FSM Program Governance Sample Clauses

FSM Program Governance. The OCFO FSM JPMO is responsible for coordinating all efforts to support the FSM Program. JPMO functions include program management, information technology management, and business transformation. The JPMO works with the DHS Component agencies, DHS leadership, and external stakeholders from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the General Services Administration (GSA), and the Unified Shared Services Management (USSM) to manage and govern the Program in accordance with the DHS Acquisition Lifecycle Framework and Systems Engineering Lifecycle (SELC). Further, JPMO coordinates governance of financial management shared services in compliance with OMB Memorandum M-19-16 with the Department of Treasury (the designated Quality Service Management Office). The JPMO supports the implementation and governance of the Financial Systems Modernization (FSM) Program for meeting mission needs and closing capability gaps identified in the FSM Concept of Operations (CONOPS). To date, the JPMO has initiated the first phase of the FSM Program for three Components: U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), Transportation Safety Administration (TSA), and the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate (CWMD). The “current state” for the purposes of the EFSI BPA consists of existing legacy systems implemented independently for all DHS Components and directorates, and a developmental target solution for USCG, TSA and CWMD. The FSM JPMO uses a Portfolio-Program-Project model to ensure proper management of DHS financial system modernization efforts across the Department. Generally, the JPMO funds and manages the FSM portfolio, whereas the Components align Programs and Projects to the Portfolio. The JPMO operates under a charter to the FSM Executive Steering Committee (ESC), and utilizes standard DHS SELC documents to govern the conduct of all FSM activities. The FSM governance structure is shown below in Figure 1. Figure 1: Financial Systems Modernization Governance Structure
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to FSM Program Governance

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • Governance (a) The HSP represents, warrants and covenants that it has established, and will maintain for the period during which this Agreement is in effect, policies and procedures:

  • Corporate Governance Ultimus shall provide the following services to the Trust and its Funds:

  • Governance and Anticorruption 14. The Borrower, the Project Executing Agency, and the implementing agencies shall (a) comply with ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (1998, as amended to date) and acknowledge that ADB reserves the right to investigate directly, or through its agents, any alleged corrupt, fraudulent, collusive or coercive practice relating to the Project; and

  • GOVERNANCE AND REPORTING Measure 3a Is the school complying with governance requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to governance by its board, including but not limited to: • Governing board composition and membership requirements pursuant to Ch. 302D, HRS • Governing board policies • Governing board reporting requirements • Procurement policies • State Ethics Code (Ch. 84, HRS), including conflict of interest policy Measure 3b Is the school holding management accountable? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to oversight of school management, including but not limited to: • (For Education Service Providers [ESPs]) maintaining authority over management, holding it accountable for performance as agreed under a written performance agreement and requiring annual financial reports of the ESP • (For Others) oversight of management that includes holding it accountable for performance expectations that may or may not be agreed to under a written performance agreement Measure 3c Is the school complying with data and reporting requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to relevant reporting requirements to the State Public Charter School Commission, State Department of Education as the State Education Agency (SEA) and sole Local Education Agency (LEA) and/or federal authorities, including but not limited to: • Compliance with minimum educational data reporting standards established by the BOE • Maintaining and reporting accurate enrollment and attendance data • Maintaining and reporting accurate personnel data • Annual reporting and immediate notice requirements • Additional information requested by the State Public Charter School Commission

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.

  • Ethics No officer, agent or employee of the Board is or shall be employed by Provider or has or shall have a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in this Agreement or the compensation to be paid hereunder except as may be permitted in writing by the Board’s Code of Ethics, adopted May 25, 2011 (11-0525-PO2), as amended from time to time, which policy is hereby incorporated by reference into and made part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.

  • Compliance Program The Company has established and administers a compliance program applicable to the Company, to assist the Company and the directors, officers and employees of the Company in complying with applicable regulatory guidelines (including, without limitation, those administered by the FDA, the EMA, and any other foreign, federal, state or local governmental or regulatory authority performing functions similar to those performed by the FDA or EMA); except where such noncompliance would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!