Conclusions and remarks Sample Clauses

Conclusions and remarks. In this paper, we introduced a certificateless two- party authenticated key agreement protocol; The KGC publishes the system parameters and public keys in a public directory. The public directory (LDAP server) possesses a certificate to prove its identity to both communicating parties. The communications between the KGC and the LDAP server is offline. Both the two communicating parties are able to compute the same secret symmetric key without messages exchanges, except the first hello message, which is encrypted. This makes it impossible to carry out a man in the middle attack to obtain information about the encryption/decryption key. Moreover, the scheme is secure against known key attack, resilient against unknown key share and key-compromise impersonation, and secure against weak perfect forward secrecy. Compared to the CTAKA protocol presented by Yang et. al (Yang et al., 2011) and the MHM protocol (Mokhtarnameh et al., 2011), the proposed scheme in this paper is resistant to the key escrow problem through using the second secret value x'A. This comes in contrast to the scheme proposed by Yang et. al in(Yang et al., 2011) where the KGC can easily compute the full private key for user A by multiplying the public term YA by its master secret value s and also in contrast to the scheme proposed by Mokhtarnameh et al. (Mokhtarnameh et al., 2011), in which the KGC can easily compute the full private key for client A by multiplying the public term PA by its master secret value s. The proposed protocol is immune against any inside (type 2) or outside (type 1) attacks. Therefore, the CTAKA protocol introduced in this paper is fully secure, if we assume that the KGC is honest and each party within the network has the full capability to fully protect its secret values. On the other hand, The results explained in Table 1 show that all the pairing free protocols stated in the table have costs of at least five points multiplications, two hash function evaluations and two message exchanges, except Mohamed et al. [18] and the improved CTAKA protocol. The proposed protocol requires more point multiplications and hash function evaluations than the protocol of Mohamed et al. But it is much practical as it does not require the involvement of the KGC at each session initiation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conclusions and remarks. ‌ By taking multiple materials into consideration, the reconstructed images can reveal the weights of materials that compose the object, providing substantially more useful information for the clinicians. Furthermore, the objective function and the gradient are uncomplicated to implement and the modified Hessian is a sufficient and stable estimate to the true Hessian. In addition, the merits of using a nonlinear interior point method are easy to identify. It is a globally convergent method with superlinear rate of convergence. It is also a stable and robust algorithm that can handle large-scale problems. Furthermore, there is substantial flexibility in choosing the initial guess because it does not need to satisfy the constraints. Although this method has advantages such as faster convergence, robust compu- tation and flexibility, it still has a few limitations. For example, implementation of nonlinear interior point method is not straightforward for large-scale problems. It re- quires solving a normal subproblem as well as a tangential subproblem. Furthermore, we need to decide the size of trust region in each iteration. Meanwhile, this method involves many parameters that we need to choose manually. So far, we have only tested 2D images rather than 3D images. For 3D images, the evaluation of each part might be more complicated, which is likely to increase the expense for solving this problem. For further research, we might consider the gradient-based methods such as the scaled gradient descent method or splitting methods such as the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) [21]. Chapter 4‌ The development of new energy-windowed spectral computed tomography (CT) ma- chines have received a great deal of interest in recent years; see, e.g. [2, 57]. These detectors assume that x-rays emitted by the x-ray source are composed of a spectrum of different energies, and in each energy window, the detector can detect a specific range of energy. Moreover, it assumes that the detector can perform photon count- ing and the data collected by the detector are nonnegative integers. Compared with traditional CT machines, we can avoid introducing beam-hardening artifacts [45] and improve quality of reconstructed images. To reconstruct the material maps of an object, we need to solve a nonlinear equation of the form Y = exp .−AWCT Σ S + E, (4.1) where Y is a matrix that gathers the projected data of each energy window in the corresponding column and the exponentia...
Conclusions and remarks. ‌ With the energy-windowed spectral CT model, we set up a nonlinear least squares problem under bound constraints. To solve this optimization problem, we propose a new preconditioner and then implement it into a two-step method. The new pre- conditioner can transform the eigenvalues of the original Xxxxx-Xxxxxx system into more clustered ones, which will lead to faster convergence and higher accuracy. With the introduction of the two-step method, we can guarantee that the obtained step is at least better than the approximate Cauchy point. By solving the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx system in the second step, we expect further reduction from the solution. Therefore, the convergence rate should be better than linearity. Moreover, we further restrict the size of each step with the help of trust regions. In addition, we can remove parts of noise and speed up the convergence rate with the scaling parameter and the regularization terms. On the other hand, it still has several limitations. Because of the nonlinearity of the objective function, it is hard to decide if we should accept the new step or not under certain circumstances. Furthermore, with multiple materials, we cannot use regular methods to choose regularization parameters. In each iteration, we need to solve a NKP problem to obtain the preconditioner. Even if the computational cost is cheap, it might be better if we can find a preconditioner that is feasible for all steps. We might also think about how to implement the preconditioner into first order methods such as FISTA [3]. Chapter 5‌ In Chapter 4, we discussed the energy-windowed spectral CT model and presented a preconditioning framework and a nonlinear optimization approach to compute the solution. In this chapter, we still focus on the energy-windowed spectral CT model Y = exp .−AWCT Σ S + E, (5.1) where Y is a matrix that gathers the projected data of each energy window in the corresponding column and the exponential operator is applied element-wise (i.e., it is not a matrix function). A is a matrix that is related to the quantitative information of ray trace and C is a matrix that contains linear attenuation coefficients for par- ticular (known) materials at specified energies. S is the matrix that accumulates the spectrum energies for each energy window in the corresponding column. We assume that S is square and invertible. Moreover, E represents the noise term and we assume that Eil ∼ N (0, yil) for each component Eil in E and yil in Y . We assume that the...

