Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings Sample Clauses

Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings. When more than one Party requests the establishment of an arbitration panel with respect to the same measure and based on the same legal grounds, whenever possible, a single arbitration panel shall be established to examine such requests.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings. If any Dispute has been referred to arbitration pursuant to Condition 20(b) (Arbitration), and another related dispute, controversy or claim has also been referred to arbitration pursuant to Condition 20(b) (Arbitration) or under the terms of the Fiscal Agency Agreement (together the “Related Arbitrations”), then, at any time after the arbitral tribunal has been appointed in relation to any one Related Arbitration (the “Appointed Tribunal”) and before the arbitral tribunal has been appointed in relation to the other Related Arbitration, any party to each of the Related Arbitrations may, after giving notice in writing to all parties to the Related Arbitrations, request that the Appointed Tribunal be appointed and have jurisdiction in relation to each of the Related Arbitrations, subject to the consent of the Appointed Tribunal and approval by the LCIA. In deciding whether to accept appointment in relation to any Related Arbitrations, the Appointed Tribunal shall consider whether the arbitrations raise common or related issues of law or fact and whether its appointment in the Related Arbitrations would serve the interests of justice and efficiency. Where the same arbitral tribunal has been appointed in relation to two or more Related Arbitrations pursuant to this Condition 20(c) (Consolidation of arbitration proceedings), the arbitral tribunal may, after consulting all parties to the Related Arbitrations, order that the whole or part of the matters at issue be heard together upon such terms or conditions as it sees fit.
Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings. (Not applicable for Captiive Mode)
Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings. When a party to a Transaction Document submits a Request for Arbitration (as defined in the ICC Rules) in connection with a legal relationship in respect of which arbitration proceedings between the parties to the same or another Transaction Document are already pending under the ICC Rules (an “Already Pending Proceeding”), the parties to such Transaction Document may request that the Court include the claims contained in the request (the “New Claims”) in the Already Pending Proceeding. If a party to a Transaction Document makes such a request before the Terms of Reference (as defined in the ICC Rules) have been signed or approved by the Court in the Already Pending Proceeding, pursuant to Article 4(6) of the ICC Rules, the Court shall determine whether to include the New Claims in the Already Pending Proceeding. If a party to a Transaction Document makes such a request after the Terms of Reference in the Already Pending Proceeding have been signed or approved by the Court, pursuant to Article 19 of the ICC Rules, the Arbitral Tribunal (as defined in the ICC Rules) in the Already Pending Proceeding shall determine whether to include the New Claims in the Already Pending Proceeding. For the avoidance of doubt, two (2) or more arbitration proceedings may be consolidated in accordance with this Section 10.9(e) under Articles 4(6) or 19 of the ICC Rules, even if the parties to such arbitration proceedings are not identical.
Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings. If more than one arbitration is commenced under this Agreement, and any Party contends that two or more such arbitrations raise similar issues of law or fact and that the issues should be resolved in one set of proceedings, then: (i) the parties to such arbitrations shall agree to consolidation and jointly request the Arbitration Court to consolidate them pursuant to Article 10, paragraph (a) of the Rules; or (ii) where the parties to such arbitrations fail to make the joint request under this Section 23.7 letter i) above within 15 days of one party making the above contention, any party to such arbitrations may request the Arbitration Court to consolidate them pursuant to Article 10 of the Rules. If the Arbitration Court decides to consolidate two or more arbitrations following the request made pursuant to this Section 23.7 or otherwise in accordance with the Rules, the tribunal in such consolidated proceedings shall be selected as follows: (i) the parties to the consolidated proceedings shall agree on the composition of the tribunal; and (ii) failing such agreement within 30 days of consolidation being decided by the Arbitration Court, they shall be consolidated into the arbitration that commenced first in accordance with Article 10 of the Rules. Any Party to the consolidated proceedings shall be bound by the award rendered, even if it chooses not to participate in the consolidated proceedings.

Related to Consolidation of Arbitration Proceedings

  • Initiation of Arbitration Pursuant to Section 110 of the Arbitration Act, the parties agree that a party may initiate Arbitration by giving written notice to the other party (“Arbitration Notice”) in the same manner that notice is permitted under Section 9.13 of the Agreement; provided, however, that the Arbitration Notice may not be given by email or fax. Arbitration will be deemed initiated as of the date that the Arbitration Notice is deemed delivered to such other party under Section 9.13 of the Agreement (the “Service Date”). After the Service Date, information may be delivered, and notices may be given, by email or fax pursuant to Section 9.13 of the Agreement or any other method permitted thereunder. The Arbitration Notice must describe the nature of the controversy, the remedies sought, and the election to commence Arbitration proceedings. All Claims in the Arbitration Notice must be pleaded consistent with the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.

