Common use of Evaluation Ratings Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Ratings. a. At the conclusion of the evaluation process the evaluator shall give a rating of Highly Effective/Innovating, Effective/Proficient, Developing/ Professional Support Needed, or Unsatisfactory/Does Not Meet Standard in Standard 5 (Assessment) and each of the two other Standards agreed upon during the Goal Setting Conference. The evaluator may also give ratings in the remaining three Standards, with supporting evidence. In addition, the evaluator will indicate potential direction/focus for subsequent evaluation (see Evaluation Form, Appendix). b. A teacher who receives an Unsatisfactory rating in any standard shall be re-evaluated annually until he/she achieves a Effective /Proficient rating or is separated from the District pursuant to Education Code and shall enter the Teachers Engaged in Active Mentoring (TEAM) support program. c. A teacher who receives a Developing rating in any two (2) out of the three standards agreed upon in the goal-setting process shall be re- evaluated for the next year and may be entered into the Teachers Engaged in Active Mentoring (TEAM) support program. A teacher who receives a Developing rating in any three (3) of the standards shall be re-evaluated for the next year and may be entered into the Teachers Engaged in Active Mentoring (TEAM) support program. d. Teachers referred to the TEAM support program will work with their evaluator and the TEAM Coach to develop and follow a support plan for improvement (TEAM Support Plan, Appendix).