Geographical Locations. The SLA covers the provision of Dedicated E-Line in the following categories: ● U.S. Region: U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, and Alaska. ● Global Tier A: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom. ● Global Tier B: Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Columbia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Guam, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx.
Geographical Locations. 1. The Supplier shall provide the Services (as set out in Part B above) in the following Geographical Locations (also referred to as ECA – Evolution Contract Areas).
Geographical Locations. The Supplier shall provide the Services (as selected in Part B above) in the following Geographical Locations. [Note – relevant areas for Call-Off Contract to be added.] SCHEDULE 2.2 CALL-OFF PERFORMANCE LEVELS CALL-OFF CONTRACT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The Call-Off Contract Performance Indicators for this Call-Off Contract shall be those set out in Appendix 1 to this Schedule 2.2 (Call-Off Performance Levels).
Geographical Locations. The survey results clearly show that the majority of the respondents is interested in content from all over the world and that most of them would like to be able to search for content at a local, national, transnational and European level. Users from the Education & Research field are those more interested in exploring a range of content with a global geographical coverage. Virtual exhibitions: As users declared they would like to be further guided in their search in order to find the most significant content by getting access to content that is clustered in commons themes. To this end, ECLAP will develop virtual exhibitions with exemplary and high-quality content, which function as transnational monographs that highlight the similarities and differences between performing arts from various European countries. Providers: Participants of the usability tests indicated that the presence of the respective content partners should be clearly communicated, as this would ensure the quality and trustworthiness of the collections at a first sight. Moreover, users perceive the ECLAP website as reliable and the content providers as trustworthy institutions. In order to highlight these aspects - that might attract other users - and at the same time to allow users to be able to browse by institution getting an idea of what kind of items each country holds, a corresponding facet has been designed. Rights: From the general observation of the usability test it is clear that users need to easily see the IPR status of the items in order to choose content based on its access and re-use possibilities. A specific facet will provide them with this option. The specification of the terms in these facets can be found on the ECLAP portal. 7Conclusions and future work A lot of the existing use cases and requirements have been implemented in the first year of the project. Still, it is clear from the results of the surveys, usability tests, expert interviews and desk research that users are also intersted in more specific requirements. The main outcomes are that users want contextualised and clustered content, which can be realised by offering virtual exhitibions and by improving the current faceted search. Especially for educational users, being able to use plugins, tools and data from external sources in ECLAP is a desired feature, such as exporting content in ECLAP als a bibliographic reference via tools as Zotero. Conversly developers and educational users would like to be able to ...
