Community Engagement in the Reform Process Sample Clauses

Community Engagement in the Reform Process. The Parties agree that community input is essential throughout the reform process, and they will include mechanisms in the Consent Decree to receive that input and update the community about the implementation of the Consent Decree. These mechanisms may include written submissions directly to the Independent Monitor and the Parties, periodic public meetings attended by representatives of the Parties and the Independent Monitor, or other mechanisms suggested by the community. The Parties also agree that the input of BPD officers and their representatives is a critical factor to consider in ensuring that the Consent Decree provides officers with the practical guidance, tools, and support they need to effectively and efficiently carry out the Consent Decree’s requirements and enhance safety for both officers and the community they serve. Once a Consent Decree is reached, the Parties commit to engage with community stakeholders, including BPD officers, to ensure a broad understanding of the terms of the Consent Decree. The Consent Decree will not substitute or foreclose other initiatives by the community or the City to promote reform and oversight of, or partnerships with, BPD.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Community Engagement in the Reform Process

  • Community Engagement The HSP will engage the community of diverse persons and entities in the area where it provides health services when setting priorities for the delivery of health services and when developing plans for submission to the LHIN including but not limited to CAPS and integration proposals. As part of its community engagement activities, the HSPs will have in place and utilize effective mechanisms for engaging families, caregivers, clients, residents, patients and other individuals who use the services of the HSP, to help inform the HSP plans, including the HSP’s contribution to the establishment and implementation by the LHIN of geographic sub-regions in its local health system.

  • Community Engagement Integration Activities The SP will support the HSP to engage the community of diverse persons and entities in the area where it provides health services when setting priorities for the delivery of health services and when developing plans for submission to the LHIN including but not limited to CAPS and integration proposals.

  • Community Involvement The Grantee will facilitate and convene a Community Task Force as one means of developing collaboration among the Grantee, affected residents, and the broader community. The Grantee also will provide information to keep the Community Task Force fully apprised of the planning and implementation of revitalization efforts. The Community Task Force shall be comprised of affected public housing residents, local government officials, service providers, community groups, and others. The Community Task Force will provide advice, counsel and recommendations to the Grantee on all aspects of the HOPE VI development process, including shaping the goals and outcome of the Community and Supportive Services Plan. Community Task Force participants also will disseminate information throughout the community about the Grantee's revitalization efforts. The Grantee's responsibilities with regard to the Community Task Force include:

  • Modified Indemnity Where Agreement Involves Design Professional Services Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by California Civil Code section 2782.8, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California Civil Code section 2782.8.

  • Community Outreach Please describe all community outreach efforts undertaken since the last report.

  • Outpatient emergency and urgicenter services within the service area The emergency room copay applies to all outpatient emergency visits that do not result in hospital admission within twenty-four (24) hours. The urgicenter copay is the same as the primary care clinic office visit copay.

  • Community Mental Health Center Services Assertive Community Treatment Staffing Full Time Equivalents Community Mental Health Center June 2020 March 2020 Nurse Masters Level Clinician/or Equivalent Functional Support Worker Peer Specialist Total (Excluding Psychiatry) Psychiatrist/Nurse Practitioner Total (Excluding Psychiatry) Psychiatrist/Nurse Practitioner 01 Northern Human Services 1.81 1.80 9.75 0.00 13.36 1.20 16.37 1.20 02 West Central Behavioral Health 0.70 1.20 3.70 0.50 6.10 0.50 6.10 0.50 03 Lakes Region Mental Health Center 1.00 2.00 2.50 1.00 6.50 0.75 7.00 0.75 04 Riverbend Community Mental Health Center 0.50 2.00 8.00 0.00 10.50 0.50 10.50 0.50 05 Monadnock Family Services 2.00 2.25 3.50 1.10 8.85 0.65 8.85 0.65 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 1 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 8.00 0.25 6.50 0.25 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 2 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 8.00 0.25 7.50 0.25 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-CTT 1.00 11.00 5.25 1.00 18.25 0.91 18.25 0.91 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-MCST 1.00 8.00 7.25 1.00 17.25 0.91 16.25 0.91 08 Seacoast Mental Health Center 1.00 2.10 5.00 1.00 9.10 0.60 9.10 0.60 09 Community Partners 0.25 2.00 6.95 0.00 9.20 0.70 11.05 0.63 10 Center for Life Management 1.00 2.00 4.30 1.00 8.30 0.40 8.55 0.40 Total 12.26 36.35 66.20 8.60 123.41 7.62 127.02 7.55 2b. Community Mental Health Center Services: Assertive Community Treatment Staffing Competencies Community Mental Health Center Substance Use Disorder Treatment Housing Assistance Supported Employment June 2020 March 2020 June 2020 March 2020 June 2020 March 2020 01 Northern Human Services 3.55 2.55 8.75 10.75 1.00 1.50 02 West Central Behavioral Health 0.20 0.20 4.10 4.10 0.60 0.60 03 Lakes Region Mental Health Center 1.00 1.00 5.50 6.00 2.00 2.00 04 Riverbend Community Mental Health Center 1.50 1.50 9.50 9.50 0.50 0.50 05 Monadnock Family Services 1.40 1.40 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 1 4.25 4.25 6.25 6.25 1.00 1.00 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 2 5.25 5.25 7.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-CCT 10.91 10.91 13.75 13.75 2.00 2.00 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-MCST 5.91 5.91 12.75 11.75 2.00 2.00 08 Seacoast Mental Health Center 2.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 09 Community Partners 2.70 2.63 5.05 5.05 0.38 0.68 10 Center for Life Management 3.00 3.00 7.00 7.00 0.30 0.30 Total 41.67 40.60 86.65 88.15 12.78 14.58 Revisions to Prior Period: None. Data Source: Bureau of Mental Health CMHC ACT Staffing Census Based on CMHC self-report. Notes: Data compiled 07/16/2020; for 2b: the Staff Competency values reflect the sum of FTEs trained to provide each service type. These numbers are not a reflection of the services delivered, but rather the quantity of staff available to provide each service. If staff are trained to provide multiple service types, their entire FTE value is credited to each service type.

  • Data Management Contractor will not use State data, including production data, for testing or development purposes unless authorized in writing by the State Chief Information Security Officer or delegate. Contractor will implement and maintain procedures to physically and logically segregate State data, unless otherwise explicitly authorized by the State Chief Information Security Officer or delegate.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.