Dissertation goals Sample Clauses

Dissertation goals. The aim of this dissertation is to begin forming a general theory of agreement. We have four goals: 1. Develop a taxonomic framework to organize the realm of agreement problems under a common ter- minology and conceptual framework in order to find the common processes as well as formalize the differences between agreement problems. 2. To begin to understand the fundamental interactions between information, cost and time in agreement problems. 3. Characterize some aspects of linguistic agreement as an instance of an agreement problem. 4. Explore agreement in complex, constrained state spaces where there are significant limitations to the cognitive and communicative capabilities of agents. The multitude of agreement problems is a testament to the ubiquity of agreement problems in many domains; however because of the lack of a common conceptual framework there is a wide variety of notations, assumptions, and ways of viewing the same agreement problem. In order to create a general theory of agreement we need to have a common conceptual framework in which all agreement problems can be cast. We call this the development of a taxonomic framework because we are using the framework as a way of classifying agreement problems. Communication leads to information, and information is what allows agreement to occur. Most studies, with some notable exceptions3, however, fail to consider the cost of communication in developing and analyzing agreement protocols. The fundamental tradeoff between cost, information and time to agreement is critical to understand. Agreement problems occur in numerous social systems. Under our overarching taxonomic framework we hope to capture the properties of linguistic agreement problems. The benefit will be twofold: 1. Providing a formal model in which to study linguistic processes; 2. Inspiring new avenues of research in MAPs. While there has been much work on understanding the impact of communication constraints on agreement there has been relatively little work on understanding agreement in complex state spaces. This is a critical aspect of being able to model more complex social systems, like language.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dissertation goals. This dissertation will begin to fill in gaps in the understanding of oxytocin circuitry and how it is involved in affiliative behaviors in female prairie voles. In chapter 2, I investigate the hypothesis that differences in OTR density in the NAcc directly contributes to individual differences in affiliative behaviors. By using an adeno- associated viral vector carrying the prairie vole OTR gene, the levels of OTR in the NAcc of adult female prairie voles was increased. These females were then tested for alloparental and partner preference behaviors. Accumbal OTR was also increased in female meadow voles to determine if OTR in this reward area can influence affiliative behavior in a non-monagoumous species. In chapter 3, we characterized the oxytocin system that influences these affiliative behaviors by using retrograde tract tracing, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. I conclude this thesis by discussing how the central OT system may be organized to promote the coordination of peripheral physiology and behavioral changes associated with reproduction. This chapter presents work published as: Xxxx HE, Xxxxxxx XX, Xxxxxxx LL, Ren X, Xxxxxxxxxxx E, and XX Xxxxx. 2009. Variation in oxytocin receptor density in the nucleus accumbens has differential effects on affiliative behaviors in monogamous and polygamous voles. J Neurosci. Feb 4;29(5):3112-3119.
Dissertation goals. The purpose of the studies described in this dissertation were to identify functional roles for GPR37 and GPR37L1 in models of disease. Chapter 2 of the dissertation establishes an association between a variant in GPR37L1 (c.1047G>T [Lys349Asp]) with a novel progressive myoclonic epilepsy. Although no striking differences were observed between GPR37L1 and the K349N variant in transfected cells, loss of Gpr37L1 in vivo resulted in increased seizures susceptibility in two seizure induction paradigms. Additionally, mice lacking the closely related receptor, GPR37 also resulted in increased seizure susceptibility in a seizure induction paradigm and elicited spontaneous seizures. Finally, mice lacking both Gpr37 and Gpr37L1 are much more susceptible to seizures than single knockout mice and elicit significantly longer spontaneous seizures than mice lacking only GPR37. Chapter 3 discusses the role of GPR37 in models of ischemic stroke. It was found that loss of GPR37 results in a larger infarct volume after induction of focal cerebral ischemia. Interestingly, Gpr37 expression increases dramatically in the penumbra region following the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model of ischemic stroke. Xxxxxxx, XXX00X0 expression is significantly reduced in the penumbra following MCAO in WT, but not Gpr37-/- mice. Loss of Gpr37 also resulted in attenuated expression of the hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) and the astrocytic marker glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP), but not the microglial marker, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1). Furthermore, primary astrocytes cultured from Gpr37-/- mice were more susceptible oxygen glucose deprivation, an in vitro model of stroke, than wild type (WT) astrocytes. The final chapter of this dissertation discusses the larger implications of the data presented in Chapters 2 and 3. GPR37L1 Modulates Seizure Susceptibility: Evidence from Mouse Studies and Analyses of a Human GPR37L1 Variant This chapter is adapted in part from: Xxxxxxx, X.X., Xxxx, X.X., Xxxxxxxxx, X.X., Xxxxxx, E.G., Xxxxx, X.X., Owino, S., Xxxxx, X.X., Xxxxx, X.X., Xxxxxxxx, C., XxXxxxxx, X.X., Xxxxxxxxxxx, D., Xxxxxx, A., and Xxxx, X.X. GPR37L1 Modulates Seizure Susceptibility: Evidence from Mouse Studies and Analyses of a Human GPR37L1 Variant. Submitted.

Related to Dissertation goals

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Bonus Programs Employee may participate in any incentive program which may be made available from time to time to Corporation’s employees at Employee’s level; provided, however, that Employee’s participation is subject to the applicable terms, conditions and eligibility requirements of the program, as they may exist from time to time.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Performance Period This Agreement shall be performed during the period which begins Oct 01 2020 and ends Sep 30 2022. All services under this Agreement must be rendered within this performance period, unless directly specified under a written change or extension provisioned under Article 14, which shall be fully executed by both parties to this Agreement.

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Performance Goal (a) Subject to the following sentence, the Performance Goal is set out in Appendix A hereto, which Appendix A is incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of Section 13 or any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee reserves the right to unilaterally change or otherwise modify the Performance Goal in any manner whatsoever (including substituting a new Performance Goal). If the Committee exercises such discretionary authority to any extent, the Committee shall provide the Grantee with a new Appendix A in substitution for the Appendix A attached hereto, and such new Appendix A and the Performance Goal set out therein (rather than the Appendix A attached hereto and the Performance Goal set out therein) shall in all events apply for all purposes of this Agreement. (b) Depending upon the extent, if any, to which the Performance Goal has been achieved, and subject to compliance with the requirements of Section 4, each PSU shall entitle the Grantee to receive, at such time as is determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 5, between 0 and 2.0 Shares for each PSU. The Committee shall, as soon as practicable following the last day of the Performance Period, certify (i) the extent, if any, to which, in accordance with Appendix A, the Performance Goal has been achieved with respect to the Performance Period and (ii) the number of whole and/or partial Shares, if any, which, subject to compliance with the vesting requirements of Section 4, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive with respect to each PSU (with such number of whole and/or partial Shares being hereafter referred to as the “Share Delivery Factor”). Such certification shall be final, conclusive and binding on the Grantee, and on all other persons, to the maximum extent permitted by law.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!