Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage Sample Clauses

Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. Under Alternative C, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract as reconfigured to exclude Club Lake and the dwellings surrounding Club Lake. An estimated 2.59 million tons of recoverable coal are present on the 940-acre tract under this alternative. At an annual production rate of 200,000 to 400,000 tons of coal per year this equates to a mine life of approximately six to 12 years. Mining methods and elements of coal haulage would be the same under this alternative as under the Proposed Action. The property value and quality of life related impacts of Alternative C would be the same as those discussed in the analysis of impacts of the Proposed Action. The discussion above, particularly in Table 3-11, accounts for the differences between the action alternatives.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. Under Alternative C, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract as reconfigured to exclude Club Lake and the dwellings surrounding Club Lake. An estimated 2.59 million tons of recoverable coal are present on the tract under this alternative. At an annual production rate of 200,000 to 400,000 tons of coal per year this equates to a mine life of approximately six to 12 years. Mining methods and elements of coal haulage would be the same under this alternative as under the Proposed Action. As a result, the qualitative nature of impacts under Alternative C are the same as under the Proposed Action. However, estimated GHG emissions would be reduced under Alternative C because the total estimated recoverable coal and the mine life would be reduced compared to the Proposed Action. Table 3-3 reports mine-site GHG emissions, coal haulage GHG emissions via truck, barge and bulk cargo shipping GHG emissions, and end-use coal combustion GHG emissions under Alternative C. Alternative C would add a net amount of 7.8 to 8.4 million metric tons of CO2e to the atmosphere depending on the final destination of the coal. Leasing and mining the LBA tract under Alternative C would contribute well under 1% to state, national, and global emissions.
Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. Under Alternative C the BLM would lease the coal contained within the tract as reconfigured to exclude Club Lake and the dwellings surrounding Club Lake. Under this alternative, the tract would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. The tract under this alternative spans an area approximately 940 acres in extent. The qualitative nature of impacts under Alternative C would be the same as the Proposed Action because the same mining methods would be used to extract coal from the tract. However, the areal extent of the tract under this alternative is 330 acres smaller than under the Proposed Action. In addition, whereas subsidence is not anticipated under Club Lake under the Proposed Action as a result of the need to comply with applicable requirements listed above and in Table 2-1, there is no possibility (even remotely) that subsidence under Club Lake would occur under this alternative. This is because no underground mining under Club Lake and the dwellings surrounding Club Lake would occur under Alternative C.
Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. Under Alternative C the BLM would lease the coal contained within the tract as reconfigured to exclude Club Lake and the dwellings surrounding Club Lake. Under this alternative, the tract would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. The tract under this alternative spans an area approximately 940 acres in extent. By excluding the coal under Club Lake from the lease tract, the elevation and topography of the lake bottom would not change from its present state because there would be no possibility (even remotely) of subsidence. Furthermore, there would be no mine void below the lake that might possibly drain water from the lake. Mining operations conducted under Alternative C would preserve the integrity of Club Lake but otherwise affect surface water across the LBA tract in the same way as mining operations conducted under the Proposed Action.
Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. Under Alternative C the BLM would lease the coal contained within the tract as reconfigured to exclude Club Lake and the dwellings surrounding Club Lake. Under this alternative, the tract would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. The tract under this alternative spans an area approximately 940 acres in extent. Under this alternative, federal coal under Club Lake would remain un-mined, so there would be no mine void, either open or rubble-filled, into which the aquifer (or aquifers) tapped by Club Lake xxxxx might drain. The hydrogeologic setting is such that aquifers beneath the LBA tract and adjacent land are probably isolated. Consequently underground mining outside the Club Lake area is unlikely to affect Club Lake xxxxx. Mining operations conducted under Alternative C would otherwise affect groundwater across the LBA tract and adjacent areas in the same way as mining operations conducted under the Proposed Action.
Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. The economic impacts of Alternative C would be the same as Alternative B because annual production from the LBA tract is anticipated to be the same under both alternatives. However, the life of mining on the LBA tract would be less under Alternative C because fewer tons of recoverable coal (2.59 million tons versus 3.28 million tons) would be leased under this alternative. This would result in a shorter duration of economic contributions to local economies. The life of mining on the LBA tract under Alternative C would be 6-12 years, compared to 8-16 years for Alternative B. Under Alternative C, annualized economic impacts to Xxxxxxx and Le Flore counties would be positive, but for a shorter length of time, relative to Alternative B.
Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage. Under Alternative C, the LBA tract would be leased and underground mining methods would be used to produce an estimated 200,000-400,000 tons of bituminous (metallurgical) coal annually. Total recoverable coal from the LBA tract under Alternative C is estimated to be 2,592,000 tons which, depending on the level of annual production, translates to approximately 6-12 years of mining activity associated with the LBA tract as configured under this alternative. On an annual basis the effects of Alternative C would be the same as Alternative B, because annual production from the LBA tract is anticipated to remain constant over the production life of the LBA tract regardless of the alternative (Table 3-13). However, because there is less total available recoverable coal under Alternative C, the production life of the LBA tract would decrease by 2-4 years compared with the Proposed Action.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Impacts of Alternative C – Reduced Tract Acreage

