Common use of DRAFT PROJECT REPORT Clause in Contracts

DRAFT PROJECT REPORT. Prepare and submit to the Grant Manager a draft Project Report for review and comment that includes and addresses the following narrative sections and items. Additional requirements are listed in Exhibit D. a. A summary of the Project, describing Project purpose, scope and goals, activities completed, techniques used and partners involved. b. A report of all monitoring and management practices or management measures implemented, together with their corresponding locations. The report shall be in a format that enables the Grant Manager to find the physical location of each implemented practice or measure and/or monitoring event in a quick and efficient manner. Acceptable formats include, but are not limited to: • Map of locations -The map of practices or measures implemented shall consist of dots placed on a USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map at the implementation location. Lead lines shall be connected to a text box description of the practice or measure. The dots shall have a small enough diameter to enable the Grant Manager to locate the measure or practice within a 50-foot radius. • Project coding system -The project coding system shall explain the coding used to describe each implemented practice or measure and include a reference to the corresponding GPS location(s). c. Describe Project performance, including benefits, successes and shortcomings, consistent with the PAEP. Enumerate specific quantifiable environmental changes and results of the Project. As appropriate, include 1) behavioral results such as the amount of management practices or measures implemented, 2) estimates or measurements of the amount of pollutants prevented from reaching surface or ground water, 3) documented changes in water quality based on monitoring, and 4) improved or protected beneficial uses. d. Identify lessons learned in carrying out the Project. Describe what worked and what did not work, and how similar efforts could be utilized within the Project area, as well as in other watersheds. e. Describe the extent of outreach that has been conducted and if there are plans to further promote the results of the Project to achieve additional implementation. f. Describe the Project's funding. Include the projected cost and actual cost of the Project, how much of the grant funds were spent, and how much funding was put into the Project from other sources. Identify funding sources that have been "leveraged" by the Project and plans for funding future activities. g. Identify planned or potential follow-up activities, such as any additional steps necessary to achieve the water quality objectives, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) or local watershed plans. h. Include appropriate photos and graphics. i. A list of items submitted as outlined in the Table of Items for Review. j. Any additional information that is deemed appropriate by the Project Director or Grant Manager.

DRAFT PROJECT REPORT. Prepare and submit to the Grant Manager a draft Project Report for review and comment that includes and addresses the following narrative sections and items. Additional requirements are listed in Exhibit D. a. A summary of the Project, describing Project purpose, scope and goals, activities completed, techniques used and partners involved. b. A report of all monitoring and management practices or management measures implemented, together with their corresponding locationsincluding identification of the stream reach affected by these activities. The report shall include all Project required water quality monitoring data as uploaded into CEDEN, and provided in both Microsoft Excel and pdf formats. The report must be in a format that enables precisely identifies monitoring and management measures locations so that the Grant Manager to find can easily identify the physical location of each implemented practice or measure and/or monitoring event in a quick and efficient manner. Acceptable formats include, but are not limited to: • Map of locations -The map of practices or measures implemented shall consist of dots placed on a USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map at the implementation location. Lead lines shall be connected to a text box description of the practice or measure. The dots shall have a small enough diameter to enable the Grant Manager to locate the measure or practice within a 50-foot radius. • Project coding system -The project coding system shall explain the coding used to describe each implemented practice or measure and include a reference to the corresponding GPS location(s)affected stream reach. c. b. Describe Project performance, including benefits, successes and shortcomings, consistent with the PAEP. Enumerate specific quantifiable environmental changes and results of the Project. As appropriate, include 1) behavioral results such as the amount of management practices or measures implemented, 2) estimates or measurements of the amount of pollutants prevented from reaching surface or ground water, 3) documented changes in water quality based on monitoring, and 4) improved or protected beneficial uses. d. c. Identify lessons learned in carrying out the Project. Describe what worked and what did not work, and how similar efforts could be utilized within the Project area, as well as in other watersheds. d. The Grantee shall include a separate analysis of the originally proposed load reductions and the actual amount of pollutants prevented from reaching surface and/or ground water. If the originally proposed Load Reductions were not achieved, the Grantee shall also identify and discuss all load reduction limiting factors and any possible future solutions. This information shall be included in both the Final Project Report and the Final Project Summary. e. Describe the extent of outreach that has been conducted and if there are plans to further promote the results of the Project to achieve additional implementation. f. Describe the Project's ’s funding. Include the projected cost and actual cost of the Project, how much of the grant funds were spent, and how much funding was put into the Project from other sources. Identify funding sources that have been "“leveraged" ” by the Project and plans for funding future activities. g. Identify planned or potential follow-up activities, such as any additional steps necessary to achieve the water quality objectives, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) or local watershed plans. h. Include appropriate photos and graphics. i. A list of items submitted as outlined in the Table of Items for Review. j. Any additional information that is deemed appropriate by the Project Director or Grant Manager.

