Conducting Evaluations Sample Clauses

Conducting Evaluations. 13.1.1 The University retains the right to evaluate adjunct professors, including use of student and/or administrative evaluations.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conducting Evaluations. Evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with established District protocols.
Conducting Evaluations. The performance of a Unit B Member shall be observed openly and with the full knowledge of the Unit B Member. No adverse comments shall be made to a Unit B Member in the presence of pupils, parents or other non-Unit B Members. Any issues, concerns, or opportunities for improvement shall be brought to the attention [verbally] of the Unit B Member within a reasonable time. APPENDIX “B” UNIT B TIMELINE Unit B Members will be evaluated every year. All Unit B administrators will have four goals as part of their evaluation. The Management/Operations standard (2) may be substituted with the teaching All Students Standard (2) according to the State Evaluation Rubric. If needed, can be discussed at goals meetings. • By September 30 – Unit B Members will be informed about the Evaluation Procedure. • By October 31 – Goals meeting based on Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) and School and District Improvement Plans will occur. • By February 15– Mid-year goals’ meetings will be held. • By the June 15– Year end goals’ meetings will be held. • By the June 30 – Final evaluation narratives will be completed by evaluators. Important Terms Final Evaluation – A narrative, written by the evaluator, discussing the Unit B Members annual performance in light of specific goals. Goals’ Meetings – Meetings held at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year for the purpose of Unit B Members and evaluators determining, discussing, and monitoring annual goals Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) – A plan developed by Unit B Members, monitored by administrators, and required by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for professional development planning, certification, and licensure. Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Realistic, Timely (XXXXX) Goals – Characteristics of the annual goals developed by teachers. Teachers with Non-professional Status – Teachers who have worked in the Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Regional School District for a period of time less than three complete school years with each school year of employment beginning on the first day of school for teachers and ending on the last day of school. APPENDIX “C” UNIT A SALARY SCHEDULES
Conducting Evaluations. 1. Non-Probationary ESP’s shall be given a minimum of one written evaluation to be conducted biannually.
Conducting Evaluations. Project Manager per day/per hour Senior Evaluator/Team leader per day Evaluation Specialist per day Subject matter expert (Education, Health, etc) per day Data collectors/field workers per day Type of service Method of pricing Price in USD Translators per page Quality assurace support per hour Editorial support per page/per hour Graphic designer (if applicable) per day
Conducting Evaluations. The performance of a Unit B Member shall be observed openly and with the full knowledge of the Unit B Member. No adverse comments shall be made to a Unit B Member in the presence of pupils, parents or other non-Unit B Members. Any issues, concerns, or opportunities for improvement shall be brought to the attention [verbally] of the Unit B Member within a reasonable time. APPENDIX “B” UNIT B TIMELINE Unit B Members will be evaluated every year. All Unit B administrators will have four goals as part of their evaluation. The Management/Operations standard (2) may be substituted with the teaching All Students Standard

Related to Conducting Evaluations

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.