  • Location of Arbitration The arbitration shall take place in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and the arbitrator shall issue any award at the place of arbitration. The arbitrator may conduct hearings and meetings at any other place agreeable to the parties or, upon the motion of a party, determined by the arbitrator as necessary to obtain significant testimony or evidence.

  • Arbitration Proceedings Arbitration between the parties will be subject to the following:

  • Alternative Arbitration Proceedings Alternatively, the Parties may refer the matter to the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) which offers a neutral venue for the conduct of national and international arbitration with commitment to providing institutional support to the arbitral process.

  • Expenses of Arbitration Each party shall pay one-half of the fees and expenses of the Arbitrator.

  • Rules of Arbitration The arbitration procedures initiated under this Contract shall operate under the arbitration rules in effect for ICSID, the Additional Facility or UNCITRAL, as the case may be, at the time of the filing of the request for arbitration, which rules are deemed to be incorporated herein by reference in this Article 26.

  • Transparency of Arbitral Proceedings 1. Subject to paragraphs 2 and 3, the disputing Member State may make publicly available all awards, and decisions produced by the tribunal. 2. Any of the disputing parties that intend to use information designated as confidential information in a hearing shall so advise the tribunal. The tribunal shall make appropriate arrangements to protect the information from disclosure. 3. Any information specifically designated as confidential that is submitted to the tribunal or the disputing parties shall be protected from disclosure to the public. 4. A disputing party may disclose to persons directly connected with the arbitral proceedings such confidential information as it considers necessary for the preparation of its case, but it shall require that such confidential information is protected. 5. The tribunal shall not require a Member State to furnish or allow access to information the disclosure of which would impede law enforcement or would be contrary to the Member States law protecting Cabinet confidences, personal privacy or the financial affairs and accounts of individual customers of financial institutions, or which it determines to be contrary to its essential security. 6. The non-disputing Member State shall be entitled, at its cost, to receive from the disputing Member State a copy of the notice of arbitration, no later than 30 days after the date that such document has been delivered to the disputing Member State. The disputing Member State shall notify all other Member States of the receipt of the notice of arbitration within 30 days thereof.

  • Cost of Arbitration The fees for a single Arbitrator or a Chair of a Board of Arbitration shall be shared equally by the parties. Other costs incurred by each party shall be the responsibility of that party.

  • Scope of Arbitration The Executive expressly understands and agrees that claims subject to arbitration under this section include asserted violations of the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act; the Older Worker’s Benefit Protection Act; the Americans with Disabilities Act; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as amended); the Family and Medical Leave Act; any law prohibiting discrimination, harassment or retaliation in employment; any claim of promissory estoppel or detrimental reliance, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress; or the public policy of any state, or any federal, state or local law.

  • Mediation and Arbitration of Disputes An Addendum requiring the Mediation and/or the Arbitration of all disputes between the Parties and/or Brokers arising out of this Lease ¨ is x is not attached to this Lease. LESSOR AND LESSEE HAVE CAREFULLY READ AND REVIEWED THIS LEASE AND EACH TERM AND PROVISION CONTAINED HEREIN, AND BY THE EXECUTION OF THIS LEASE SHOW THEIR INFORMED AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT THERETO. THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE THAT, AT THE TIME THIS LEASE IS EXECUTED, THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE ARE COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE AND EFFECTUATE THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF LESSOR AND LESSEE WITH RESPECT TO THE PREMISES. ATTENTION: NO REPRESENTATION OR RECOMMENDATION IS MADE BY THE AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION OR BY ANY BROKER AS TO THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY, LEGAL EFFECT, OR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE OR THE TRANSACTION TO WHICH IT RELATES. THE PARTIES ARE URGED TO: 1. SEEK ADVICE OF COUNSEL AS TO THE LEGAL AND TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE. 2. RETAIN APPROPRIATE CONSULTANTS TO REVIEW AND INVESTIGATE THE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES. SAID INVESTIGATION SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: THE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, THE ZONING OF THE PREMISES, THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, THE CONDITION OF THE ROOF AND OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND THE SUITABILITY OF THE PREMISES FOR LESSEE’S INTENDED USE.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!