Evidence of Participation audit Sample Clauses

Evidence of Participation audit. The Department may conduct an Evidence of Participation audit, using a statistically valid sample size it determines. If the audit reveals unsupported subjects (exceptions) without satisfactory Evidence of Participation in accordance with this Contract (including Clause 9 of this Schedule 1) and the percentage of exceptions exceeds a threshold determined by the Department, it may take action under Clause 16 (Enforcement) of this Contract. For the purpose of Clause 12.3 of this Schedule 1, if the Department: applies a monetary amount under Clause 16.2(e), that amount will be 10 per cent of the total Funds claimed and/or paid to the Training Provider across the total population of subjects from which the statistically valid sample has been drawn, multiplied by the percentage of exceptions; and/or requires a refund of the Funds under Clause 16.2(d), the value of Funds sought may be up to the percentage of exceptions above the threshold, multiplied by the total Funds claimed and/or paid to the Training Provider across the total population of subjects from which the statistically valid sample has been drawn. Evidence of Eligibility audit If an Evidence of Eligibility audit reveals that the Training Provider does not have sufficient documentation to demonstrate it has correctly assessed an individual’s Skills First Entitlement (in accordance with Clause 3 of Schedule 1) and the Training Provider has claimed Funds for that individual (exception), then the Department may take action under Clause 16 (Enforcement) of this Contract. For the purpose of Clause 12.5 of this Schedule 1, if the Department applies a monetary amount under Clause 16.2(e), that amount will be 10 per cent of the total Funds claimed and/or paid to the Training Provider for each enrolment for which an exception has been identified. Evidence of Fee Concession/ Fee Waiver audit If an Evidence of Fee Concession/Fee Waiver audit reveals that the Training Provider does not have sufficient documentation to demonstrate that it has correctly assessed a Skills First Student’s entitlement to receive a Fee Concession or Fee Waiver (in accordance with this Contract, including Clause 5 of this Schedule 1), and the Training Provider has claimed Funds for that individual (exception) then the Department may take action under Clause 16 (Enforcement) of this Contract. For the purpose of Clause 12.7 of this Schedule 1, if the Department applies a monetary amount under Clause 16.2(e), that amount will be 10 per cen...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evidence of Participation audit

  • EVIDENCE OF PARTICIPATION All Training Services delivered by the Training Provider to an Eligible Individual must be supported by Evidence of Participation in accordance with the remainder of this Clause 11 for each unit of competency, such that a reasonable judgement regarding an Eligible Individual’s participation in Training Services can be made. The Training Provider must maintain documented evidence of engagement by the Eligible Individual in the learning and/or assessment activity. Except as permitted under Clause 11.5 of this Schedule 1, to be valid, evidence must contain the Eligible Individual's name or identification number, a unit of competency identifier and a date. The Department will determine if the evidence provided is sufficient to substantiate the claim that the Eligible Individual participated in training. In addition, the following minimum specifications must be met to evidence an Eligible Individual’s engagement in Training Services activity: one point of Evidence of Participation per unit of competency must be provided if the period between the Activity Start Date and Activity End Date (inclusive) for the unit of competency is one month or less; or two points of Evidence of Participation per unit of competency must be provided if the period between the Activity Start Date and Activity End Date for the unit of competency is greater than one month, including one point within the first month and one point within the last month of training delivery and/or assessment as identified by the reported Activity End Date. Two different forms of Evidence of Participation must be used. An auditor would consider the time elapsed between the start and end date (or withdrawal) of the unit of competency and use discretion as to a reasonable demonstration of ongoing engagement by an individual in learning and/or assessment activity across the unit of competency, where one point of Evidence of Participation is one item of evidence as specified in Clause 11.5 of this Schedule 1. In instances where competency based completions are involved, and where the employer signoff has not yet been received by the Training Provider, an auditor will consider the last point of Evidence of Participation relating to training and/or assessment. The only Evidence of Participation that is acceptable under this VET Funding Contract is: evidence of work submitted relating to engagement by the Eligible Individual in the unit of competency: At a minimum, this evidence must contain the Eligible Individual’s signature, and comply with the requirements set out in Clause 11.2 of this Schedule 1. In cases where this information cannot be recorded on the work itself, separate evidence must accompany the work to allow it to be linked to the Eligible Individual, the unit of competency and date completed, for example, identification of an Eligible Individual by a client identifier and a delivery schedule or equivalent detailing how the piece of work covers the unit of competency in question, including due dates and milestones; Skills First Teacher notes based on communication between the Skills First Teacher and Eligible Individual, establishing the Eligible Individual’s involvement in the learning and/or assessment activity of the unit of competency. This includes personal interviews, telephone, e-mail, or other communication modes on the engagement of an Eligible Individual in learning and/or assessment activity of the unit of competency and may include reference to notes from another person working alongside the Skills First Teacher, for example an industry expert or workplace supervisor;

  • Termination of Participation If the Administrator determines in good faith that the Executive no longer qualifies as a member of a select group of management or highly compensated employees, as determined in accordance with ERISA, the Administrator shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to cease further benefit accruals hereunder.

  • Refund for Withdrawal Due to Non-Delivery of Course The PEI will notify the Student within three (3) working days upon knowledge of any of the following:

  • Notification to Unsuccessful Job Applicants The parties agree that any unsuccessful candidate for an ONA job posting will be notified, in writing, within one (1) week of the decision being made and prior to the posting of the name of the successful candidate. The parties further agree that the above notification will be copied to the ONA Bargaining Unit President.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.