Hearing Body Sample Clauses

Hearing Body. “Hearing Body” shall mean a group established with authority to conduct and render decisions in a formal compliance hearing of an entity registered in the NERC compliance registry who is the subject of a notice of alleged violation, proposed penalty or sanction, contested mitigation plan or contested remedial action directive.
Hearing Body. The General Manager of the Sonoma County Water Agency shall act as a separate and final hearing body for layoff appeals for all full-time and part-time employees.
Hearing Body. 2 Section 1.13. Industry Sector 2 Section 1.14. Large LSEs 2 Section 1.15. Medium LSEs 2 Section 1.16. Members 2 Section 1.17. NERC 2 Section 1.18. NERC Rules 2 Section 1.19. Net Energy for Load 3 Section 1.20. Person 3 Section 1.21. Region 3 Section 1.22. Regional Entity 3 Section 1.23. Regional Variance 3 Section 1.24. Regional Reliability Standard 3 Section 1.25. Regular Member 3 Section 1.26. Regulatory Participant 3 Section 1.27. Related Party 4 Section 1.28. Reliability Coordinator 4 Section 1.29. Reliability Standard 4 Section 1.30. Reliable Operation 4 Section 1.31. RTOs 4 Section 1.32. Small LSEs 4 Section 1.33. Suppliers 4 Section 1.34. Transmission Companies 4
Hearing Body. The Hearing Body shall conduct all compliance proceedings in accordance with the hearing procedures set forth in the NERC Hearing Procedure.
Hearing Body. Texas RE will use the PUCT as its Hearing Body, and the PUCT (as Hearing Body) will issue recommendations to the Texas RE Board of Directors (“Board”) which will make final decisions following regional hearings of compliance matters. The PUCT is comprised of three Commissioners who are appointed by the Governor of the State of Texas. The PUCT has extensive experience in conducting contested case hearings and other adjudicatory proceedings in a manner that assures due process of law to all participants. Texas RE intends to rely upon the PUCT’s experience and expertise in conducting the hearing process under the Delegation Agreement. Texas RE believes that it is more efficient and cost-effective to use existing PUCT procedures than to attempt to establish a redundant hearing process within Texas RE. The PUCT is uniquely well-positioned to perform this function for the ERCOT Region since electric utilities operating in the ERCOT Region do not synchronously interconnect with electric utilities operating outside of Texas, and ERCOT market participants have experience in participating in PUCT proceedings.
Hearing Body. Texas RE will use the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) as its Hearing Body, and the PUCT (as Hearing Body) will issue recommendations to the Texas RE Chief Compliance Officer who will make final decisions following regional hearings of compliance matters. The PUCT has extensive experience in conducting contested case hearings and other adjudicatory proceedings in a manner that assures due process of law to all participants. Texas RE intends to rely upon the PUCT’s experience and expertise in conducting the hearing process under the Delegation Agreement. Texas RE believes that it is more efficient and cost-effective to use existing PUCT procedures than to attempt to establish a redundant hearing process within Texas RE. The PUCT is uniquely well-positioned to perform this function for the ERCOT Region since electric utilities operating in the ERCOT Region do not synchronously interconnect with electric utilities operating outside of Texas, and ERCOT market participants have experience in participating in PUCT proceedings.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Hearing Body. The Hearing Body, consisting of a quorum of the Commission, shall hear all proceedings brought under these Rules of Procedure, unless the Commission elects to delegate all or part of the proceeding to a Presiding Officer who is a member of the Commission Staff. The Hearing Body is vested with the exclusive authority to issue a final recommendation to the Chief Compliance Officer for the resolution of the issue(s) presented. The following procedures shall also apply:

Related to Hearing Body

  • Hearing The grievance shall be heard by a single arbitrator and both parties may be represented by such person or persons as they may choose and designate, and the parties shall have the right to a hearing at which time both parties will have the opportunity to submit evidence, offer testimony, and make oral or written arguments relating to the issues before the arbitrator. The proceeding before the arbitrator shall be a hearing denovo.

  • Hearing Tests Audiometric tests should be conducted within two months of a person commencing employment, and thereafter at intervals of two years.

  • Dispositive Motions Each party shall have the right to submit dispositive motions pursuant Rule 12 or Rule 56 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure (a “Dispositive Motion”). The party submitting the Dispositive Motion may, but is not required to, deliver to the arbitrator and to the other party a memorandum in support (the “Memorandum in Support”) of the Dispositive Motion. Within seven (7) calendar days of delivery of the Memorandum in Support, the other party shall deliver to the arbitrator and to the other party a memorandum in opposition to the Memorandum in Support (the “Memorandum in Opposition”). Within seven (7) calendar days of delivery of the Memorandum in Opposition, as applicable, the party that submitted the Memorandum in Support shall deliver to the arbitrator and to the other party a reply memorandum to the Memorandum in Opposition (“Reply Memorandum”). If the applicable party shall fail to deliver the Memorandum in Opposition as required above, or if the other party fails to deliver the Reply Memorandum as required above, then the applicable party shall lose its right to so deliver the same, and the Dispositive Motion shall proceed regardless.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!