DRAFT PROJECT REPORT. Prepare and submit to the Grant Manager Manager, for review and comment, a draft Project Report for review and comment that includes information collected by the recipient in accordance with the Project monitoring and addresses reporting plan, a determination of the effectiveness of the Project in preventing or reducing pollution, and the results of the monitoring program. The draft report shall address the following narrative sections and items. Additional requirements are listed in Exhibit D.. a. A summary of the Project, describing Project purpose, scope and goals, activities completed, techniques used and partners involved. b. A report of all monitoring and management practices or management measures implemented, together with their corresponding locations. The report shall include all Project required water quality monitoring data as uploaded into CEDEN, and provided in both Microsoft Excel and pdf formats. The report shall also be in a format that enables the Grant Manager to find the physical location of each implemented practice or measure and/or monitoring event in a quick and efficient manner. Acceptable formats include, but are not limited to: •  Map of locations -The – The map of practices or measures implemented shall consist of dots placed on a USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map at the implementation location. Lead lines shall be connected to a text box description of the practice or measure. The dots shall have a small enough diameter to enable the Grant Manager to locate the measure or practice within a 50-foot radius. •  Project coding system -The – The project coding system shall explain the coding used to describe each implemented practice or measure and include a reference to the corresponding GPS location(s). c. Describe Project performance, including benefits, successes and shortcomings, consistent with the PAEP. Enumerate specific quantifiable environmental changes and results of the Project. As appropriate, include 1) behavioral results such as the amount of management practices or measures implemented, 2) estimates or measurements of the amount of pollutants prevented from reaching surface or ground water, 3) documented changes in water quality based on monitoring, and 4) improved or protected beneficial uses. d. Identify lessons learned in carrying out the Project. Describe what worked and what did not work, and how similar efforts could be utilized within the Project area, as well as in other watersheds. e. Describe the extent of outreach that has been conducted and if there are plans to further promote the results of the Project to achieve additional implementation. f. Describe the Project's ’s funding. Include the projected cost and actual cost of the Project, how much of the grant funds were spent, and how much funding was put into the Project from other sources. Identify funding sources that have been "“leveraged" ” by the Project and plans for funding future activities. g. Identify planned or potential follow-up activities, such as any additional steps necessary to achieve the water quality objectives, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) or local watershed plans. h. Include appropriate photos and graphics. i. A list of items submitted as outlined in the Table of Items for Review. j. Any additional information that is deemed appropriate by the Project Director or Grant Manager.

DRAFT PROJECT REPORT. Prepare and submit to the Grant Manager Manager, for review and comment, a draft Project Report for review and comment that includes information collected by the recipient in accordance with the Project monitoring and addresses reporting plan, a determination of the effectiveness of the Project in preventing or reducing pollution, and the results of the monitoring program. The draft report shall address the following narrative sections and items. Additional requirements are listed in Exhibit D.. a. A summary of the Project, describing Project purpose, scope and goals, activities completed, techniques used and partners involved. b. A report of all monitoring and management practices or management measures implemented, together with their corresponding locations. The report shall include all Project required water quality monitoring data as uploaded into CEDEN, and provided in both Microsoft Excel and pdf formats. The report shall also be in a format that enables the Grant Manager to find the physical location of each implemented practice or measure and/or monitoring event in a quick and efficient manner. Acceptable formats include, but are not limited to: • Map of locations -The – The map of practices or measures implemented shall consist of dots placed on a USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map at the implementation location. Lead lines shall be connected to a text box description of the practice or measure. The dots shall have a small enough diameter to enable the Grant Manager to locate the measure or practice within a 50-foot radius. • Project coding system -The – The project coding system shall explain the coding used to describe each implemented practice or measure and include a reference to the corresponding GPS location(s). c. Describe Project performance, including benefits, successes and shortcomings, consistent with the PAEP. Enumerate specific quantifiable environmental changes and results of the Project. As appropriate, include 1) behavioral results such as the amount of management practices or measures implemented, 2) estimates or measurements of the amount of pollutants prevented from reaching surface or ground water, 3) documented changes in water quality based on monitoring, and 4) improved or protected beneficial uses. d. Identify lessons learned in carrying out the Project. Describe what worked and what did not work, and how similar efforts could be utilized within the Project area, as well as in other watersheds. e. Describe the extent of outreach that has been conducted and if there are plans to further promote the results of the Project to achieve additional implementation. f. Describe the Project's ’s funding. Include the projected cost and actual cost of the Project, how much of the grant funds were spent, and how much funding was put into the Project from other sources. Identify funding sources that have been "“leveraged" ” by the Project and plans for funding future activities. g. Identify planned or potential follow-up activities, such as any additional steps necessary to achieve the water quality objectives, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) or local watershed plans. h. Include appropriate photos and graphics. i. A list of items submitted as outlined in the Table of Items for Review. j. Any additional information that is deemed appropriate by the Project Director or Grant Manager.