Table 1 Sample Clauses

Table 1. Parties Start date The Effective Date of the Agreement The Parties Exporter (who sends the Restricted Transfer) Importer (who receives the Restricted Transfer) Parties’ details Customer Full legal name: Webflow, Inc. Main address (if a company registered address): 000 00xx Xx. Xx 0, Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, 00000, XXX Key Contact Attn: Customer Contact details including email: email address provided by Customer Attn: Privacy Counsel Contact details including email: xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Table 1. Author Manuscript Distribution of Treatment Suggestions for Melanoma In Situ and Invasive Melanoma Case Diagnoses by Pathologist Characteristics Melanoma in situ treatment suggestion IM treatment suggestiona excision excision Excision excision Excision < 0.5cm 0.5-<1cmb ≥ 1cm < 1cm b ≥ 1cm No 2833 80 (13%) 449 (72%) 96 (15%) 339 (15%) 1869 (85%) Yes 1229 31 (11 %) 216 (75%) 41 (14%) 99 (11 %) 842 (89%) No 2308 89 (17%) 330 (62%) 114 (21%) 328 (18%) 1447 (82%) Yes 1754 22 (6%) 335 (88%) 23 (6%) 110 (8%) 1264 (92%) < 10 years 1583 19 (6%) 273 (80%) 50 (15%) 56 (5%) 1185 (95%) 10 years + 2479 92 (16%) 392 (69%) 87 (15%) 382 (20%) 1526 (80%) < 10 percent 1581 62 (17%) 219 (61%) 76 (21 %) 250 (20%) 974 (80%) ≥ 10 percent 2481 49 (9%) 446 (80%) 61 (11 %) 188 (10%) 1737 (90%) Author Manuscript
Table 1. Full‐Time Regular Employees Basic Annual Salary Schedule Effective September 20, 2018 Step 3 4 5 JJ 31,243 32,588 II 32,336 33,671 HH 33,429 34,754 GG 34,522 35,837 Pay Grade 6 7 8 9 10 11 FF 35,615 36,920 39,218 41,497 43,780 44,525 EE 36,708 38,003 40,238 42,459 44,690 45,463 DD 37,801 39,086 41,258 43,421 45,600 46,401 CC 38,894 40,169 42,278 44,383 46,510 47,339 BB 39,987 41,252 43,298 45,345 47,420 48,277 AA 41,080 42,335 44,318 46,307 48,330 49,215 A 42,173 43,418 45,338 47,269 49,240 50,153 B 43,266 44,501 46,358 48,231 50,150 51,091 C 44,359 45,584 47,378 49,193 51,060 52,029 D 45,452 46,667 48,398 50,155 51,970 52,967 57,023 60,484 61,785 E 46,545 47,750 49,418 51,117 52,880 53,905 57,725 61,318 62,668 F 47,638 48,833 50,438 52,079 53,790 54,843 58,427 62,152 63,551 G 48,731 49,916 51,458 53,041 54,700 55,781 59,129 62,986 64,434 H 49,824 50,999 52,478 54,003 55,610 56,719 59,831 63,820 65,317 I 50,917 52,082 53,498 54,965 56,520 57,657 60,533 64,654 66,200 J 52,010 53,165 54,518 55,927 57,430 58,595 61,235 65,488 67,083 K 53,103 54,248 55,538 56,889 58,340 59,533 61,937 66,322 67,966 L 54,196 55,331 56,558 57,851 59,250 60,471 62,639 67,156 68,849 M 55,289 56,414 57,578 58,813 60,160 61,409 63,341 67,990 69,732 N 56,382 57,497 58,598 59,775 61,070 62,347 64,043 68,824 70,615 O 57,610 58,580 59,618 60,737 61,980 63,285 64,745 69,658 71,498 P 65,447 70,492 72,381
Table 1. Sample of identified job patterns. Job Pattern 3-test vector Type of job aaaaa a+ Z = ({aa}, {aa}, {aaa}, {aa}) Homogeneous
Table 1. The criteria for classification are the potential for the practice to adversely affect significant cultural resources. A conservation or management system involving more than one type of practice covering the same geographic area is a “Review” practice if any practice within that area is classified as a “Review.” Mississippi conservation practices are identified in the NRCS Mississippi Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxx/technical/efotg/index.html . Classifications are based on General Manual 420 part 401.40 through 420 part 401.42 and the practice descriptions found in Section IV National Practice Standards and Mississippi Practice Specifications of the FOTG. Some practices are listed in Table 1 twice (highlighted in gray) because they may be carried out using different methods. For example, Forest Site Preparation (490) may be accomplished through the use of chemicals, burning, or light mechanical (Exempt) or heavy mechanical (Review) methods. Follow the procedures for the methods appropriate to the planned practice. Exempt (E): Conservation practices that have no potential or only minor potential to cause adverse effects to cultural resources are considered “Exempt.” These practices are generally management related, do not have any or only minimal physical effects, are usually planned in areas of previous disturbance, and/or do not alter cultural resources. “Exempt” practices may, however, alter land use or ground cover conditions at cultural resources locations. Some of these practices may actually provide beneficial effects such as improving soil cover stability. A background review of the archaeological site files data and NRHP listings should be conducted for all “Exempt” practices. For practices that are classified as “Exempt,” a statement should be included on the CPA-52 form in the Comments field, or the Conservation Assistance Notes (CPA-6) to document that cultural resources were considered and the practice determined to be “Exempt” from further review.
