IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The impacts within CSLC jurisdiction that are identified below were determined in the Final EIR and Addendum to be potentially significant absent mitigation; after application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant. For the full text of each mitigation measure (MM), please refer to Exhibit C, Attachment C-1.
1. Air Quality AQ-1, AQ-2, AQ-3, AQ-4
2. Noise N-1
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The following impacts were determined in the PEIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation: WQ 4.2.6, HAZ 4.3.2, BIO 4.5.1, BIO 4.5.2, BIO 4.5.3, BIO 4.5.4, and BIO
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The impacts identified below were determined in the Final EIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation; after application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant. For the full text of each mitigation measure (MM), please refer to Exhibit C, Attachment C-1.
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The following impacts were determined in the EIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation: AQ-1, MBIO-1, MBIO-2, MBIO-3, TBIO-3, HAZ-2, HYD-1, HYD-2, NOI-1, and TRA-4. After application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant.
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The impacts identified below were determined in the Final EIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation; after application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant.
1. Air Quality 3.2-1
2. Cultural Resources 3.4-1, 3.4-3, 3.4-4
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The impacts identified in the table below were determined in the Final EIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation; after application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant. For the full text of each mitigation measure (MM), please refer to Exhibit C, Attachment C-1. 2 See Public Resources Code section 21081, subdivision (a) and State CEQA Guidelines section 15091, subdivision (a).
1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas AQ-1; AQ-C
2. Biological Resources: Fisheries BF-1
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The impacts identified below (within CSLC’s jurisdiction) were determined in the Final EIR/EIS to be potentially significant absent mitigation; after application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant.
1. Water Quality WQ-1, WQ-2, WQ-5
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The following impacts were determined in the EIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation: AQ-2, NO-1, NO-2, HY-7, HY-8, and HY-11. After application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant.
A. AIR QUALITY CEQA FINDING NO. AQ-2
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The impacts identified below were determined in the Final SEIR to be potentially significant absent mitigation; after application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant. For the full text of each mitigation measure (MM), please refer to Exhibit C, Attachment C-1.
1. Water Quality and Groundwater Resources Effect WQ-3; Effect WQ-5
2. Air Quality Effect AQ-3 3. Vegetation and Wetlands Effect VEG-2; Effect VEG‐3
IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS WITH MITIGATION. The following impacts related to the CSLC’s discretionary action were determined in the EIR/EIS to be potentially significant absent mitigation: AQ Impacts #1, #2 and #3, Bio Impacts #10, #11, #17 and #37, VQ Impacts #1 and #2, and Arch Impact #1. After application of mitigation, however, the impacts were determined to be less than significant.
