COST MITIGATION Sample Clauses

COST MITIGATION. In accordance with RCW 35.58.262, some Purchasers have the right to employ various cost mitigation strategies (i.e. hedging) in acquiring fuel via contractors. These strategies may include to futures contracts, swap transactions, option contracts, costless collars, and long-term storage. Purchasers who elect to utilize these cost-mitigation strategies may be charged a fee or other funding mechanisms to cover the cost to deploy these strategies. Enterprise Services accepts no responsibility for these services provided to Purchasers under RCW 35.58.262 under the Master Contract.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COST MITIGATION. The Parties shall use their best efforts to minimize the cost of any Government-Mandated Capital Project and any Government-Mandated Operating Expenses, to evaluate equitable methods to share the risk, and to assess costs to the appropriate users or beneficiaries of such projects and expenses. Such efforts notwithstanding, the total amount of Government-Mandated Capital Project annual amortized costs and Government- Mandated Operating Expenses to be added to the Total Landing Contributions, Total Domestic Terminal Contributions, Total International Terminal Contributions and Total Local Terminal Contributions, as applicable, shall equal the total annual amortized costs of the project and those expenses actually incurred by the Lessee.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
COST MITIGATION. If the transition is implemented pursuant to Section ‎13.5(A)(1) or ‎13.5(A)(2), Distributor will work in good faith where reasonably possible to help reduce ExxonMobil’s costs during any Transition Period.
Sample 1

Related to COST MITIGATION

  • Mitigation Executive shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment or benefit provided for in this Agreement by seeking other employment or otherwise and there shall be no offset against amounts due Executive under this Agreement on account of any remuneration attributable to any subsequent employment that Executive may obtain.

  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors The penalties in this matter were determined in consideration of all relevant circumstances, including statutory factors as described in CARB’s Enforcement Policy. CARB considered whether the violator came into compliance quickly and cooperated with the investigation; the extent of harm to public health, safety and welfare; nature and persistence of the violation, including the magnitude of the excess emissions; compliance history; preventative efforts taken; innovative nature and the magnitude of the effort required to comply, and the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the available test methods; efforts to attain, or provide for, compliance prior to violation; action taken to mitigate the violation; financial burden to the violator; and voluntary disclosure. The penalties are set at levels sufficient to deter violations, to remove any economic benefit or unfair advantage from noncompliance, to obtain swift compliance, and the potential costs, risks, and uncertainty associated with litigation. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger depending on the unique circumstances of the case.

  • Mitigation Measures Company shall take commercially reasonable measures (except measures causing it to incur out-of-pocket expenses which BNYM does not agree in advance to reimburse) to mitigate losses or potential losses to BNYM, including taking verification, validation and reconciliation measures that are commercially reasonable or standard practice in the Company’s business.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!