Common use of Evaluations of Employees Dealing with Private Service Providers Clause in Contracts

Evaluations of Employees Dealing with Private Service Providers. A State employee whose job duties require interaction with a private service provider may not be penalized solely due to poor performance by the private service provider unless the employee was responsible for ensuring that the performance of the private service provider was satisfactory. A State employee observing poor performance by a private service provider shall submit a written report to his/her observations to his/her immediate supervisor. The supervisor shall forward the information to the Appointing Authority. The employee shall be protected as provided under the Whistleblower law, SPP Title 5, Subtitle 3. If the poor performance continues the report shall be discussed at the departmental LMC. If the employee’s disclosure results in a direct savings to the State, the head of a principal unit may award the employee an Incentive Performance Award for extraordinary service in accordance with Section 10-204 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article. Under this provision, the head of a principal unit may award an employee or members of a group of employees in the unit:

Appears in 12 contracts

Samples: www.afscmemd.org, Mou for Bargaining Unit H Preamble, www.afscmemd.org

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Evaluations of Employees Dealing with Private Service Providers. A State employee whose job duties require interaction with a private service provider may not be penalized solely due to poor performance by the private service provider unless the employee was responsible for ensuring that the performance of the private service provider was satisfactory. A State employee observing poor performance by a private service provider shall submit a written report to his/her observations to his/her immediate supervisor. The supervisor shall forward the information to the Appointing Authority. The employee shall be protected as provided under the Whistleblower law, SPP Title 5, Subtitle 3. If the poor performance continues the report shall be discussed at the departmental LMC. If the employee’s 's disclosure results in a direct savings to the State, the head of a principal unit may award the employee an Incentive Performance Award for extraordinary service in accordance with Section 10-204 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article. Under this provision, the head of a principal unit may award an employee or members of a group of employees in the unit:

Appears in 9 contracts

Samples: afscmeatwork.org, www.afscmemd.org, afscmeatwork.org

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Evaluations of Employees Dealing with Private Service Providers. A State employee whose job duties require interaction with a private service provider may not be penalized solely due to poor performance by the private service provider unless the employee was responsible for ensuring that the performance of the private service provider was satisfactory. A State employee observing poor performance by a private service provider shall submit a written report to of his/her observations to his/her immediate supervisor. The supervisor shall forward the information to the Appointing Authority. The employee shall be protected as provided under the Whistleblower law, SPP Title 5, Subtitle 3. If the poor performance continues the report shall be discussed at the departmental LMC. If the employee’s 's disclosure results in a direct savings to the State, the head of a principal unit may award the employee an Incentive Performance Award for extraordinary service in accordance with Section 10-204 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article. Under this provision, the head of a principal unit may award an employee or members of a group of employees in the unit:

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Mou for Bargaining Unit H Preamble

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.