Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing Sample Clauses

Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing. AAUP and Administration representatives may act as observers or participants at suspension and dismissal hearings in front of the Grievance Panel. 9.3.6.1 At a full hearing before a Grievance Panel the charges shall be presented by a representative of the Administration, who may be an attorney. The Faculty Member may also have a representative, who may be an attorney. The hearing, however, is not considered a court of law, and formal rules of evidence do not apply. 9.3.6.2 The burden of proof that adequate cause exists rests with the University and will be satisfied in dismissal cases only by clear and convincing 9.3.6.3 The Grievance Panel shall consist of five (5) members of the Grievance Committee selected as described in Article 8. 5.1. In cases involving dismissal, all persons serving on the Grievance Panel must hold faculty titles. 9.3.6.4 Other than the parties or their representatives, there shall be a separation of witnesses so that only one witness at a time may be present in the hearing room. 9.3.6.5 The Administration and/or its representative and the Faculty Member and/or his/her representative may make opening statements. 9.3.6.6 The Administration shall proceed first. After each Administration witness testifies, the Faculty Member and/or his/her representative may question the witness. The Administration and the Faculty Member and/or their representatives may subsequently alternate with follow-up questions. 9.3.6.7 Upon completion of the Administration's presentation, the Faculty Member may proceed. After each Faculty Member's witness testifies, the Administration and/or its representative may question the witness. The Faculty Member and/or his/her representative and the Administration may subsequently alternate with follow-up questions. 9.3.6.8 Participants shall confine their presentations to facts relevant to the charges. The Panel chairperson is authorized to determine whether a particular fact is relevant to the charges. 9.3.6.9 The Administration and the Faculty Member may present only that rebuttal evidence which has direct bearing on previously submitted evidence. 9.3.6.10 The Administration and/or its representative and the Faculty Member and/or his/her representative may make closing statements. 9.3.6.11 The Grievance Panel may use its discretion in setting procedures for conduct of the hearing, such as reasonable limits on the time available to both the Faculty Member and the Administration for questioning witnesses, provided that...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing. 9.3.7.1 At a full evidentiary hearing before a Grievance Panel the charges shall be presented by a representative of the President, who may be an attorney. The Faculty Member may also have a representative, who may be an attorney. The hearing, however, is not considered a court of law, and formal rules of evidence do not apply. 9.3.7.2 The burden of proof that adequate cause exists rests with the University and will be satisfied only by clear and convincing evidence in the record considered as a whole. 9.3.7.3 The Grievance Panel shall consist of seven (7) members of the Grievance Committee selected as described in Article

Related to Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing

  • Conduct of Hearing The arbitrator shall hold the hearing in Tampa, Florida, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. The hearing shall commence within twenty-five (25) days of the arbitrator's acceptance of selection, or as soon thereafter as is practicable, and the arbitrator shall issue the decision within forty-five (45) days of the close of the hearing or the submission of briefs, whichever is later, unless additional time is agreed to by the parties. The decision shall be in writing and shall set forth findings of fact, reasoning, and conclusions on the issues submitted. Except as expressly specified in this procedure, the provisions of the Florida Arbitration Code, Chapter 682, Florida Statutes, shall not apply. Except as modified by the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the rules and procedures of the American Arbitration Association.

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD: i. In order to help registrars and registrants identify inaccurate data in the Whois database, Registry Operator will audit Whois data for accuracy on a statistically significant basis (this commitment will be considered satisfied by virtue of and for so long as ICANN conducts such audits). ii. Work with registrars and registrants to remediate inaccurate Whois data to help ensure a more accurate Whois database. Registry Operator reserves the right to cancel a domain name registration on the basis of inaccurate data, if necessary. iii. Establish and maintain a Domains Protected Marks List (DPML), a trademark protection service that allows rights holders to reserve registration of exact match trademark terms and terms that contain their trademarks across all gTLDs administered by Registry Operator under certain terms and conditions. iv. At no cost to trademark holders, establish and maintain a Claims Plus service, which is a notice protection mechanism that begins at the end of ICANN’s mandated Trademark Claims period. v. Bind registrants to terms of use that define and prohibit illegal or abusive activity. vi. Limit the use of proxy and privacy registration services in cases of malfeasance. vii. Consistent with the terms of this Registry Agreement, reserve the right to exclude from distribution any registrars with a history of non-­‐compliance with the terms of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. viii. Registry Operator will be properly resourced to perform these protections.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • Implementation of Corrective Action Plan After the Corrective Action Plan is finalized, the Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to implement the finalized Corrective Action Plan on the timeline set forth therein and provide periodic reports (as provided for therein) to the Sellers on the status of their implementation of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Dissemination of Policy All members of the contractor's staff who are authorized to hire, supervise, promote, and discharge employees, or who recommend such action, or who are substantially involved in such action, will be made fully cognizant of, and will implement, the contractor's EEO policy and contractual responsibilities to provide EEO in each grade and classification of employment. To ensure that the above agreement will be met, the following actions will be taken as a minimum: a. Periodic meetings of supervisory and personnel office employees will be conducted before the start of work and then not less often than once every six months, at which time the contractor's EEO policy and its implementation will be reviewed and explained. The meetings will be conducted by the EEO Officer. b. All new supervisory or personnel office employees will be given a thorough indoctrination by the EEO Officer, covering all major aspects of the contractor's EEO obligations within thirty days following their reporting for duty with the contractor. c. All personnel who are engaged in direct recruitment for the project will be instructed by the EEO Officer in the contractor's procedures for locating and hiring minorities and women. d. Notices and posters setting forth the contractor's EEO policy will be placed in areas readily accessible to employees, applicants for employment and potential employees. e. The contractor's EEO policy and the procedures to implement such policy will be brought to the attention of employees by means of meetings, employee handbooks, or other appropriate means.

  • Data Protection All personal data contained in the agreement shall be processed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the EU institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data. Such data shall be processed solely in connection with the implementation and follow-up of the agreement by the sending institution, the National Agency and the European Commission, without prejudice to the possibility of passing the data to the bodies responsible for inspection and audit in accordance with EU legislation (Court of Auditors or European Antifraud Office (XXXX)). The participant may, on written request, gain access to his personal data and correct any information that is inaccurate or incomplete. He/she should address any questions regarding the processing of his/her personal data to the sending institution and/or the National Agency. The participant may lodge a complaint against the processing of his personal data with the [national supervising body for data protection] with regard to the use of these data by the sending institution, the National Agency, or to the European Data Protection Supervisor with regard to the use of the data by the European Commission.

  • Conduct of Mediation In consultation with the mediator, the parties will determine a location, timetable and procedure for the mediation or, if the parties cannot agree on these matters within 7 Working Days of the appointment of the mediator these matters will be determined by the mediator.

  • Ethics No officer, agent or employee of the Board is or shall be employed by Provider or has or shall have a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in this Agreement or the compensation to be paid hereunder except as may be permitted in writing by the Board’s Code of Ethics, adopted May 25, 2011 (11-0525-PO2), as amended from time to time, which policy is hereby incorporated by reference into and made part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.

  • Virus Protection The Bank is not responsible for any electronic virus or viruses that you may encounter. We suggest that you routinely scan your PC using a virus protection product. An undetected virus may corrupt and destroy your programs, files, and your hardware.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!