Procurement Review Group Participation. The Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) for PG&E includes the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, Union of Concerned Scientists (“UCS”), The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”), the California Utility Employees (“CUE”), and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer.6 The Amended and Restated PPA was discussed at meetings on August 14, 2009; December 15, 2009; February 12, 2010; and April 9, 2010.
Procurement Review Group Participation. PG&E discussed the Project with its Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) on June 14, 2011. PG&E addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A.
Procurement Review Group Participation. PG&E discussed the Project with its Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) on October 8, 2010, for the first time as a bilateral transaction. The transaction was subsequently presented to the PRG on December 10, 2010, March 8, 2011, May 17, 2011 and July 15, 2011. PG&E addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A.
Procurement Review Group Participation. PG&E informed its Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) of the Project on December 15, 2009, and February 12, 2010. PG&E further addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A. The PRG for PG&E includes representatives of the California Department of Water Resources, the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, Union of Concerned Scientists, The Utility Reform Network, the California Utility Employees, and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer.
Procurement Review Group Participation. The Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) for PG&E includes the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA”), the Utility Reform Network (“TURN”), the California Utility Employees (“CUE”), Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), Union of Concerned Scientists (“UCS”), and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer. On October 21, 2009, this transaction was presented to the PRG as part of the shortlist offer from the 2009 RPS Solicitation. The Project was subsequently presented to the PRG as part of the regular RPS update on April 9, 2010; June 24, 2010; August 13, 2010; and October 8, 2010, as a priority transaction. No objections were raised by members of the PRG. PG&E further addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A.
Procurement Review Group Participation. The Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) for PG&E includes the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), Union of Concerned Scientists (“UCS”), The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”), the California Utility Employees (“CUE”), and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer. The PRG was informed of the Original PPA on August 14, 2009, and of the Amended PPA on July 20, 2011, December 1, 2011, and December 13, 2011. Additional information concerning the PRG response to the Amended PPA is provided in Confidential Appendix A.
Procurement Review Group Participation. The PRG for PG&E consists of: California Department of Water Resources, the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, The Utility Reform Network, the California Utility Employees, and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E xxxxxxxxx. While the PRG was briefed on projects resulting from the 2007 RPS Solicitation since the initial short list was presented to the PRG on July 16, 2007, PG&E informed its PRG of the Original PPA on August 14, 2009. The PPA was presented to the PRG on May 17, 2011. PG&E further addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix D.
