Guiding Principles For Resolving Conflicting Priorities in Custody Decisions Sample Clauses

Guiding Principles For Resolving Conflicting Priorities in Custody Decisions. (Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxx’s presentation – May 2011 – Guelph)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Guiding Principles For Resolving Conflicting Priorities in Custody Decisions. (Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxx’s presentation – May 2011 – Guelph)  Priority 1 Protect children  Priority 2 Protect the safety & support the well-being of the victim parent  Priority 3 Respect the right of adult victims to direct their own lives  Priority 4 Hold perpetrators of domestic violence accountable for their abusive behaviorPriority 5 Allow child access to both parents Father are given access (Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx’s presentation 2010) • Father access restricted: – 71.2% in DV cases – 17.5% no DV • Xxxxxx assigned supervised visitation in: – 25.6% of substantiated domestic violence • 4.6% no evidence or allegation of domestic violence(Kernic, et al; 2005) Evaluations of parenting (Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx’s presentation 2010) • Judges, custody evaluators and others: – underestimate the danger of men to their children – undervalue the safety strategies used by mothers How do Men Who Batter Parent? (Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx’s presentation 2010) Research shows: – Behavior negatively affects children – Continue threats and violence after separation – Limited evidence they are more controlling and abusive as parents – Perpetrators often involve children in violent events(see Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxx, 2002, for summary) Court Decision Options (Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx’s presentation 2010) • Contact choices – No contact – Supervised visitation (professional vs. kinship) – Supervised exchange (professional vs. kinship) – Exchanges in public places – Unsupervised visitation – Liberal and regular visitation – Shared custody/parenting • Not automatic! Behavior based, not time based. • Not rushed to least restrictive • Regular judicial reviews in any option (Xxxxx & Xxxxxx, 2007)

Related to Guiding Principles For Resolving Conflicting Priorities in Custody Decisions

  • Issue Resolution Procedures As soon as possible after any occupational health and safety issue has been reported, the company’s or management representative and elected safety representative must meet to try to resolve the issue. The resolution of the issue must take into account those of the following factors that are relevant: o Whether the hazard or risk can be isolated o The number and location of employees affected o Whether appropriate temporary measures are possible or desirable o Whether environmental monitoring is desirable o The time that may elapse before the hazard or risk is permanently corrected o Who is responsible for performing work and overseeing the removal of the hazard or risk. As soon as possible after the resolution of an issue, details of the agreement must be brought to the attention of affected employees in an appropriate manner. Should the matter not be resolved, the issue shall be dealt with in line with Clause 20 of the VBIA “Safety Disputes Resolution Procedure”.

  • Hearing Procedures The hearing shall be conducted to preserve its privacy and to allow reasonable procedural due process. Rules of evidence need not be strictly followed, and the hearing shall be streamlined as follows:

  • Procedures of the Joint Committee 1. For the proper implementation of this Agreement, the Joint Committee shall meet at an appropriate level whenever necessary upon request but at least once a year. Either Party may request a meeting be held.

  • DISPUTES RESOLUTION PROCEDURE 10.1 A major objective of this Agreement is to eliminate lost time and/or production arising out of disputes or grievances. The Parties to this Agreement are committed to complying with the terms of this procedure.

  • Dispute Resolution Procedures (a) In the event a dispute arises about the interpretation, application, calculation of Loss, or calculation of payments or otherwise with respect to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item”), then the Receiver and the Assuming Institution shall make every attempt in good faith to resolve such items within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a written description of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item, with notification of the possibility of taking the matter to arbitration (the date on which such 60-day period expires, or any extension of such period as the parties hereto may mutually agree to in writing, herein called the “Resolution Deadline Date”). If the Receiver and the Assuming Institution resolve all such items to their mutual satisfaction by the Resolution Deadline Date, then within thirty (30) days following such resolution, any payment due as a result of such resolution shall be made arising from the settlement of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute.

  • Impasse Procedures The Parties shall seek to reach agreement relative to the appointment of a mediator not later than the sixtieth (60) day preceding the budget submission date. The Parties shall seek to reach agreement relative to the appointment of a fact finder not later than the forty-fifth (45) day preceding the budget submission date. The Parties shall consider but not be limited to the service of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and the American Arbitration Association for a mediator and fact finder respectively. If the Parties fail to reach an agreement on the choice of a mediator or fact finder, the PELRB shall be petitioned under the provisions of 273-A: 12.

  • External Arbitration Procedures Any arbitration initiated under this LGIA shall be conducted before a single neutral arbitrator appointed by the Parties. If the Parties fail to agree upon a single arbitrator within ten (10) Calendar Days of the submission of the dispute to arbitration, each Party shall choose one arbitrator who shall sit on a three-member arbitration panel. The two arbitrators so chosen shall within twenty (20) Calendar Days select a third arbitrator to chair the arbitration panel. In either case, the arbitrators shall be knowledgeable in electric utility matters, including electric transmission and bulk power issues, and shall not have any current or past substantial business or financial relationships with any party to the arbitration (except prior arbitration). The arbitrator(s) shall provide each of the Parties an opportunity to be heard and, except as otherwise provided herein, shall conduct the arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association (“Arbitration Rules”) and any applicable FERC regulations; provided, however, in the event of a conflict between the Arbitration Rules and the terms of this Article 27, the terms of this Article 27 shall prevail.

  • BIDDING PROCEDURES TO KEEP IN MIND 1. All bidding is open to the public. You will need to raise your hand or call out your bid as the auctioneer asks for bids. It is easy! Don't be bashful! This is a one-time opportunity. Watch the auctioneer and his bid assistants. They will take your bid and will assist you with any questions.

  • BIDDING PROCEDURES 4.1. Bidders have to login at EHSAN AUCTIONEERS SDN. BHD. Website using the same registered email 30 minute before Auction Time.

  • Closing Procedures Subject to satisfaction or waiver by the relevant Party of the conditions of Closing set forth herein, at the Time of Closing the Vendors shall deliver actual possession of the Purchased Shares and the requisite instruments of conveyance and upon such delivery the Purchaser shall pay or satisfy the Purchase Price in accordance with Section 2.03. The transfer of possession of the Purchased Shares shall be deemed to take effect as at the Time of Closing.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.