Satisfactory Evaluation. If the overall rating is “satisfactory” no follow-up is necessary.
Satisfactory Evaluation. In departmentalized schools, Department Heads shall give faculty members at least four months' warning before issuing an unsatisfactory performance rating. The warning should specify what would be required to achieve a satisfactory rating. Failure to meet the standards enunciated shall be considered just cause for an unsatisfactory evaluation. In non- departmentalized schools, equivalent arrangements shall be established by Deans and faculty members. Discipline for just cause under Articles 13.7 or 27 shall not be subject to this requirement.
Satisfactory Evaluation. The Committee shall make a recommendation to employ the evaluatee as a tenured employee starting in the following academic year.
Satisfactory Evaluation. The first formal observation will occur before December 1st of the 24 scheduled evaluation year. If the formal observation is satisfactory, the final evaluation may be 25 based on that observation.
Satisfactory Evaluation. A unit member shall earn a satisfactory rating for the evaluation if the overall average score in Section 2 on the J-2 Formal Observation Summary Report is greater than or equal to 3.0.
Satisfactory Evaluation. Performance evaluation of members of the bargaining unit shall be in conformance with Article 30.5(B).
Satisfactory Evaluation. Annual contract employees who receive at least a satisfactory rating on their performance evaluations during each of their three probationary years of employment, shall be awarded a professional services contract (PSC) if they meet the requirements specified in Florida Statute 1012.33(3)(a) provided that a vacant position exists in the district for which they are certified.
Satisfactory Evaluation. In departmentalized schools, Department Heads shall give faculty members at least four months' warning before issuing an unsatisfactory performance rating for the purpose of annual salary increases. At the request of the member, the warning shall trigger a meeting among the member, department head and appropriate representative of the UConn-AAUP, if requested, to develop a plan to achieve a satisfactory rating. Failure to meet the standards enunciated shall be considered just cause for an unsatisfactory evaluation. The member shall have the right to appeal any unsatisfactory annual evaluation through the grievance procedure. In non- departmentalized schools, equivalent arrangements shall be established by Deans and faculty members. Discipline for just cause under Articles 13 or 27 shall not be subject to this requirement.
Satisfactory Evaluation. If the Assistant Superintendent receives an overall rating of “satisfactory” on his annual written evaluation, the Superintendent may recommend to the Board that Assistant Superintendent’s contract be extended by up to two years. Upon receiving such recommendation, the Board shall determine, in its sole discretion, whether an extension is appropriate, and, if so, the length thereof. However, in no event shall the term of Assistant Superintendent’s contract as extended exceed four years, in accordance with Education Code section 35031.
Satisfactory Evaluation. The Committee shall make a recommendation to:
