Governance of justice and human rights Sample Clauses

Governance of justice and human rights. According to recent judicial proceedings occurring in Dutch courts about the role of the UN peacekeeping force in Srebrenica, whose mandate was to pre- vent mass atrocities, the immunity of the United Nations seems to prevail.43 In determining whether the immunity of the United Nations was in con- flict with other rights under international law, the Dutch District Court addressed the standards set out in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights and the Geno- cide Convention. The domestic court in The Netherlands concluded that its inquiry into the possible conflict between the absolute immunity of the UN and other standards of international law did not lead to an exception to the immunity, and determined that it was therefore not competent to hear the case, which could ultimately end up before the European Court of Human Rights. The exclusion of the UN to appear in national courts restricts the 43 Court of Appeal The Hague, Case Number District Court: 07-2973, Mothers of Srebrenica et al. v. State of the Netherlands and United Nations, Judgement of 30 March 2010. Supreme Court of The Netherlands, Final appeal judgment, LJN: BW1999; ILDC 1760 (NL 2012), 12 April 2012. For the analysis of the judgement see, X. xxx Xxxxxxx, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts, ILDC 1760 (NL 2012), 1 May 2012. right of access to domestic courts. It is clear that the responsibility of the UN needs to be refined, before any changes are likely to occur in national courts on the UN immunity. In fact, as the Dutch Court of Appeals stated correctly, the UN is the international organization with the most far-reaching powers, but with the recent rulings national courts would have no jurisdic- tion even to hear civilian cases brought against the UN. According to the claim of the representative of the Dutch Foundation Mothers of Srebrenica, “human rights should prevail as it is the ultimate objective of human rights to provide protection against the strong powers of public authorities. If the UN is the only organization in the world that stands above the law, human rights lose their fundamental function. How credible is the UN as the fore- most human rights organization if the organization itself severely disregards these fundamental rights?”44 In this study such sensitive issue arises with regard to the UN peace operations and the role of justice, emphasizing the necessity to redefine the accountability of peac...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Governance of justice and human rights

  • Data Protection All personal data contained in the agreement shall be processed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the EU institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data. Such data shall be processed solely in connection with the implementation and follow-up of the agreement by the sending institution, the National Agency and the European Commission, without prejudice to the possibility of passing the data to the bodies responsible for inspection and audit in accordance with EU legislation (Court of Auditors or European Antifraud Office (XXXX)). The participant may, on written request, gain access to his personal data and correct any information that is inaccurate or incomplete. He/she should address any questions regarding the processing of his/her personal data to the sending institution and/or the National Agency. The participant may lodge a complaint against the processing of his personal data with the [national supervising body for data protection] with regard to the use of these data by the sending institution, the National Agency, or to the European Data Protection Supervisor with regard to the use of the data by the European Commission.

  • Arbitration Disputes arising under or in connection with this Agreement that are not resolved pursuant to Section 5.1, including requests for specific performance, will be resolved through binding arbitration conducted pursuant to the rules of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce. The arbitration will be conducted in the English language and will occur in Los Angeles County, California. Any arbitration will be in front of a single arbitrator, unless (i) ICANN is seeking punitive or exemplary damages, or operational sanctions, (ii) the parties agree in writing to a greater number of arbitrators, or (iii) the dispute arises under Section 7.6 or 7.7. In the case of clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) in the preceding sentence, the arbitration will be in front of three arbitrators with each party selecting one arbitrator and the two selected arbitrators selecting the third arbitrator. In order to expedite the arbitration and limit its cost, the arbitrator(s) shall establish page limits for the parties’ filings in conjunction with the arbitration, and should the arbitrator(s) determine that a hearing is necessary, the hearing shall be limited to one (1) calendar day, provided that in any arbitration in which ICANN is seeking punitive or exemplary damages, or operational sanctions, the hearing may be extended for one (1) additional calendar day if agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the arbitrator(s) based on the arbitrator(s) independent determination or the reasonable request of one of the parties thereto. The prevailing party in the arbitration will have the right to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, which the arbitrator(s) shall include in the awards. In the event the arbitrators determine that Registry Operator has been repeatedly and willfully in fundamental and material breach of its obligations set forth in Article 2, Article 6 or Section 5.4 of this Agreement, ICANN may request the arbitrators award punitive or exemplary damages, or operational sanctions (including without limitation an order temporarily restricting Registry Operator’s right to sell new registrations). Each party shall treat information received from the other party pursuant to the arbitration that is appropriately marked as confidential (as required by Section 7.15) as Confidential Information of such other party in accordance with Section 7.15. In any litigation involving ICANN concerning this Agreement, jurisdiction and exclusive venue for such litigation will be in a court located in Los Angeles County, California; however, the parties will also have the right to enforce a judgment of such a court in any court of competent jurisdiction.

  • Governing Law and Venue This Contract has been negotiated and executed in the state of California and shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the state of California. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Contract, the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California, and the parties hereto agree to and do hereby submit to the jurisdiction of such court, notwithstanding Code of Civil Procedure Section 394. Furthermore, the parties specifically agree to waive any and all rights to request that an action be transferred for adjudication to another county.

  • Dispute Resolution All or any disputes arising out or touching upon or in relation to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the interpretation and validity of the terms thereof and the respective rights and obligations of the Parties, shall be settled amicably by mutual discussion, failing which the same shall be settled through the adjudicating officer appointed under the Act.

  • Interpretation In this Agreement:

  • Disputes In the case of a dispute as to the determination of the Exercise Price or the arithmetic calculation of the number of Warrant Shares issuable in connection with any exercise, the Company shall promptly deliver to the Holder the number of Warrant Shares that are not disputed.

  • Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

  • Authority Each party represents that it is authorized to bind to the terms of this DPA, including confidentiality and destruction of Student Data and any portion thereof contained therein, all related or associated institutions, individuals, employees or contractors who may have access to the Student Data and/or any portion thereof.

  • Governing Law and Jurisdiction 39.1 This Agreement and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales.

  • Personal Leave Written request for a personal leave of absence without pay will be considered on an individual basis by the Hospital. Such requests are to be submitted to the employee's immediate supervisor at least four (4) weeks in advance, unless not reasonably possible to give such notice, and a written reply will be given within fourteen (14) days except in cases of emergency in which case a reply will be given as soon as possible. Employees needing personal leave days for appointments with medical practitioners may utilize the personal leave language. Such leave shall not be unreasonably withheld.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.