DROC Review and Approval Sample Clauses

DROC Review and Approval. (a) The DROC will make good faith efforts to take no more than seven (7) business days from the date of submission to complete its review of a Proposed Feasibility Query or Proposed Research Project, unless extended dialogue is warranted, in which case the DROC will notify the Data Requestor within seven (7) business days from the date of submission that additional time is needed to evaluate the Proposed Feasibility Query or Proposed Research Project and the time at which the evaluation will be completed. (b) In reviewing Proposed Feasibility Queries and Proposed Research Projects, the DROC will verify the identity of the Data Requestor and the authority of that individual to receive the Aggregate Response or system access from GPC. (c) The DROC, with the assistance of the Director, will audit at least quarterly the use of the Aggregate Response by Data Requestors for compliance with the Data Use Agreement. Procedures for such auditing will be determined by the GPC Governing Council.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DROC Review and Approval. Except as outlined in section 2.05(a) above, prior to receiving Information, Qualified Faculty shall be required to submit an information request, research proposal and Data Use Agreement in a format acceptable to the DROC. The initial Data Use Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The information requests, research proposals and associated Data Use Agreements shall be reviewed by the DROC. All requests shall be archived. The DROC will make good faith efforts to take no more than seven (7) business days from the date the request is submitted to review the request, unless extended dialogue is warranted, in which case the DROC shall notify the requesting party within seven (7) business days from the date the request is submitted that additional time is needed to evaluate the request and the time at which the evaluation will be completed. In reviewing Information requests, the DROC shall verify the identity of the person making the request and the authority of that individual to receive the Information from EGRET. Qualified Faculty must join in any information request, including a request by a research collaborator. The Information shall be provided to the requesting Qualified Faculty member only after verification of said Qualified Faculty’s right to access, approval of the Information request and research proposal, and execution of the Data Use Agreement by the Qualified Faculty member and collaborating researcher if any. The Data Use Agreement set forth at Exhibit B shall (i) require research publications arising from the use of Information to contain only aggregate data that does not specifically identify any patient whose Information is received pursuant to this Agreement unless a specific authorization is obtained from the patient; and (ii) other than use of an acknowledgement statement in oral and written presentations, disclosures and publications as required by the Data Use Agreement, prohibit the publication of data (including aggregate data on a Participant level basis) in a form that identifies the Participant that supplied the data, unless prior written permission of the Participant that supplied the data has been obtained. The Data Use Agreement shall also prohibit collaboration between Qualified Faculty and industry regarding access to or use of Information, unless prior written permission of the Participant that supplied the data has been obtained. In order to prevent inadvertent identification of patients, data for sample sizes less than...
Sample 1

Related to DROC Review and Approval

  • Review and Approval The Supplier confirms and agrees that it shall apply to receive ISR's written consent, wherever ISR's consent, explicitly or implied, is required according to this Agreement. This requirement and the provision of ISR consent, shall not derogate in any way from Supplier's responsibilities and liabilities under this Agreement, and ISR shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the review (whether or not there are objections) and/or with any approval given to, or denied from, Supplier, with respect to any matter and/or document, including but without limitation, drawings, designs (at all phases), plans, tests or otherwise.

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Effective Date, Term and Approval This Agreement shall become effective with respect to a Fund, if approved by the shareholders of such Fund, on the Effective Date for such Fund, as set forth in Appendix A attached hereto. If so approved, this Agreement shall thereafter continue in force and effect until June 30, 2021, and may be continued from year to year thereafter, provided that the continuation of the Agreement is specifically approved at least annually: (a) (i) by the Board of Trustees or (ii) by the vote of “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of such Fund (as defined in Section 2(a)(42) of the 0000 Xxx); and (b) by the affirmative vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as defined in the 0000 Xxx) of a party to this Agreement (other than as trustees of the Trust), by votes cast in person at a meeting specifically called for such purpose.

  • Authorization, Approval, etc No authorization, approval, or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any governmental authority, regulatory body or any other Person is required either (a) for the pledge by the Pledgor of any Collateral pursuant to this Pledge Agreement or for the execution, delivery, and performance of this Pledge Agreement by the Pledgor, or (b) for the exercise by the Collateral Agent of the voting or other rights provided for in this Pledge Agreement, or, except with respect to any Pledged Shares, as may be required in connection with a disposition of such Pledged Shares by laws affecting the offering and sale of securities generally, the remedies in respect of the Collateral pursuant to this Pledge Agreement.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Requisite Regulatory Approvals All Consents required to be obtained from or made with any Governmental Authority in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall have been obtained or made.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!