  • How Do I Correct an Excess Contribution? If you make a contribution in excess of your allowable maximum, you may correct the excess contribution and avoid the 6% penalty tax under Section 4973 of the Internal Revenue Code for that year by withdrawing the excess contribution and its earnings on or before the due date, including extensions, of the tax return for the tax year for which the contribution was made (generally October 15th). Any earnings on the withdrawn excess contribution may be subject to a 10% early distribution penalty tax if you are under age 59½. In addition, in certain cases an excess contribution may be withdrawn after the time for filing your tax return. Finally, excess contributions for one year may be carried forward and applied against the contribution limitation in succeeding years.

  • Method of Selecting Types and Interest Periods for New Advances The Borrower shall select the Type of Advance and, in the case of each Eurodollar Advance, the Interest Period applicable thereto from time to time. The Borrower shall give the Administrative Agent irrevocable notice (a "Borrowing Notice") not later than 11:00 a.m. (Chicago time) on the Borrowing Date of each Floating Rate Advance and not later than 11:00 a.m. (Chicago time) three Business Days before the Borrowing Date for each Eurodollar Advance, specifying: (i) the Borrowing Date, which shall be a Business Day, of such Advance, (ii) the aggregate amount of such Advance, (iii) the Type of Advance selected, and (iv) in the case of each Eurodollar Advance, the Interest Period applicable thereto. Not later than noon (Chicago time) on each Borrowing Date, each Lender shall make available its Loan or Loans in funds immediately available in Chicago to the Administrative Agent at its address specified pursuant to Article XIII. The Administrative Agent will make the funds so received from the Lenders available to the Borrower at the Administrative Agent's aforesaid address.

  • Reallocation of Applicable Percentages to Reduce Fronting Exposure During any period in which there is a Defaulting Lender, for purposes of computing the amount of the obligation of each non-Defaulting Lender to acquire, refinance or fund participations in Letters of Credit or Swing Line Loans pursuant to Sections 2.03 and 2.04, the “Applicable Percentage” of each non-Defaulting Lender shall be computed without giving effect to the Commitment of that Defaulting Lender; provided, that, (i) each such reallocation shall be given effect only if, at the date the applicable Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, no Default or Event of Default exists; and (ii) the aggregate obligation of each non-Defaulting Lender to acquire, refinance or fund participations in Letters of Credit and Swing Line Loans shall not exceed the positive difference, if any, of (1) the Commitment of that non-Defaulting Lender minus (2) the aggregate Outstanding Amount of the Committed Loans of that Lender.

