Cross-validation Sample Clauses

Cross-validation classification performance predicting mental health and QoL deterioration at M12 based on M0 and M3 data‌ 1.2.3.1.1. Prediction of Mental health deterioration‌ As shown in Table FI, Model 2 correctly predicted one-year mental health deterioration for 84% of patients. Moreover, the model identified the patients who had stable good mental health status at M12 with approximately 85% certainty. The shape of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve shown in Figure F2 (AUC=0.876) illustrates a fair balance between sensitivity and specificity. Most important predictors included variables measured shortly after disease diagnosis, as well as variables reported at the 3-month follow-up (that is, during treatment; see Figure F3). They comprised life-style characteristics (at least moderate, regular exercise), trait resilience and other psychological characteristics presumed to be associated with illness adaptation, emotional status of the patient (particularly on month 3), and specific, illness-related physical symptoms. In addition, three biological variables ranked among the important predictors: thrombocyte count, NLR, and serum creatinine levels (although the latter did not vary significantly between groups; see Table FII). Descriptive statistics of the selected continuous variables are shown in Table FΙII, whereas group data on exercise at M0, which also emerged as an important predictor, is shown in Table FIV. As expected, the Stable Mental health group reported significantly lower symptomatology and better global QoL at both M0 and M3 (p<0.001). Basic sociodemographic characteristics of the two groups are listed in Table FIV.
Sample 1
Cross-validation classification performance predicting mental health and QoL deterioration at M18 based on M0 and M3 data‌ 1.2.3.2.1. Prediction of Mental health deterioration‌ As shown in Table FV, Model 6 correctly predicted 18-month overall mental health deterioration for 76% of patients. Moreover, the model identified the patients who maintained mild symptomatology through M18 with approximately 77% certainty (AUC=0.853; see Figure F6). As in the case of the prediction of M12 mental health deterioration both M0 and M3 variables featured among the highest-ranking ones (see Figure F7). They comprised primarily of psychological characteristics presumed to be associated with illness adaptation (such as optimism, perceived emotional support by others, and coping styles) as well as emotional status and subjective QoL of the patient (particularly on month 3). Importantly, the two biological indices which were among the top-ranking variables in predicting M12 mental health deterioration, also feature among the most important features in Model 6 (NLR and platelet count at M0). In addition, at least moderate exercise at the time of diagnosis, absence of treatment side effects and physical symptoms, and engaging in well-being promoting activities at M3 also contributing to remaining free of symptoms of anxiety and depression one and half year post diagnosis.
Sample 1

Related to Cross-validation

  • Validation In respect to applications for leave made pursuant to this Article, the employee may be required to provide satisfactory validation of the circumstances necessitating such requests.

  • Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention and Control The hospital in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) shall develop, establish and put into effect, musculoskeletal prevention and control measures, procedures, practices and training for the health and safety of employees.

  • Contract Supremacy In the case of a conflict between the express terms of this Agreement and the terms of the ISO Agreement, the express terms of this Agreement shall prevail.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • Agreement Xxx 0000 The Company shall not produce iron ore under this Agreement for transportation in any calendar year in excess of the approved production limit nor shall the total number of the mine workforce exceed the approved mine workforce without the prior consent in principle of the Minister and, subject to that consent, approval of detailed proposals in regard thereto in accordance with this Clause.

  • MAINTENANCE OF STANDARDS The Employer agrees, subject to the following provisions, that all conditions of employment in his/her individual operation relating to wages, hours of work, overtime differentials and general working conditions shall be maintained at not less than the highest standards in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement, and the conditions of employment shall be improved whenever specific provisions for improvement are made elsewhere in this Agreement.

  • PROTECTION OF WORK 12.1 Subcontractor shall effectually secure and protect the work done hereunder and assume full responsibility for the condition thereof until final acceptance by the OWNER and Contractor. Subcontractor further agrees to provide such protection as is necessary to protect the work and the workmen of Contractor, the OWNER, and other subcontractors from its operations. 12.2 Subcontractor shall be liable for any loss or damage to any work in place or to any equipment and materials on the job site caused by Subcontractor or its agents, employees or guests.

  • Assignment and Subcontracting City and Consultant recognize and agree that this Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a determination of Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant. Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors listed in the Consultant’s proposal, without prior written approval of the City.

  • Technical Safeguards 1. USAC and DSS will process the data matched and any data created by the match under the immediate supervision and control of authorized personnel to protect the confidentiality of the data, so unauthorized persons cannot retrieve any data by computer, remote terminal, or other means. 2. USAC and DSS will strictly limit authorization to these electronic data areas necessary for the authorized user to perform their official duties. All data in transit will be encrypted using algorithms that meet the requirements of the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 140-2 or 140-3 (when applicable). 3. Authorized system users will be identified by User ID and password, and individually tracked to safeguard against the unauthorized access and use of the system. System logs of all user actions will be saved, tracked and monitored periodically. 4. USAC will transmit data to DSS via encrypted secure file delivery system. For each request, a response will be sent back to USAC to indicate success or failure of transmission.

  • Outsourcing 28.1. The Company provides its Clients with trading services using an internet based trading system. The Company has outsourced the development, physical hosting, maintenance and updating of its online Trading Platform to a foreign entity. The Company’s Clients will not have any direct contact with this entity and the Company will take all reasonable steps to ensure the security of all the data regarding the identity of its Clients. The Client hereby acknowledges and accepts the fact that the Company outsources such activities.