We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Distributed detection of anomalies Sample Clauses

Distributed detection of anomalies. 5.3.2.1 Performance objectives, and evaluation criteria 5.3.2.2 Methodology: scenarios and tools 5.3.2.3 Experimental results
Distributed detection of anomalies. The classical setting in networking generally assumes that the information that is exchanged is statistically independent. However very frequently this is not strictly the case and nodes do exchange information that is correlated. Distributed anomaly detection has to deal precisely with such a setting: each monitoring node in the network maintains a vector of numerical state information. As the different monitoring nodes observe interacting traffics the state maintained by them is correlated. Distributed monitoring and anomaly detection involves exchanging information between nodes such that each node obtains an approximate view of the states of all other nodes. Through the information exchanged the local observation of a node is extended to the global state of the network. One important challenge here is to deal with nodes selfishness, i.e. a node wants to achieve the best approximation of other nodes states consuming itself the lowest amount of resources. This means that we need an incentive/punishment cooperative mechanism to motivate node to exchange information. One should also assume that the quality of approximation about other states is not defined a priori; it needs to be defined online during the operation of the distributed system. The distributed anomaly detection, a communication scheme initially designed by Lancaster University enables the sharing of correlated node states; a punishment scheme has been proposed that solves the node selfishness issue; a signalling method has been proposed that enables a node to announce to other nodes its state variable of interest as well as their importance. The proposed scheme merges approximation obtained at different nodes into a single consistent approximation with better quality. We will show that the proposed scheme implements a negotiation between neighbours that trade-off an increase of the node transmission rate to its neighbour with a mechanism achieving a better approximation of the state of other nodes.
Distributed detection of anomalies. The integration of the distributed anomaly detection component into the global ECODE architecture is taking advantage of all parts of the architecture. Two major parts of the overall ECODE architecture cooperate during the distributed anomaly detection: the MLE (machine learning engine) and the ME (Monitoring Engine). However there is a major interaction between distant MLE in our case.
Distributed detection of anomalies. The class of parametric statistical anomaly detectors needs to implement three phases: 1. A modelling phase that consists of capturing essential correlation structure of the state vector to monitor. This phase has a strong machine learning flavour and generally uses statistical model calibration techniques as Expectation Minimization to implement Maximum Likelihood fitting or Principal Component Analysis to derive approximate low dimensional models. 2. A filtering phase that consists of using the correlation structure model obtained in the first phase in order to reduce the entropy of the observation by removing the information’s irrelevant to anomaly detection. The approach assumes that everything that goes along with the correlation structure obtained in the first phase is irrelevant to anomaly detection. 3. A decision phase that takes the signal filtered in the second phase and applies to it a statistical test that will decide if there was an anomaly somewhere in the network or not. These three phases are now well investigated in the centralized case where all observations are available at a single point. However, moving from a centralized setting to a distributed setting -our ambition in this project- necessitates implementing the two above defined phases in a distributed way. Our machine learning approach consisted of developing distributed machine learning techniques to deal with distributed modelling. The approach followed consisted of developing a network wide state-sharing scheme that enables each node to obtain an approximation with a controllable precision of other nodes states. This approximation is obtained through a distributed optimization that could be seen as a distributed Principal Component Analysis; a technique widely used in centralized machine learning. This technique was chosen because of the nice and rich theoretical framework that exists around it.

Related to Distributed detection of anomalies

  • Meteorological Data Reporting Requirement (Applicable to wind generation facilities only)

  • Random Drug Testing All employees covered by this Agreement shall be subject to random drug testing in accordance with Appendix D.

  • Data Subjects The categories of Data Subjects who we may collect Personal Data about may include the following where they are a natural person: the Customer, the directors and ultimate beneficial owner(s) of the Customer, your customers, employees and contractors, payers and payees. You may share with Airwallex some or all of the following types of Personal Data regarding Data Subjects: • full name; • email address; • phone number and other contact information; • date of birth; • nationality; • public information about the data subject; • other relevant verification or due diligence documentation as required under these terms; and • any other data that is necessary or relevant to carry out the Agreed Purposes.

  • DATA LOSS The Company does not accept responsibility for the security of Your account or content. You agree that Your use of the Website or Services is at Your own risk.

  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Testing This plan covers human leukocyte antigen testing for A, B, and DR antigens once per member per lifetime to establish a member’s bone marrow transplantation donor suitability in accordance with R.I. General Law §27-20-36. The testing must be performed in a facility that is: • accredited by the American Association of Blood Banks or its successors; and • licensed under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act as it may be amended from time to time. At the time of testing, the person being tested must complete and sign an informed consent form that also authorizes the results of the test to be used for participation in the National Marrow Donor program.

  • SOURCE CODE ESCROW FOR LICENSED PRODUCT If Source Code or Source Code escrow is offered by either Contractor or Product manufacturer or developer to any other commercial customers, Contractor shall either: (i) provide Licensee with the Source Code for the Product; or (ii) place the Source Code in a third party escrow arrangement with a designated escrow agent who shall be named and identified to the State, and who shall be directed to release the deposited Source Code in accordance with a standard escrow agreement acceptable to the State; or (iii) will certify to the State that the Product manufacturer/developer has named the State, acting by and through the Authorized User, and the Licensee, as a named beneficiary of an established escrow arrangement with its designated escrow agent who shall be named and identified to the State and Licensee, and who shall be directed to release the deposited Source Code in accordance with the terms of escrow. Source Code, as well as any corrections or enhancements to such source code, shall be updated for each new release of the Product in the same manner as provided above and such updating of escrow shall be certified to the State in writing. Contractor shall identify the escrow agent upon commencement of the Contract term and shall certify annually that the escrow remains in effect in compliance with the terms of this clause. The State may release the Source Code to Licensees under this Contract who have licensed Product or obtained services, who may use such copy of the Source Code to maintain the Product.

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • Certificate of Analysis Seller shall provide a certificate of analysis and other documents as defined in the Quality Agreement for any Product to be released hereunder, in a form in accordance with the cGMPs and all other applicable Regulatory Requirements and Product Specifications and as shall be agreed upon by the parties. For any batch that initially failed to meet any Product Specification, the certificate of analysis shall document the exception. Products that do not meet dissolution specifications at USP Stage I and II testing shall not be accepted by Buyer (and such requirement shall be included in the Product Specifications/Quality Manual).

  • Data Loss Prevention DST shall implement a data leakage program that is designed to identify, detect, monitor and document Fund Data leaving DST’s control without authorization in place.

  • Distribution of UDP and TCP queries DNS probes will send UDP or TCP “DNS test” approximating the distribution of these queries.