses and comparators must be identified if the Complainant was in a position to have access to such information. If the Complainant states that missing evidence exists, Complainants will be given 14 days to provide the evidence upon request of the investigator. Failure to provide the required information may result in a dismissal. Investigators will utilize Civil Rights Division's screening criteria to separate cases into “A”, “B”, or “C” categories: “A” CASES are those that more likely than not will result in substantial evidence cases. Full investigation will be conducted until the investigator is able to write a substantial evidence administrative determination or a dismissal memo. “B” CASES are those that need more information in order to determine whether it is an “A” or “C” case. The investigator may utilize the investigative tools including fact finding conferences, specific interrogatories, witness Respondent interviews as appropriate. C” CASES are those that are dismissed because the evidence gathered would not be sufficient to result in a substantial evidence finding. In most cases, Complainants will have been interviewed and a Respondent position statement will be in the case file. Some examples of cases that can be resolved under “C” category dismissal are: non-jurisdictional, charges unsupported by any direct or circumstantial evidence of discrimination and the Complainant was in a position to have access to such evidence, the Complainant is not credible. When a dismissal has been determined, the Complainant will be informed that he/she may pursue their case through the courts and will, if applicable, receive a state notice of Complainant's right to file a civil suit. The investigator who is responsible for deciding a dismissal must explain to the complainant why the action was taken. Dismissal cases require the investigator to write a brief memo to the case file which must be reviewed by a second investigator or a supervisor and which states the reason why the case has been dis...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Charge Assessment

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Formative Assessment The process used to assess progress towards attaining goals set forth in Educator plans, performance on standards, or both. This process may take place at any time(s) during the cycle of evaluation, but typically takes place at mid-cycle.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Lodgement of SWS wage assessment agreement C.6.1 All SWS wage assessment agreements under the conditions of this schedule, including the appropriate percentage of the relevant minimum wage to be paid to the employee, must be lodged by the employer with Fair Work Australia.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.