CPUC Decision Sample Clauses

CPUC Decision. On October 28, 2016 the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued D.00-00-000 (2016 Decision) approving, among other things, budget to fund implementation of activities through 2025. The budget was reaffirmed by the CPUC in D.18- 05-041, issued on June 5, 2018. These Decisions also directed Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) to enter into an annual contract with ABAG to provide funding for the activities identified in the existing and revised BayREN Program Implementation Plans (PIP).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CPUC Decision. On October 28, 2015 the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued D.00-00-000 (2016 Decision) approving, among other things, a BayREN Program Implementation Plan for 2016 (2016 PIP) and budget to fund implementation of the 2016 PIP (2016 Budget). The CPUC has the authority to modify the 2016 PIP through its official proceedings. The Decision also directed Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) to enter into a contract with BayREN to provide funding for the 2016 PIP. The 2016 Decision can be found here: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M155/K511/155511942.pdf
Sample 1
CPUC Decision. The September 23, 2013 Decision by the CPUC regulating TNCs as charter party carriers. The Decision, as may be amended or supplemented while this License is in effect is incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full form.
Sample 1
CPUC Decision. On October 28, 2016 the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued D.00-00-000 (2016 Decision) approving, among other things, budget to fund implementation of activities through 2025. The Decision also directed Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) to enter into an annual contract with BayREN to provide funding for the activities identified in the existing PIP.
Sample 1

Related to CPUC Decision

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Shared Decision Making 33-1 Purpose The purpose of a shared decision making program is to create an atmosphere in which decision making is a collegial, shared, process that fosters an exchange of ideas and information necessary for effective professional practice and for improved student performance. The Association and District agree to continue pursuing jointly the implementation of legitimately recognized school councils as a foundation of a shared decision-making program. All provisions of this Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect throughout the process.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision 5.18.3.3.1 The Arbitrator's decision and award shall be in writing and shall state concisely the reasons for the award, including the Arbitrator's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.