Concurrent language Sample Clauses

Concurrent language. ‌ For any language Λ, we define the corresponding thread-pool semantics.  T ∈ ThreadPool , Exprn T ; σ → T '; σ' e1, σ1 → e2, σ2, ef ef =/ ⊥ T ++ [e1] ++ T '; σ1 → T ++ [e2] ++ T ' ++ [ef]; σ2 e1, σ1 → e2, σ2 T ++ [e1] ++ T '; σ1 → T ++ [e2] ++ T '; σ2 5 Logic‌ To instantiate Iris, you need to define the following parameters: • A language Λ, and • COF𝖲 → CMRA a locally contractive bifunctor Σ : defining the ghost state, such that for all COFEs A, the CMRA Σ(A) has a unit. (By Lemma 1, this means that the core of Σ(A) is a total function.) As usual for higher-order logics, you can furthermore pick a signature S = (𝓨 , F, A) to add more types, symbols and axioms to the language. You have to make sure that 𝓨 includes the base types: 𝓨 ⊇ {Val, Expr, State, M, InvName, InvMask, Prop} Elements of 𝓨 are ranged over by T . Each function symbol in F has an associated arity comprising a natural number n and an ordered list of n + 1 types τ (the grammar of τ is defined below, and depends only on 𝓨 ). We write F : τ1, . . . , τn → τn+1 ∈ F to express that F is a function symbol with the indicated arity. 𝓨 F A A A Furthermore, is a set of axioms, that is, terms t of type Prop. Again, the grammar of terms and their typing rules are defined below, and depends only on and , not on . Elements of are ranged over by A. 5.1 Grammar‌ S Syntax. Iris syntax is built up from a signature and a countably infinite set Var of variables (ranged over by metavariables x, y, z): τ ::= T | 1 | τ × τ | τ → τ t, P, ϕ ::= x | F (t1, . . . , tn) | () | (t, t) | πi t | λx : τ. t | t(t) | ε | |t| | t · t | False | True | t =τ t | P ⇒ P | P ∧ P | P ∨ P | P ∗ P | P —∗ P | µx : τ. t | ∃x : τ. P | ∀x : τ. P | | | V(t) | Phy(t) | P | .P | t|$t P | wp t {x. t} Recursive predicates must be guarded: in µx. t, the variable x can only appear under the later . modality. | $P . Note that and . bind more tightly than ∗, —∗ , ∧, ∨, and ⇒. We will write |$ P for t|$t P . If we omit the mask, then it is 𝖳 for weakest precondition wp e {x. P } and ∅ for primitive view shifts Some propositions are timeless, which intuitively means that step-indexing does not affect them. This is a meta-level assertion about propositions, defined as follows: Γ ▶ timeless(P ) , Γ | .P ▶ P ∨ .False metavariable type metavariable type 𝖲 InvMask ϕ, ψ, ζ τ → Prop (when τ is clear from context) 5.2 Types‌ ▶ Iris terms are simply-typed. The judgment Γ t : τ expresses that, in variable context Γ, the term t has type τ . A varia...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Concurrent language

  • Contract Language The following language shall be included in contracts for City projects between the Consultant and any Subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers: Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, gender expression, gender identity, religion, national origin, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, or disability in the solicitation, selection, hiring, or treatment of subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers. Consultant shall provide equal opportunity for Subcontractors to participate in opportunities. Consultant understands and agrees that violation of this clause shall be considered a material breach of the contract and may result in contract termination, debarment, or other sanctions.

  • Suggested Language The regulation at 29 C.F.R. § 5.5(b) provides contract clause language concerning compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. FEMA suggests including the following contract clause:

  • Mandate Letter language The Funder will receive a Mandate Letter from the Ministry annually. Each Mandate Letter articulates areas of focus for the Funder, and the Ministry’s expectation that the Funder and health service providers it funds will collaborate to advance these areas of focus. To assist the HSP in its collaborative efforts with the Funder, the Funder will share each relevant Mandate Letter with the HSP. The Funder may also add local obligations to Schedule D as appropriate to further advance any priorities set put in a Mandate Letter.

  • French Language Spanish Language

  • Controlling Language This Agreement is in English only, which language shall be controlling in all respects. All documents exchanged under this Agreement shall be in English.

  • Sample Language The following provides a sample contract clause: Compliance with the Xxxxxxxx “Anti-Kickback” Act.

  • Governing Language This Agreement has been negotiated and executed by the parties in English. In the event any translation of this Agreement is prepared for convenience or any other purpose, the provisions of the English version shall prevail.

  • Official Language 1. All proceedings pursuant to this Agreement shall be conducted in the English language. 2. Any document submitted for use in any proceedings pursuant to this Agreement shall be in the English language. If any original document is not in the English language, a Party submitting it for use in the proceedings pursuant to this Agreement shall provide an English translation of that document.

  • Official Languages (a) Appointments and transfers shall be subject to the Corporate Official Languages Policy, as it may be amended from time to time. (b) The parties agree to study the feasibility of developing a program to facilitate the exchange of employees who wish to improve their proficiency in the other official language.

  • Construction of Language Whenever appropriate in the Agreement, words used in the singular may be read in the plural, words used in the plural may be read in the singular, and words importing the masculine gender may be read as referring equally to the feminine or the neuter. Any reference to a section shall be a reference to a section of this Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Capitalized terms not specifically defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them under the Plan.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!