General Observations. All groups Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? Assessors What training have assessors received? Was it sufficient? Structure of Assessment Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments? GUIDELINES: ANNEX 3 Guidelines for Review Reporting INTERNATIONAL COMPETENCY REVIEW REPORT <insert name of competency agreement> Authorized Member under review: Contact details: Review Visit Dates: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) VISIT SCHEDULE: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) COMPOSITION OF REVIEW TEAM: Name: Authorized Member Affiliation Team Leader: Team Member: Team Member:
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Professional Engineers Agreement Apec Engineer Agreement, Professional Engineers Agreement
General Observations. • All groups • Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? • Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? • Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? Assessors • What training have assessors received? • Was it sufficient? Structure of Assessment • Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? • Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments? GUIDELINES: ANNEX 3 3 Guidelines for Review Reporting INTERNATIONAL COMPETENCY REVIEW REPORT <insert name of competency agreement> Authorized Member under review: Contact details: Review Visit Dates: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) VISIT SCHEDULE: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) COMPOSITION OF REVIEW TEAM: Name: Authorized Member Affiliation Team Leader: Team Member: Team Member:
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.ieagreements.org
General Observations. All groups • Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? • Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? • Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? Assessors • What training have assessors received? • Was it sufficient? Structure of Assessment • Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? • Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments? GUIDELINES: ANNEX 3 Guidelines for Review Reporting GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW REPORTING INTERNATIONAL COMPETENCY REVIEW REPORT <insert name of competency agreement> Authorized Member under reviewAUTHORIZED MEMBER UNDER REVIEW: Contact details: Review Visit Dates: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) VISIT SCHEDULE: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) COMPOSITION OF REVIEW TEAM: Name: Authorized Member Affiliation Team Leader: Team Member: Team Member:
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Competence Agreement
General Observations. All groups • Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? • Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? • Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? Assessors • What training have assessors received? • Was it sufficient? Structure of Assessment • Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? • Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments? GUIDELINES: ANNEX 3 Guidelines for Review Reporting INTERNATIONAL COMPETENCY REVIEW REPORT <insert name of competency agreement> Authorized Member under review: Contact details: Review Visit Dates: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) VISIT SCHEDULE: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) COMPOSITION OF REVIEW TEAM: Name: Authorized Member Affiliation Team Leader: Team Member: Team Member:
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Professional Engineers Agreement Apec Engineer Agreement