Related to Conclusions and remarks

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • Exclusions and Reservations A. Nothing in this Article will be construed as authorizing the Airline to conduct any business on the Airline Premises or elsewhere at the Airport separate and apart from the conduct of its permitted uses as authorized in this Agreement. B. The Airline will not interfere or permit interference with the use, operation, or maintenance of Airport, including but not limited to, the effectiveness or accessibility of the drainage, sewerage, water, communications, fire protection, utility, electric, or other systems installed or located at the Airport. C. The rights and privileges granted to the Airline pursuant to this Article will be subject to the Authority Rules and Regulations, as they may be amended from time to time. D. The Airline will not do or permit to be done anything, either by act or failure to act, that will cause the cancellation or violation of the provisions, or any part thereof, of any policy of insurance of the Authority, or that will cause a hazardous condition so as to increase the risks normally attendant upon operations permitted by this Agreement. If such act or failure to act on the part of the Airline will cause cancellation of any such policy, the Airline will immediately, upon notification by the Authority, take whatever steps or actions deemed necessary to cause reinstatement of said insurance. Furthermore, if the Airline does or permits to be done any act not expressly permitted under this Agreement, or fails to do any act required under this Agreement, regardless of whether such act constitutes a breach of this Agreement, that causes an increase in the Authority’s insurance premiums, the Airline will immediately remedy such actions and pay the increase in premiums, upon notice from the Authority to do so; but in any event, the Airline will hold the Authority harmless for any expenses and damage resulting from any action as set forth in this paragraph. E. Except as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement will be construed as establishing exclusive rights, operational or otherwise, to the Airline. F. Any and all rights and privileges not specifically granted to the Airline for its use of and operations at the Airport pursuant to this Agreement are hereby reserved for and to Authority. G. Other than those areas used for the purpose of egress and ingress, all operations will be conducted on the Airline Premises.

  • Notices; Standards for Decisions and Determinations The Administrative Agent will promptly notify the Borrower and the Lenders of (A) the implementation of any Benchmark Replacement and (B) the effectiveness of any Conforming Changes. For the avoidance of doubt, any notice required to be delivered by the Administrative Agent as set forth in this Section 12.01(c) may be provided, at the option of the Administrative Agent (in its sole discretion), in one or more notices and may be delivered together with, or as part of any amendment which implements any Benchmark Replacement or Conforming Changes. Any determination, decision or election that may be made by the Administrative Agent or, if applicable, any Lender (or group of Lenders) pursuant to this Section 12.01(c), including any determination with respect to a tenor, rate or adjustment or of the occurrence or non-occurrence of an event, circumstance or date and any decision to take or refrain from taking any action, will be conclusive and binding absent manifest error and may be made in its or their sole discretion and without consent from any other party hereto, except, in each case, as expressly required pursuant to this Section 12.01(c).

  • Extensions and Waivers At any time prior to the Closing, the parties hereto entitled to the benefits of a term or provision may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the parties hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any document, certificate or writing delivered pursuant hereto, or (c) waive compliance with any obligation, covenant, agreement or condition contained herein. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument or instruments in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of any such extension or waiver is sought. No failure or delay on the part of any party hereto in the exercise of any right hereunder shall impair such right or be construed to be a waiver of, or acquiescence in, any breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement.