Table 1 reflects the cover currently provided under the 2021-22 insurance programme noting that 2022-23 will be the last year of a three year ‘long term agreement’ with insurers (although there is an option to extend the contract for a further two years). Table 1. Cover provided Insurer What’s covered Notes and observations
Table 1. PHP Liquidated Damages is revised and restated in its entirety as follows:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Table 1 a. Table 1C to Purchase Agreement No. PA-03659, 787-10 Block A Aircraft Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments Rolls Royce Engines is deleted in its entirety and replaced by a revised Table 1C to Purchase Agreement No. PA-03659, 787-10 Block A Aircraft Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments Rolls Royce Engines provided as Enclosure 2 to this Supplemental Agreement No. 16 to [*].
Table 1. An example of matrix of received messages at the end of Round 3. Table 2 shows the matrices at N1 and N2, as examples, at the end of Round 3. The grayed rows indicate the effects of link faults at the two nodes in Round 3.
Table 1. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Interobserver agreement for headache descriptors and temporal characteristics (n=191) Frontal 184 7 123/184 (66.8) 78.8 (72,2, 84.5) 0.54 (0.42, 0.67) Temporal or parietal 184 7 65/184 (35.3) 79.3 (72.8, 85) 0.57 (0.45, 0.69) Occipital 184 7 38/184 (20.7) 92.4 (87.6, 95.8) 0.77 (0.65, 0.88) Top of head 184 7 24/184 (13.0) 92.4 (87.6, 95.8) 0.63 (0.45, 0.80) Laterality/distribution of headache Unilateral/focal 175 16 68/175 (38.9) 80.0 (73.3, 85.7) 0.58 (0.45, 0.70) Bilateral 175 16 81/175 (46.3) 74.9 (67.8, 81.1) 0.49 (0.36, 0.62) Band around head 175 16 6/175 (3.4) 95.4 (91.2, 98) 0.18 (−0.17, 0.51) Diffuse/whole head/“all over” 175 16 20/175 (11.4) 90.3 (84.9, 94.2) 0.58 (0.41, 0.76) Quality of headache2 Pulsating/pounding/ throbbing 190 0 94/190 (74.2) 74.2 (67.4, 80.3) 0.48 (0.36, 0.61) Pressing/squeezing/ tightening 190 0 47/190 (24.7) 74.2 (67.4, 80.3) 0.29 (0.14, 0.45) Sharp/stabbing 190 0 37/190 (19.5) 78.9 (72.5, 84.5) 0.30 (0.13, 0.47) Other 190 0 7/190 (3.7) 96.3 (92.6, 98.5) 0.44 (0.10, 0.79) Patient cannot describe 190 0 22/190 (11.6) 88.9 (83.6, 93) 0.53 (0.35, 0.70) Headache reached maximal intensity in… … < 1 minute but > 1 second 141 41 27/141 (19.1) 76.6 (68.7, 83.3) 0.23 (0.04, 0.43) … < 1 second 141 41 10/141 (7.1) 90.8 (84.8, 95) 0.19 (−0.09, 0.46) Pain intensity at ED presentation None (or pain score=0) 176 10 25/176 (14.2) 89.4 (83.7, 93.4) 0.58 (0.41, 0.75) Mild (or pain score=1–3) 176 10 27/176 (15.3) 85.0 (79.1, 90.1) 0.42 (0.24, 0.60) Moderate (or pain score=4– 6) 176 10 56/176 (31.8) 83.3 (77.2, 88.7) 0.62 (0.49, 0.74) Severe (or pain score=7–10) 176 10 68/176 (38.6) 85.6 (79.7, 90.6) 0.69 (0.58, 0.80) Worst headache of patient’s3 life 122 15 43/122 (35.2) 80.0 (72.2, 87) 0.56 (0.41, 0.71) Duration of headache 1 day or less 172 14 51/172 (29.7) 85.4 (79.3, 90.4) 0.68 (0.56, 0.80) 2 to 3 days 172 14 39/172 (22.7) 90.1 (84.6, 94.1) 0.70 (0.57, 0.83) 4 to 7 days 172 14 20/172 (11.6) 90.7 (85.3, 94.6) 0.60 (0.42, 0.78) Author Manuscript Tsze et al. Page 12 >7 days 172 14 62/172 (36.0) 86.6 (80.6, 91.3) 0.71 (0.59, 0.82) Headache Temporal Characteristics4 First headache of patient’s life 186 1 37/186 (19.9) 87.1 (81.4, 91.6) 0.60 (0.46, 0.75) Increasing headache…3 -frequency 124 12 47/124 (38.8) 79.0 (70.8, 85.8) 0.58 (0.43, 0.72) -duration 119 18 46/119 (38.7) 74.8 (66, 82.3) 0.48 (0.31, 0.64) -severity 120 16 54/120 (45.0) 68.3 (59.2, 76.5) 0.36 (0.20, 0.53) Ch...
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!