Disputes Regarding Conformance to Specifications Sample Clauses

Disputes Regarding Conformance to Specifications. If Iridex does not agree with Topcon or its designee’s determination that a Product is a Nonconforming Product, Iridex shall respond in writing to a rejection notice from Topcon or its designee within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of such rejection notice, and then Iridex and Topcon shall discuss in good faith and each use its commercially reasonable efforts to resolve such disagreement as promptly as possible. Without limiting the foregoing, Iridex and Topcon shall discuss in good faith mutually acceptable testing procedures pursuant to which both Iridex and Topcon will re-test a sample of the disputed Product to determine whether such Product complies with the warranties set forth in Section 9.1, at the Parties’ shared cost (i.e., 50/50); provided, that if, as a result of such re-test, such Product was determined (a) to be a Nonconforming Product, Iridex shall bear the full amount of such re-test, or (b) not to be a Nonconforming Product, Topcon shall bear the full amount of such re-test. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Iridex and Topcon are unable to resolve such disagreement within sixty (60) days of the date of the applicable rejection notice, either Party may submit a sample of the allegedly non-conforming Product for tests and a determination as to whether or not such Product conforms to the warranties given by Iridex in Section 9.1 to an independent testing organization, or to a consultant of recognized repute within the United States or Japanese medical device industry, in either case agreed in writing by the Parties, such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed by either Party. The determination of such organization or consultant with respect to all or part of any shipment of Product shall be final and binding upon the Parties. The fees and expenses of such organization or consultant making such determination shall be borne by the Party in error.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Disputes Regarding Conformance to Specifications

  • Quality Specifications SANMINA-SCI shall comply with the quality specifications set forth in its Quality Manual, incorporated by reference herein, a copy of which is available from SANMINA-SCI upon request.

  • Review and Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation (i) to determine whether a Delinquency Trigger has occurred, (ii) to determine whether the required percentage of Noteholders has voted to direct a Review, (iii) to determine which Receivables are subject to a Review, (iv) to obtain or confirm the validity of the Review Materials, (v) to obtain missing or insufficient Review Materials (except to the extent set forth in Section 3.04), or (vi) to take any action or cause any other party to take any action under any of the Basic Documents to enforce any remedies for breaches of any Eligible Representations. The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the Tests provided in Exhibit A and will have no obligation to perform additional testing procedures on any ARR Receivables or to consider any additional information provided by any party. The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation to provide reporting or information in addition to that described in Section 3.07. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may review and report on additional information that it determines in good faith to be material to its performance under this ARR Agreement and may re-perform a Review with respect to an ARR Receivable as contemplated by Section 3.09. The Issuing Entity expressly agrees that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not advising the Issuing Entity or any Noteholder or any investor or future investor concerning the suitability of the Notes or any investment strategy. The Issuing Entity expressly acknowledges and agrees that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not an expert in accounting, tax, regulatory, or legal matters, and that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not providing legal advice as to any matter.

  • Changes to Specifications All Specifications and any changes thereto agreed to by the parties from time to time shall be in writing, dated and signed by the parties. Any change to the Process shall be deemed a Specification change. No change in the Specifications shall be implemented by Catalent, whether requested by Client or requested or required by any Regulatory Authority, until the parties have agreed in writing to such change, the implementation date of such change, and any increase or decrease in costs, expenses or fees associated with such change (including any change to Unit Pricing). Catalent shall respond promptly to any request made by Client for a change in the Specifications, and both parties shall use commercially reasonable, good faith efforts to agree to the terms of such change in a timely manner. As soon as possible after a request is made for any change in Specifications, Catalent shall notify Client of the costs associated with such change and shall provide such supporting documentation as Client may reasonably require. Client shall pay all costs associated with such agreed upon changes. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of the Specifications, this Agreement shall control. Catalent reserves the right to postpone effecting changes to the Specifications until such time as the parties agree to and execute the required written amendment.

  • Technical Specifications Each Bloom System is an integrated system comprised of a fuel cell stack assembly and associated balance of plant components that converts a fuel into electricity using electrochemical means that (i) has a Nameplate Capacity of at least 0.5 kilowatts of electricity using an electrochemical process and (ii) has an electricity-only generation efficiency greater than thirty percent (30%).

  • Amendments to Clarify and Correct Errors and Defects The parties may amend this Agreement to clarify an ambiguity, correct an error or correct or supplement any term of this Agreement that may be defective or inconsistent with the other terms of this Agreement, in each case, without the consent of the Noteholders, the Certificateholders or any other Person. The parties may amend any term or provision of this Agreement from time to time for the purpose of conforming the terms of this Agreement to the description thereof in the Prospectus, without the consent of Noteholders, the Certificateholders or any other Person.

  • Quality Standards Each Party agrees that the nature and quality of its products and services supplied in connection with the other Party's Marks will conform to quality standards set by the other Party. Each Party agrees to supply the other Party, upon request, with a reasonable number of samples of any Materials publicly disseminated by such Party which utilize the other Party's Marks. Each Party will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and customs and obtain any required government approvals pertaining to use of the other Party's marks.

  • Quality Agreement Each Party will comply with the terms of the Quality Agreement in the performance of its obligations hereunder including record retention, audits and inspections, change control, adverse events and product recall. The Parties will conduct periodic Product quality reviews in accordance with the terms of the Quality Agreement.

  • Computational Materials and Structural Term Sheets (a) Not later than 10:30 a.m., New York time, on the business day before the date on which the Current Report relating to the Offered Certificates of a Series is required to be filed by the Company with the Commission pursuant to Section 5(b) hereof, the Underwriter shall deliver to the Company five complete copies of all materials provided by the Underwriter to prospective investors in such Offered Certificates that constitute (i) "Computational Materials" within the meaning of the no-action letter dated May 20, 1994 issued by the Division of Corporation Finance of the Commission to Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Acceptance Corporation I, Xxxxxx, Peabody & Co. Incorporated, and Xxxxxx Structured Asset Corporation and the no-action letter dated May 27, 1994 issued by the Division of Corporation Finance of the Commission to the Public Securities Association (together, the "Xxxxxx Letters"), the filing of which material is a condition of the relief granted in such letter (such materials being the "Computational Materials"), and (ii) "Structural Term Sheets" within the meaning of the no-action letter dated February 17, 1995 issued by the Division of Corporation Finance of the Commission to the Public Securities Association (the "PSA Letter"), the filing of which material is a condition of the relief granted in such letter (such materials being the "Structural Term Sheets"). Each delivery of Computational Materials and Structural Term Sheets to the Company pursuant to this paragraph (a) shall be effected by delivering four copies of such materials to counsel for the Company on behalf of the Company at the address specified in Section 3 hereof and one copy of such materials to the Company.

  • Quality Service Standards/NAV Errors Price Associates and the Fund may, from time to time, agree to certain quality service standards, with respect to the Services hereunder. In the event Price Associates is the party responsible for causing an error in the computation of the net asset value for a Fund or share class of a Fund (“NAV Error”), the actions that are required to be taken as to such NAV Error shall be made in accordance with the Fund’s Net Asset Value Error Correction Policy and Procedures (“NAV Error Policy”) attached hereto as Schedule II.

  • Environmental Compliance and Conditions Except as set forth on Schedule 3.16:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.