  • Certain Calculations and Tests (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, but subject to Sections 1.10(b) and (c) and Section 1.11, all financial ratios and tests (including the Total Leverage Ratio, the First Lien Leverage Ratio, the Secured Leverage Ratio, the Interest Coverage Ratio and the amount of Consolidated Total Assets and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA) contained in this Agreement that are calculated with respect to any Test Period during which any Subject Transaction occurs shall be calculated with respect to such Test Period and each such Subject Transaction on a Pro Forma Basis. Further, if since the beginning of any such Test Period and on or prior to the date of any required calculation of any financial ratio or test (i) any Subject Transaction has occurred or (ii) any Person that subsequently became a Restricted Subsidiary or was merged, amalgamated or consolidated with or into the Borrower or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or any joint venture since the beginning of such Test Period has consummated any Subject Transaction, then, in each case, any applicable financial ratio or test shall be calculated on a Pro Forma Basis for such Test Period as if such Subject Transaction had occurred at the beginning of the applicable Test Period (it being understood, for the avoidance of doubt, that solely for purposes of (x) calculating compliance with Section 6.12(a) and (y) calculating the First Lien Leverage Ratio for purposes of the definitions of “Applicable Rate” and “Commitment Fee Rate”, in each case, no Subject Transaction occurring after the end of the relevant Test Period shall be taken into account). (b) For purposes of determining the permissibility of any action, change, transaction or event that requires a calculation of any financial ratio or test (including, without limitation, Section 6.12(a), any First Lien Leverage Ratio test, any Secured Leverage Ratio test, any Total Leverage Ratio test and/or any Interest Coverage Ratio test, the amount of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and/or Consolidated Total Assets), such financial ratio or test shall be calculated at the time such action is taken (subject to Section 1.11), such change is made, such transaction is consummated or such event occurs, as the case may be, and no Default or Event of Default shall be deemed to have occurred solely as a result of a change in such financial ratio or test occurring after the time such action is taken, such change is made, such transaction is consummated or such event occurs, as the case may be. (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, with respect to any amounts incurred or transactions entered into (or consummated) in reliance on a provision of this Agreement (including any covenant or the definition of “Incremental Cap”) that does not require compliance with a financial ratio or test (including, without limitation, Section 6.12(a), any First Lien Leverage Ratio test, any Secured Leverage Ratio test, any Total Leverage Ratio test and/or any Interest Coverage Ratio test) (any such amounts, the “Fixed Amounts”) substantially concurrently with any amounts incurred or transactions entered into (or consummated) in reliance on a provision of this Agreement (including any covenant or the definition of “Incremental Cap”) that requires compliance with a financial ratio or test (including, without limitation, Section 6.12(a), any First Lien Leverage Ratio test, any Secured Leverage Ratio test, any Total Leverage Ratio test and/or any Interest Coverage Ratio test) (any such amounts, the “Incurrence-Based Amounts”), it is understood and agreed that the Fixed Amounts shall be disregarded in the calculation of the financial ratio or test applicable to the Incurrence-Based Amounts.

  • Access to Records; Discussions With Officers and Accountants On an annual basis, or upon the occurrence of a Material Adverse Change, the Sub-Servicer shall, upon the reasonable request of the Insurer, permit the Insurer or its authorized agents: (i) to inspect the books and records of the Sub-Servicer as they may relate to the Obligations, the obligations of the Sub-Servicer under the Transaction Documents, and the Transaction; (ii) to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of the Sub-Servicer with the chief operating officer and the chief financial officer of the Sub-Servicer; and (iii) with the Sub-Servicer's consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, to discuss the affairs, finances and accounts of the Sub-Servicer with the Sub-Servicer's independent accountants, provided that an officer of the Sub-Servicer shall have the right to be present during such discussions. Such inspections and discussions shall be conducted upon reasonable notice and during normal business hours and shall not unreasonably disrupt the business of the Sub-Servicer. The books and records of the Sub-Servicer shall be maintained at the address of the Sub-Servicer designated herein for receipt of notices, unless the Sub-Servicer shall otherwise advise the parties hereto in writing. The Insurer agrees that it and its shareholders, directors, agents, accountants and attorneys shall keep confidential any matter of which it becomes aware through such inspections or discussions (unless readily available from public sources), except as may be otherwise required by regulation, law or court order or requested by appropriate governmental authorities or as necessary to preserve its rights or security under or to enforce the Transaction Documents, provided that the foregoing shall not limit the right of the Insurer to make such information available to its regulators, securities rating agencies, reinsurers, credit and liquidity providers, counsel and accountants.

