General Final Evaluation Questions Sample Clauses

General Final Evaluation Questions. Household roaster Questionnaires must start with a household roaster to identify all eligible respondents. (See annex 3; a model of a HH roster) MYAP Design, Implementation and Achievement:  Are planned activities appropriate for the food security problems identified in the selected target areas? Do the framework, assumptions and design match the local food security conditions?  Are the selection criteria appropriate for identifying and reaching target communities and households?  Is the program well integrated in the local government’s strategy and priorities? Are there steps that could be taken to improve the integration as well as food security impacts through greater integration for future programming?  How effective is the program at reaching women? What could have been done to improve women’s participation?  Which interventions are most critical and/or effective in achieving project objectives? What interventions have been more or less successful in meeting the program goal? Why?  Are there any unexpected but important benefits or impacts of the program that should be documented? Are there any negative impacts or unintended consequences of the program that need to be addressed, and how?  To what extent have the major challenges faced by the Consortium members affected MYAP performance? How are these challenges addressed?  Do food-for-work activities compete with or complement the demands for household labor on other productive activities? Adoption of technologies/practices:  Are beneficiaries adopting desired practices or sustainable agricultural technologies? What new technologies have Consortium Members introduced under the MYAP that are enhancing program objectives?  What is beneficiaries’ primary source of information concerning practices and behaviors? What are other key channels of information? Capacity Strengthening:  Has the program effectively developed the capacity of stakeholders and/or partners? If not, how could the design or implementation be altered to improve capacity strengthening for future programming?  Has the program effectively enabled, or developed the capacity of, beneficiaries? If not, how could the design or implementation be altered to improve capacity strengthening? Sustainability:  Are the outcomes/impact related to adoption of better practices sustainable? (i.e., participants are likely to continue after the project ends?) Which outcomes/impacts are likely or unlikely to be sustainable, and why? What can be ...