Interaction during Monitor’s assessment process Sample Clauses

Interaction during Monitor’s assessment process. Debrief meeting Monitor’s Directorate and TDA Delivery and Development Directorate, and representatives of TDA Finance, Clinical directorates agree to meet within 2 weeks of referral from TDA to Monitor of an applicant to enable the TDA to share intelligence and the rationale for their support of the FT application. This meeting will include Director level representation from both organisations and will usually cover:  The Local Health Economy;  Assessment of Trust Board and management;  The test of financial viability  Quality of service issues, including Ombudsman complaints information  Performance against national and contractual targets Ongoing interaction It is agreed that high level information on progress of individual assessments will be shared by Monitor with the TDA in the regular monthly regional update calls. Accountability for performance and quality oversight of an applicant resides with the TDA for the duration of an assessment, and until and applicant passes an assessment and becomes an NHS foundation trust. Monitor will continue to direct individuals wishing to pass information about an NHS trust to the TDA for the TDA to address in line with its oversight role. Monitor will also offer to forward on an individual’s concerns direct to the TDA, if the individual gives their consent to do so. Similarly, the TDA will direct individuals wishing to pass on information about foundation trusts to Monitor, and will offer to forward concerns direct to Monitor if the individual gives their consent to do so. The TDA will share with Monitor the outcome of any investigation in respect of any information provided to it at the request of the Provider Appraisal Directorate. It is acknowledged by both parties that in such cases Monitor may seek direct information from the applicant NHS Trust to support its assessment work. In all cases this agreement to share of information will not supersede the legal obligations of either party Letter of confirmation prior to authorisation decision The TDA will provide Monitor with letter setting out that the TDA is not aware of issues that would alter the recommendation to support the trust’s FT application one week prior to the scheduled Monitor Provider Appraisal executive at which an applicant Trust is due to be considered. Assessment decision Monitor’s Provider Appraisal Directorate will copy in the relevant TDA regional director of Delivery and Development into any formal correspondence from Monitor communicat...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Interaction during Monitor’s assessment process

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

  • Change Management Process If Customer or Oracle requests a change in any of the specifications, requirements, Deliverables, or scope (including drawings and designs) of the Professional Services described in any Statement of Work, the party seeking the change shall propose the applicable changes by written notice. Within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the written notice, each party’s project leads shall meet, either in person or via telephone conference, to discuss and agree upon the proposed changes. Oracle will prepare a change order describing the proposed changes to the Statement of Work and the applicable change in fees and expenses, if any (each, a “Change Order”). Change Orders are not binding unless and until they are executed by both parties. Executed Change Orders shall be deemed part of, and subject to, this Addendum. If the parties disagree about the proposed changes, the parties shall promptly escalate the change request to their respective senior management for resolution.

  • CENTRAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Boards Collective Bargaining Act central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply.

  • Performance Improvement Process 9.5.1 The purpose of the Performance Improvement Process is to remedy or mitigate the impact of a Performance Factor. The Performance Improvement Process may include: a requirement that the Hospital develop an Improvement Plan; or an amendment of the Hospital’s obligations as mutually agreed by the parties.

  • Hearing Tests Audiometric tests should be conducted within two months of a person commencing employment, and thereafter at intervals of two years.

  • Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.

  • CHILD AND DEPENDENT ADULT/ELDER ABUSE REPORTING CONTRACTOR shall establish a procedure acceptable to ADMINISTRATOR to ensure that all employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement report child abuse or neglect to one of the agencies specified in Penal Code Section 11165.9 and dependent adult or elder abuse as defined in Section 15610.07 of the WIC to one of the agencies specified in WIC Section 15630. CONTRACTOR shall require such employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement to sign a statement acknowledging the child abuse reporting requirements set forth in Sections 11166 and 11166.05 of the Penal Code and the dependent adult and elder abuse reporting requirements, as set forth in Section 15630 of the WIC, and shall comply with the provisions of these code sections, as they now exist or as they may hereafter be amended.

  • Meetings During the Grievance Process 22.4.1 Subject to operational requirements,

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Seniority Verification Process i. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee achieves continuing contract status.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.