Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions Sample Clauses

Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Each Party shall retain all rights to control any actions initiated prior to the Effective Date.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Agreement PDC or Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise mutually determined by the Parties and except for any interferences involving any Licensed Intellectual Property or other Patent Rights Controlled by CytomX which shall be governed by Section 6.2, Pfizer shall control such action and shall select counsel for such action. The rights and obligations of the Parties under Section 6.4 are expressly subject to this Section 6.3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, CytomX shall retain all rights to control any actions initiated by CytomX prior to the Effective Date, provided that CytomX shall keep Pfizer reasonably informed of, and shall consider in good faith, any recommendations made by Pfizer in connection with such actions.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Agreement CAR-T or Allogene Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties will consult with one another and will [***] in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise mutually determined by the Parties, Allogene will control such action and will select counsel for such action. The rights and obligations of the Parties under Section 6.4 are expressly subject to this Section 6.3.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Agreement CAR-T or Pfizer Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties will consult with one another and will [***] in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise mutually determined by the Parties, if (i) such impasse exists during the Research Term then Cellectis will control such action and will select counsel for such action and (ii) such impasse exists following the Research Term then Pfizer will control such action and will select counsel for such action. The rights and obligations of the Parties under Section 6.4 are expressly subject to this Section 6.3.
Sample 1
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties, though the Joint Patent Committee, mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the ‘Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise determined by the Joint Patent Committee, Wyeth will control such action and shall select counsel for such action. Wyeth shall be responsible for, and shall bear, all the out-of-pocket expenses of such action; provided that Trubion shall reimburse Wyeth for twenty percent (20%) of the out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. Wyeth shall submit invoices to Trubion for such expenses, such invoices to be accompanied by supporting documentation reasonably showing the expenses so incurred. Trubion shall have the right to participate in and be represented by independent counsel in such action at its own expense.
Sample 1
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or ***Certain information contained herein has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Each Party shall retain all rights to control any actions initiated prior to the Effective Date.
Sample 1
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions

  • Declaratory Judgment Actions In the event that a declaratory judgment action is brought against M.I.T. or COMPANY by a third party alleging invalidity, unenforceability, or non-infringement of the PATENT RIGHTS, M.I.T., at its option, shall have the right within twenty (20) days after commencement of such action to take over the sole defense of the action at its own expense. If M.I.T. does not exercise this right, COMPANY may take over the sole defense of the action at COMPANY's sole expense, subject to Sections 7.4 and 7.5.

  • Infringement Proceedings Each Party agrees to promptly notify the other Party of any unauthorized use of the other Party's Marks of which it has actual knowledge. Each Party will have the sole right and discretion to bring proceedings alleging infringement of its Marks or unfair competition related thereto; provided, however, that each Party agrees to provide the other Party with its reasonable cooperation and assistance with respect to any such infringement proceedings.

  • Litigation and Regulatory Proceedings Except as disclosed in SEC Documents, there are no material actions, causes of action, suits, claims, proceedings, inquiries or investigations (collectively, “Proceedings”) before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of Company or any of the Subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company or any of the Subsidiaries, the Common Stock or any other class of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Capital Stock, or any of the Company’s or the Subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such and, to the knowledge of the executive officers of the Company, there is no reason to believe that there is any basis for any such Proceeding.

  • Infringement Actions 7.1 LICENSEE shall inform UNIVERSITY promptly in writing of any alleged infringement of the PATENT RIGHTS by a third party and of any available evidence thereof.

  • Infringement Action In the event a Party brings an Infringement action in accordance with this Section 7.3 (the “Controlling Party”), such Controlling Party shall keep the other Party reasonably informed of the progress of any such action, and the other Party shall cooperate fully with the Controlling Party, including by providing information and materials, at the Controlling Party’s request and expense and if required to bring such action, the furnishing of a power of attorney or being named as a party. The other Party shall cooperate fully, including, if required to bring such action, the furnishing of a power of attorney or being named as a party. Neither Party shall have the right to settle any Infringement action under this Section 7.3 relating to Joint Patent Rights without the prior written consent of the other Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.

  • Third Party Proceedings The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee if Indemnitee is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the Company) by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, or any subsidiary of the Company, by reason of any action or inaction on the part of Indemnitee while an officer or director or by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by the Company, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner which Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, or, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, that Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe that Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful.

  • Enforcement Actions Either the Company or Executive may bring an action in court to compel arbitration under this Agreement and to enforce an arbitration award. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, neither party shall initiate or prosecute any lawsuit in any way related to any arbitrable claim, including without limitation any claim as to the making, existence, validity, or enforceability of the agreement to arbitrate. All arbitration hearings under this Agreement shall be conducted in Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Regulatory Proceedings The commencement of any rulemaking or disciplinary proceeding or the promulgation of any proposed or final rule which would have, or may reasonably be expected to have, a Material Adverse Effect;

  • Litigation and Judgments Except as specifically disclosed in Schedule 6.5 as of the date hereof, there is no action, suit, investigation, or proceeding before or by any Governmental Authority or arbitrator pending, or to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened against or affecting Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or any other Obligated Party that could, if adversely determined, result in a Material Adverse Event. There are no outstanding judgments against Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or any other Obligated Party.

  • Notice of Litigation and Judgments The Borrower will give notice to the Agent in writing within five (5) Business Days of becoming aware of any litigation or proceedings threatened in writing or any pending litigation and proceedings affecting the Borrower, any Guarantor or any of their respective Subsidiaries or to which the Borrower, any Guarantor or any of their respective Subsidiaries is or is to become a party involving an uninsured claim against the Borrower, any Guarantor or any of their respective Subsidiaries that could either reasonably be expected to cause a Default or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect and stating the nature and status of such litigation or proceedings. The Borrower will give notice to the Agent, in writing, in form and detail reasonably satisfactory to the Agent and each of the Lenders, within ten (10) days of any judgment not covered by insurance, whether final or otherwise, against the Borrower or any of their respective Subsidiaries in an amount in excess of $10,000,000.00.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!