We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Supreme Court Sample Clauses

Supreme Court. The Supreme Court shall adjudicate all matters arising out of the elections during the transition, in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the country.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may exercise jurisdiction in relation to the commission and the commissioners in the same way and to the same extent as it could if the commission were a body representing the Territory and the commissioners were Territory officers.
Sample 1
Supreme Court. Records and Briefs-California (State). Number of Exhibits: 1 Leases & Rental Agreements-Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx 2017-08-30 Anyone who owns or manages residential real estate, anywhere in the U.S., should buy this book, as it provides a solid lease, that can be tailored to the laws of a specific state, and the key rental documents needed to start a tenancy.
Sample 1
Supreme Court. In Nebraska Department of Revenue v. Lxxxxxxxxxx, 005 X. Xx. 000 (0094), the Supreme Court held that a mutual fund which entered into a repurchase transaction was not to be viewed as owning the underlying federal securities but as having made a loan to the holder of such securities for purposes of state taxation of the interest income. The Supreme Court did not dispute the contention of the mutual fund that repos are treated as purchases and sales for purposes of federal securities law, bankruptcy law, banking law as well as commercial and local government law or any other body of law but limited its holding to characterizing the interest as taxable or tax-exempt for Nebraska state law purposes. Furthermore, nothing in the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution or other applicable law directed the Court to consider the provisions of the 1940 Act. Accordingly, the Court's holding in Nebraska Department of Revenue is not applicable to the determination whether the Repos should be viewed as Government securities for purposes of the 75 percent asset test.
Sample 1
Supreme Court. The SC held that the arbitration clause is contained in the standard terms and conditions contained in the attachment to the contract.
Sample 1
Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court has embraced the principle of the pre- disciplinary interview as required due process when an employee may be disciplined. In Case No. 470 U.S. 532, Justice Whitx, xxeaking for the majority, stated: THE ARBITRATORS
Sample 1
Supreme Court. 4. Uiteindelijk moest het Supreme Court6 van het Vere- nigd Koninkrijk zich over de zaak buigen. Wegens het belang van de zaak voor de internationale arbitragewereld kwamen de bekende arbitrage-instellingen LCIA (London 5. Het Supreme Court erkende dat er een contractuele relatie bestaat tussen arbiters en partijen, via dewelke arbi- ters hun diensten verlenen. Op de vraag of er in deze relatie sprake is van ‘employment’ in de zin van de antidiscrimina- tiewetgeving in arbeidszaken, antwoordde het Supreme Court negatief, omdat de rol van de arbiter van nature uit niet zo wordt omschreven. 6. Bij wijze van intellectuele uitstap ging het Supreme Court nog na of, indien de bewuste antidiscriminatiewetge- ving toch van toepassing zou zijn, de vereiste religieuze kwalificaties van de arbiters geoorloofd zouden zijn. Het Supreme Court oordeelde dat dit het geval was en steunde zich daarbij op één van de basisbeginselen van arbitrage, met name de ruime keuzevrijheid die aan partijen wordt gegeven om de arbitrageprocedure in te richten. In een concurring opinion betwijfelt Lord Xxxxx xxxxxxx dat het opleggen van religieuze vereisten aan arbiters gerechtvaardigd of propor- tioneel is.
Sample 1
Supreme Court 
Sample 1

Related to Supreme Court

  • Courts If a Dispute is still unresolved following ten (10) Business Days after the Disputing Members attempted in good faith to resolve the Dispute in accordance with Section 11.02, then any of such Disputing Members may submit such Dispute to the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, in the event that such Court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of such dispute, to another court of the State of Delaware or a U.S. federal court located in the State of Delaware (collectively, “Delaware Courts”). Each of the Members irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of, and agrees not to commence any action, suit, or proceeding relating to a Dispute except in, the Delaware Courts and hereby consents to service of process in any such Dispute by the delivery of such process to such party at the address and in the manner provided in Section 13.01. Each of the Members hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives any objection to the laying of venue in any Dispute in the Delaware Courts and hereby further irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any action, suit, or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum. EACH MEMBER IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any right it may have to a TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, suit, OR PROCEEDING arising out of, relating to or otherwise WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT or any transaction contemplated hereby.

