CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS Sample Clauses

CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS. A. Consistency With PG&E’s Adopted RPS Procurement Plan PG&E’s 2009 Renewable Procurement Plan (“2009 Plan”) was conditionally approved in D.00-00-000 on June 4, 2009. As required by statute, the 2009 Plan included an assessment of supply and demand to determine the optimal mix of renewable generation resources, consideration of compliance flexibility mechanisms established by the Commission, and a bid solicitation setting forth the need for renewable generation of various operational characteristics.8 The PPA is also consistent with PG&E’s 2009 Plan because it adhered to PG&E’s Solicitation Protocol, which is the primary component of the 2009 Plan. The goal of PG&E’s 2009 Plan is to procure approximately one to two percent of its retail sales volume, or between 800 GWh and 1,600 GWh, per year. With expected RPS- eligible energy deliveries, on average, of approximately 303 GWh per year, the PPA meets the criteria for the renewables procurement contained in the 2009 Plan. Projects capable of providing actual deliveries in the near-term are especially valuable to PG&E to improve the likelihood of RPS compliance during the first compliance period (2011- 2013). Additionally, the PPA will contribute to PG&E’s longer-term RPS goals. The Project also meets the criteria for the renewables procurement contained in PG&E’s 2011 RPS Plan. The 2011 RPS Plan was conditionally approved in D.00-00-000 on April 14, 2011. PG&E submitted a final version of the 2011 RPS Plan on May 4, 2011. The goal of PG&E’s 2011 RPS Plan is to procure approximately one to two percent of PG&E’s annual retail sales volume, or 800 to 1,600 GWh per year. With expected RPS- eligible energy deliveries of 303 GWh per year for a term of 25 years commencing in 2012, the output from the Project will contribute a significant quantity of renewables procurement towards PG&E’s RPS goals consistent with PG&E’s 2011 RPS Plan.
Sample 1See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS. A. Consistency With PG&E’s Adopted RPS Procurement Plan PG&E’s 2011 Renewable Procurement Plan (“2011 Plan”) was conditionally approved in D.00-00-000 on April 14, 2011. As required by statute, the 2011 Plan includes an assessment of supply and demand to determine the optimal mix of renewable generation resources, consideration of compliance flexibility mechanisms established by the Commission, and a bid solicitation setting forth the need for renewable generation of various operational characteristics.3 The goal of PG&E’s 2011 Plan is to procure at least one to two percent of its retail sales volume, or between 800 GWh and 1,600 GWh per year. PG&E included the use of TRECs in its 2011 Plan and part of the procurement goal can be satisfied with TRECs instead of bundled power deliveries. Projects capable of providing actual deliveries or TRECs in the near-term are especially valuable to PG&E. Additionally, the PSA will contribute to PG&E’s longer-term RPS goals. The PSA’s contribution to PG&E’s RPS goals is discussed further in Confidential Appendix G.
Sample 1
CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS. A. Consistency With PG&E’s Adopted RPS Procurement Plan
Sample 1
CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS. A. RPS Procurement Plan
Sample 1
CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS 
Sample 1

Related to CONSISTENCY WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS

  • Review by the Bank of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Bank’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Bank.

  • Written Decisions Decisions rendered at Level One which are unsatisfactory to the aggrieved person and all decisions rendered at Levels Two and Three of the grievance procedure shall be in writing setting forth the decision and the reasons therefore, and shall be transmitted promptly to all parties in interest and to the Association.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Additional Wet Weather Procedure 14.15.1 Remaining On Site Where, because of wet weather, the employees are prevented from working:

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when:

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.