Co-Location Sample Clauses

Co-Location. If Charter School is co-locating or sharing the District facilities with another user, the District shall provide the operations and maintenance services for the District facilities and Charter School shall pay the Pro Rata Share. The parties may agree to an alternative arrangement regarding performance of the operations and maintenance services and payment for such in the use agreement.
Co-Location. Franchisee must offer the City the opportunity to co-locate City conduit and lines in trenches dug by Franchisee in City rights-of-way and may charge City only any incremental additional costs incurred in making the trenches available for City use.
Co-Location. 1. Each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory provide to suppliers of public telecommunications services of the other Party physical co-location of equipment necessary for interconnection or access to unbundled network elements on a timely basis and on terms, conditions and at cost-oriented rates that are reasonable and non-discriminatory. 2. Where physical co-location is not practical for technical reasons or because of space limitations, each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory provide alternative solution, which may include facilitating virtual co-location, on a timely basis and on terms, conditions and at cost-oriented rates that are reasonable and non-discriminatory. 3. Each Party may determine, in accordance with its law and regulations, which premises in its territory are subject to paragraphs 1 and 2.
Co-Location. 1. Subject to Article 3 (Transitional Arrangements), each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory: (a) provide to suppliers of public telecommunications transport networks or services of other Parties that are facilities-based suppliers in the territory of that Party, physical co-location of equipment necessary for interconnection; and (b) in situations where physical co-location referred to in Subparagraph (a) is not practical for technical reasons or because of space limitations, co-operate with suppliers of public telecommunications transport networks — or services of other Parties that are facilities-based suppliers in the territory of that Party, to find and implement a practical and commercially viable alternative solution.
Co-Location. 1. Subject to paragraph 2, each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its Area allow suppliers of public telecommunications transport networks or services of the other Party to physically locate on the major suppliers’ premises the equipment which is essential for interconnection or access to unbundled network components or facilities, where physically feasible and where no practical or viable alternatives exist, on terms and conditions, and at cost-oriented rates, that are reasonable, non-discriminatory (including with respect to timeliness) and transparent. 2. Paragraph 1 applies to the major suppliers’ premises determined by each Party in accordance with its laws and regulations and applies with respect to linking with the essential facilities of the major suppliers.
Co-Location. (a) Each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory provide to facilities-based suppliers of the other Party physical co-location of equipment necessary for interconnection or access to unbundled network elements in a timely fashion and on terms, conditions, and cost-oriented rates that are reasonable, transparent, and non-discriminatory. (b) Where physical co-location under Article 9.4(a) is not practical for technical reasons or because of space limitations, each Party shall ensure that major suppliers co-operate with facilities-based suppliers to find and implement the most feasible alternative solution in a timely fashion and on terms, conditions, and cost-oriented rates that are reasonable, transparent, and non-discriminatory. Such solutions may include: (i) permitting facilities-based suppliers to locate equipment in a nearby building and to connect such equipment to the major supplier’s network; (ii) conditioning additional equipment space; (iii) optimizing the use of existing space; or (iv) finding adjacent space. (c) Each Party may determine in accordance with its domestic laws and regulations the locations at which it requires major suppliers in its territory to provide co-location under Article 9.4(a) on the basis of the state of competition in the relevant market.
Co-Location. 12.1 Subject to Clause 12.7 and availability of space, PMCL shall make available Co-Location to the Operator. Such Co-Location shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Schedule B3 and Annex C. 12.2 The Operator shall make payment to PMCL for use of the Co-Location Site(s), the Capacity acquired (on per E1 basis) and/or any other facilities of PMCL so acquired for the purpose of Interconnection in accordance with terms of Annex D. 12.3 Neither Party shall connect or knowingly permit the connection to its Network of any Interconnect Equipment, unless the Authority has approved such equipment. 12.4 Where PMCL does not have sufficient space to accommodate the Operator’s Co-location Request at the requested Co-Location Site, PMCL shall, where possible, suggest an alternative Co-Location Site. 12.5 If an alternative Co-Location Site is either not available or not suitable for the Operator, for operational reasons, the Operator shall make suitable agreement with a Third Party for space for placement of Operator’s Interconnect Equipment at locations of such Third Party where PMCL has infrastructure for the purposes of Interconnection (“Third Party Interconnection Site(s)”). The Operator shall obtain all the necessary approvals for such Co-Location and shall make payment of charges and bear the cost of installation for Co- location at such Third Party Co-Location Sites. 12.6 Each Party shall take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of the other Party’s equipment at its premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is the responsibility of each Party to provide adequate insurance cover for its respective equipment. In no case shall either Party be responsible for any damage to the other Party’s Co-Location Equipment caused by fire, water leakage, air-conditioning/mechanical ventilation failure, power fluctuation/interruption, or anything beyond that Party’s control (Force Majeure) at the Co- Location Site other than to the extent that it is the result of a grossly negligent, willful or reckless breach of this Agreement. 12.7 PMCL shall give regard to the following when assessing the availability of Co-location Space at a Co-Location Site: (a) PMCL’s reasonably anticipated requirements in the next four (4) years for space at the Co- Location Site for the provision to itself and its Customers; (b) PMCL’s reasonably anticipated requirements in the next four (4) years for space at the Co- Location Site for operation and maintenance purposes;...
Co-Location. 1. Each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory provide to suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services of the other Party physical co-location of equipment necessary for interconnection or access to unbundled network elements in a timely fashion, on terms and conditions, and at cost-oriented rates, that are reasonable, non-discriminatory, and transparent. 2. Where physical co-location under paragraph 1 is not practical for technical reasons or because of space limitations, each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory cooperate with suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services to find and implement a practical and commercially viable alternative solution in a timely fashion, on terms and conditions, and cost-oriented rates, that are reasonable, non-discriminatory and transparent. Such solutions may include, but are not limited to: (a) permitting facilities-based suppliers to locate equipment in a nearby building and to connect such equipment to the major supplier's network; (b) conditioning additional equipment space or virtual co-location in a timely fashion, on terms and conditions, and at cost oriented rates, that are reasonable, non-discriminatory and transparent; (c) optimising the use of existing space; or (d) finding adjacent space. 3. Each Party may determine, in accordance with its laws and regulations, the locations at which it requires major suppliers in its territory to provide the physical co- location or the practical and commercially viable alternative solutions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Co-Location. 1. Each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory provide to suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services of the other Party physical co- location of equipment necessary for interconnection or access to unbundled network elements in a timely fashion, on terms and conditions, and at cost-oriented rates, that are reasonable, non-discriminatory, and transparent. 2. Where physical co-location under paragraph 1 is not practical for technical reasons or because of space limitations, each Party shall ensure that major suppliers in its territory cooperate with suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services to find and implement a practical and commercially viable alternative solution in a timely fashion, on terms and conditions, and cost-oriented rates, that are reasonable, non-discriminatory and transparent. Such solutions may include, but are not limited to: (a) permitting facilities-based suppliers to locate equipment in a nearby building and to connect such equipment to the major supplier‟s network;