  • Jurisdiction of Courts Québec hereby appoints the person from time to time who holds the position of Delegate General of Québec in New York, Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 00xx xxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000-0000, as its authorized agent (the “Authorized Agent”) upon whom process may be served in any action by any Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement which may be instituted in any State or Federal court in The City of New York, and expressly accepts the non-exclusive jurisdiction of any such court in respect of such action. Québec hereby irrevocably waives any immunity to service of process in respect of any such action to which the Authorized Agent might otherwise be entitled. Such appointment shall be irrevocable as long as any of the Securities remain outstanding, except that, if for any reason the Authorized Agent ceases to be able to act as agent or no longer has an address in The City of New York, Québec will appoint another person or persons in The City of New York, selected in its discretion, as Authorized Agent(s). Québec will take any and all action, including the filing of any and all documents and instruments that may be necessary to continue such appointment or appointments in full force and effect as aforesaid. Service of process upon the Authorized Agent together with written notice of such service mailed or delivered to Québec at its address set forth in Section 11, shall be deemed in every respect effective service of process upon Québec. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action by an Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement may be instituted in any competent court in Québec. Québec hereby waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any immunity to jurisdiction to which it might otherwise be entitled in any action based on this Agreement which may be instituted as provided in this Section in any State or Federal court in The City of New York or in any competent court in Québec.

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA]. The competent court determined in accordance with the applicable national law shall have sole jurisdiction to hear any dispute between the institution and the participant concerning the interpretation, application or validity of this Agreement, if such dispute cannot be settled amicably.

  • Jurisdiction; Venue In the event that any action is brought to enforce any provision of this Contract, the parties agree to exclusive jurisdiction in Thurston County Superior Court for the State of Washington and agree that in any such action venue shall lie exclusively at Olympia, Washington.

  • Court ordered services and supplies including court-ordered care or testing, or services required as a condition of parole, probation, release or because of any legal proceeding.

  • Application to Court If (i) a claim for indemnification or advancement of Expenses is denied, in whole or in part, (ii) no disposition of such claim is made by the Company within ninety (90) days after the request therefore, (iii) the advancement of Expenses is not timely made pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement or (iv) payment of indemnification is not made pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement, the Indemnitee shall have the right to apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery, the court in which the Proceeding is or was pending, or any other court of competent jurisdiction, for the purpose of enforcing the Indemnitee’s right to indemnification (including the advancement of Expenses) pursuant to this Agreement.

  • District The public agency or the school district for which the Work is performed. The governing board of the District or its designees will act for the District in all matters pertaining to the Contract. The District may, at any time: 1.1.23.1 Direct Developer to communicate with or provide notice to the Construction Manager or the Architect on matters for which the Contract Documents indicate Developer will communicate with or provide notice to the District; and/or 1.1.23.2 Direct the Construction Manager or the Architect to communicate with or direct Developer on matters for which the Contract Documents indicate the District will communicate with or direct Developer.

  • Jurisdiction of English courts The courts of England have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (including a dispute relating to the existence, validity or termination of this Agreement) or any non-contractual obligation arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (a Dispute).

  • Arbitrator's Jurisdiction The arbitrator shall take such evidence as in his judgment is appropriate for resolution of the dispute; however, he shall confine himself to the issues for arbitration and shall have no authority to determine any other issue not so submitted which is not directly essential to reaching a determination on the dispute at hand. The arbitrator shall have no power to recommend any right or relief for any period of time prior to the effective date of the Agreement under which the grievance was initiated. In those issues wherein the grievant’s relief sought involves back pay or lost wages covering a period of an Employee’s payroll separation due to suspension or discharge, the amount of the award shall be less any unemployment compensation or interim earnings, received by the aggrieved Employee. Second jobs or sources of income which the Employee received while under employment will not be considered interim income and will not be deducted when awarding lost wages or back pay. The decision of the arbitrator shall be submitted in writing to the parties within thirty (30) calendar days of the hearing’s conclusion unless the deadline is mutually extended by the parties. The decision and award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the Union, its members, the aggrieved Employee(s) and the CITY. With respect to grievances involving misapplication or misinterpretation of this Agreement, the grievance and arbitration procedure contained in this Article shall be the sole and exclusive remedy available to employees, and the parties hereto as this procedure is intended to supersede all conflicting provisions of the Ohio Revised Code regarding any and all matters subject to the grievance procedures of this Contract or otherwise made subject to this Agreement. With respect to grievances involving disciplinary suspensions, demotions or dismissals the election of remedies, as set forth above, shall be mutually exclusive. Choice of binding arbitration shall thereafter preclude appeal to Civil Service or to Court. Appeal to Civil Service shall preclude access to binding arbitration. With respect to cases of suspension, demotion and discharge, the arbitrator shall decide:

  • Court of Jurisdiction Both DBS and the Member agree that the Tokyo District Court will be the exclusive court of jurisdiction in the first instance in any dispute and/ or legal action relating to the rights and obligations under this Agreement or an Individual Contract.

Most Referenced Clauses

Most Referenced Definitions