  • GENERAL PROVISIONS AND RECITALS 12 1. The parties agree that the terms used, but not otherwise defined below in Paragraph B, shall 13 have the same meaning given to such terms under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 14 of 1996, Public Law 104-191 (“HIPAA”), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical 15 Health Act, Public Law 111-005 (“the HITECH Act”), and their implementing regulations at 45 CFR Parts 16 160 and 164 (“the HIPAA regulations”) as they may exist now or be hereafter amended. 17 2. The parties agree that a business associate relationship under HIPAA, the HITECH Act, and 18 the HIPAA regulations between CONTRACTOR and COUNTY arises to the extent that CONTRACTOR 19 performs, or delegates to subcontractors to perform, functionsor activities on behalf of COUNTY pursuant 20 to, and as set forth in, the Contract that are described in the definition of “Business Associate” in 45 CFR 21 § 160.103. 22 3. COUNTY wishes to disclose to CONTRACTOR certain information pursuant to the terms of 23 the Contract, some of which may constitute Protected Health Information (“PHI”), as defined below in 24 Subparagraph B.10, to be used or disclosed in the course of providing services and activities pursuant to, 25 and as set forth, in the Contract. 26 4. The parties intend to protect the privacy and provide for the security of PHI that may be 27 created, received, maintained, transmitted, used, or disclosed pursuant to the Contract in compliance with 28 the applicable standards, implementation specifications, and requirements of HIPAA, the HITECH Act, 29 and the HIPAA regulations as they may exist now or be hereafter amended. 30 5. The parties understand and acknowledge that HIPAA, the HITECH Act, and the HIPAA 31 regulations do not pre-empt any state statutes, rules, or regulations that are not otherwise pre-empted by 32 other Federal law(s) and impose more stringent requirements with respect to privacy of PHI. 33 6. The parties understand that the HIPAA Privacy and Security rules, as defined below in 34 Subparagraphs B.9. and B.14., apply to CONTRACTOR in the same manner as they apply to a covered 35 entity (COUNTY). XXXXXXXXXX agrees therefore to be in compliance at all times with the terms of 36 this Business Associate Contract, as it exists now or be hereafter updated with notice to CONTRACTOR, 37 and the applicable standards, implementation specifications, and requirements of the Privacy and the 1 Security rules, as they may exist now or be hereafter amended, with respect to PHI and electronic PHI 2 created, received, maintained, transmitted, used, or disclosed pursuant to the Contract.

  • Certifications and Audits Company shall promptly complete and return to BNYM any certifications which BNYM in its sole discretion may from time to time send to Company, certifying that Company is using the Licensed System in strict compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. BNYM may, at its expense and after giving reasonable advance written notice to Company, enter Company locations during normal business hours and audit Company’s utilization of the Licensed System, the number of copies of the Documentation in Company’s possession, and the scope of use and information pertaining to Company’s compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. The foregoing right may be exercised directly by BNYM or by delegation to an independent auditor acting on its behalf. If BNYM discovers that there is any unauthorized scope of use or that Company is not in compliance with the aforementioned provisions, Company shall reimburse BNYM for the full costs incurred in conducting the audit.

  • Statements and Information Available On-Line (a) Bank will send, or make available on-line, to Customer, at times mutually agreed, a statement of account in Bank's standard format for each Account maintained by Customer with Bank, identifying the Financial Assets and cash held in each Account. Bank also will provide to Customer, upon request, the capability to reformat the information contained in each statement of account. In addition, Bank will send, or make available on-line, to Customer an advice or notification of any transfers of cash or Financial Assets with respect to each Account. Bank will not be liable with respect to any matter set forth in those portions of any such statement of account or advice (or reasonably implied therefrom) to which Customer has not given Bank a written exception or objection within ninety days of receipt of such statement, provided such matter is not the result of Bank's willful misconduct or bad faith. (b) Prices and other information obtained from third parties which may be contained in any statement sent to Customer have been obtained from sources Bank believes to be reliable. Bank does not, however, make any representation as to the accuracy of such information or that the prices specified necessarily reflect the proceeds that would be received on a disposal of the relevant Financial Assets. (c) Customer understands that records and reports, other than statements of account, that are available to it on-line on a real-time basis may not be accurate due to mis-postings, delays in updating Account records, and other causes. Bank will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of the inaccuracy of any such records or reports that are accessed on-line on a real-time basis.

  • Exceptions to Informal Negotiations and Arbitration The Parties agree that the following Disputes are not subject to the above provisions concerning informal negotiations and binding arbitration: (a) any Disputes seeking to enforce or protect, or concerning the validity of, any of the intellectual property rights of a Party; (b) any Dispute related to, or arising from, allegations of theft, piracy, invasion of privacy, or unauthorized use; and (c) any claim for injunctive relief. If this provision is found to be illegal or unenforceable, then neither Party will elect to arbitrate any Dispute falling within that portion of this provision found to be illegal or unenforceable and such Dispute shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction within the courts listed for jurisdiction above, and the Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of that court. There may be information on the Site that contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or omissions, including descriptions, pricing, availability, and various other information. We reserve the right to correct any errors, inaccuracies, or omissions and to change or update the information on the Site at any time, without prior notice.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!