  • Loss Mitigation and Consideration of Alternatives (i) For each Single Family Shared-Loss Loan in default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution shall undertake reasonable and customary loss mitigation efforts, in accordance with any of the following programs selected by Assuming Institution in its sole discretion, Exhibit 5 (FDIC Mortgage Loan Modification Program), the United States Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program Guidelines or any other modification program approved by the United States Treasury Department, the Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any other governmental agency (it being understood that the Assuming Institution can select different programs for the various Single Family Shared-Loss Loans) (such program chosen, the “Modification Guidelines”). After selecting the applicable Modification Guideline for each such Single Family Shared-Loss Loan, the Assuming Institution shall document its consideration of foreclosure, loan restructuring under the applicable Modification Guideline chosen, and short-sale (if short-sale is a viable option) alternatives and shall select the alternative the Assuming Institution believes, based on its estimated calculations, will result in the least Loss. If unemployment or underemployment is the primary cause for default or for which a default is reasonably foreseeable, the Assuming Institution may consider the borrower for a temporary forbearance plan which reduces the loan payment to an affordable level for at least six (6) months. (ii) Losses on Home Equity Loans shall be shared under the charge-off policies of the Assuming Institution’s Examination Criteria as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iii) Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans shall be treated as Restructured Loans, and with the consent of the Receiver can be restructured under terms separate from the Exhibit 5 standards. Please refer to Exhibits 2(a)(1)-(2) for guidance in Calculation of Loss for Restructured Loans. Losses on Investor-Owned Residential Loans will be treated as if they were Single Family Shared-Loss Loans. (iv) The Assuming Institution shall retain its loss calculations for the Shared Loss Loans and such calculations shall be provided to the Receiver upon request. For the avoidance of doubt and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (x) the Assuming Institution is not required to modify or restructure any Shared-Loss Loan on more than one occasion and (y) the Assuming Institution is not required to consider any alternatives with respect to any Shared-Loss Loan in the process of foreclosure as of the Bank Closing if the Assuming Institution can document that a loan modification is not cost effective and shall be entitled to continue such foreclosure measures and recover the Foreclosure Loss as provided herein, and (z) the Assuming Institution shall have a transition period of up to 90 days after Bank Closing to implement the Modification Guidelines, during which time, the Assuming Institution may submit claims under such guidelines as may be in place at the Failed Bank.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Xxxx has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Xxxx. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Xxxx (e.g. hairpinning): 1. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to any spare copper that exists to the customer premises. 2. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to an existing DLC that is not integrated. 3. If capacity exists, provide "side-door" porting through the switch. 4. If capacity exists, provide "Digital Access Cross Connect System (DACS)- door" porting (if the IDLC routes through a DACS prior to integration into the switch). 2.6.2 Arrangements 3 and 4 above require the use of a designed circuit. Therefore, non- designed Loops such as the SL1 voice grade and UCL-ND may not be ordered in these cases. 2.6.3 If no alternate facility is available, and upon request from Xxxx, and if agreed to by both Parties, BellSouth may utilize its Special Construction (SC) process to determine the additional costs required to provision facilities. Xxxx will then have the option of paying the one-time SC rates to place the Loop.

  • Ameliorative Allocations Any special allocations of income or gain pursuant to Sections 5.05(b) or 5.05(c) hereof shall be taken into account in computing subsequent allocations pursuant to Section 5.04 and this Section 5.05(g), so that the net amount of any items so allocated and all other items allocated to each Partner shall, to the extent possible, be equal to the net amount that would have been allocated to each Partner if such allocations pursuant to Sections 5.05(b) or 5.05(c) had not occurred.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2022-23, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2024-25 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2024, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

  • Eligible Population 5.1 Program eligibility is determined by applicable law set forth in Program rules and the requirements established in the Program Policy Manual. 5.2 The unduplicated number of Clients for PHC services is 430. This represents the Grantee’s projected number of unduplicated Clients to be served during the Contract period. If during the Contract period it is foreseen that the Grantee might be unable to serve the contracted number of children, HHSC may reduce the Grantee’s grant award amount.

  • Reallocation of Participations to Reduce Fronting Exposure All or any part of such Defaulting Lender’s participation in L/C Obligations and Swingline Loans shall be reallocated among the Non-Defaulting Lenders in accordance with their respective Revolving Credit Commitment Percentages (calculated without regard to such Defaulting Lender’s Revolving Credit Commitment) but only to the extent that (x) the conditions set forth in Section 6.2 are satisfied at the time of such reallocation (and, unless the Borrower shall have otherwise notified the Administrative Agent at such time, the Borrower shall be deemed to have represented and warranted that such conditions are satisfied at such time), and (y) such reallocation does not cause the aggregate Revolving Credit Exposure of any Non-Defaulting Lender to exceed such Non-Defaulting Lender’s Revolving Credit Commitment. No reallocation hereunder shall constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder against a Defaulting Lender arising from that Lender having become a Defaulting Lender, including any claim of a Non-Defaulting Lender as a result of such Non-Defaulting Lender’s increased exposure following such reallocation.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!