Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions Sample Clauses

Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Agreement PDC or Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise mutually determined by the Parties and except for any interferences involving any Licensed Intellectual Property or other Patent Rights Controlled by CytomX which shall be governed by Section 6.2, Pfizer shall control such action and shall select counsel for such action. The rights and obligations of the Parties under Section 6.4 are expressly subject to this Section 6.3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, CytomX shall retain all rights to control any actions initiated by CytomX prior to the Effective Date, provided that CytomX shall keep Pfizer reasonably informed of, and shall consider in good faith, any recommendations made by Pfizer in connection with such actions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Each Party shall retain all rights to control any actions initiated prior to the Effective Date.
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Agreement CAR-T or Allogene Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties will consult with one another and will [***] in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise mutually determined by the Parties, Allogene will control such action and will select counsel for such action. The rights and obligations of the Parties under Section 6.4 are expressly subject to this Section 6.3.
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable in connection with any Agreement CAR-T or Pfizer Licensed Product to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation, post-grant review or other patent office proceedings or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the Parties will consult with one another and will [***] in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise mutually determined by the Parties, if (i) such impasse exists during the Research Term then Cellectis will control such action and will select counsel for such action and (ii) such impasse exists following the Research Term then Pfizer will control such action and will select counsel for such action. The rights and obligations of the Parties under Section 6.4 are expressly subject to this Section 6.3. [***] CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions. If the Parties, though the Joint Patent Committee, mutually determine that, based upon the review of a Third Party’s patent or patent application or other intellectual property rights, it may be desirable to provoke or institute an interference, opposition, revocation or declaratory judgment action with respect thereto, then the ‘Parties shall consult with one another and shall reasonably cooperate in connection with such an action. Unless otherwise determined by the Joint Patent Committee, Wyeth will control such action and shall select counsel for such action. Wyeth shall be responsible for, and shall bear, all the out-of-pocket expenses of such action; provided that Trubion shall reimburse Wyeth for twenty percent (20%) of the out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. Wyeth shall submit invoices to Trubion for such expenses, such invoices to be accompanied by supporting documentation reasonably showing the expenses so incurred. Trubion shall have the right to participate in and be represented by independent counsel in such action at its own expense.
Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions 

Related to Interference, Opposition, Revocation and Declaratory Judgment Actions

  • Infringement Proceedings Each Party agrees to promptly notify the other Party of any unauthorized use of the other Party's Marks of which it has actual knowledge. Each Party will have the sole right and discretion to bring proceedings alleging infringement of its Marks or unfair competition related thereto; provided, however, that each Party agrees to provide the other Party with its reasonable cooperation and assistance with respect to any such infringement proceedings.

  • Infringement Actions Following an Option Exercise Date, subject to the provisions of any Voyager In-License, Genzyme shall have the sole and exclusive right, but not the obligation, to take any reasonable measures it deems appropriate with respect to any Competitive Infringement in the Genzyme Territory of any Genzyme Technology, Genzyme Collaboration Technology, Joint Collaboration Technology or Voyager Product-Specific Patent Rights, or with Voyager’s prior written consent, the Voyager Platform Patent Rights. Such measures may include (a) initiating or prosecuting an infringement, misappropriation or other appropriate suit or action (each an CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. “Infringement Action”) in the Genzyme Territory, or (b) subject to Section 11.1.5 (Genzyme Sublicense Rights), granting adequate rights and licenses to any Third Party necessary to render continued Competitive Infringement in the Genzyme Territory non-infringing. Voyager will consider in good faith any request from Genzyme to initiate an Infringement Action in the Genzyme Territory against any Third Party with respect to such Competitive Infringement of any Voyager Platform Patent Right; provided, however, that Voyager shall not be required to initiate any such Infringement Action or permit Genzyme to initiate any such Infringement Action with respect to any Voyager Platform Patent Right. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Genzyme does not inform Voyager that it intends to either initiate such an Infringement Action or grant adequate rights and licenses to such Third Party within [***] after Genzyme’s receipt of a notice of infringement pursuant to Section 15.4.1 (Notice of Infringement), then Voyager will have the second right, but not the obligation, to initiate such Infringement Action, but solely with respect to any Voyager Technology, Voyager Collaboration Technology, or Joint Collaboration Technology.

  • Third Party Proceedings The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee if Indemnitee is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the Company) by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, or any subsidiary of the Company, by reason of any action or inaction on the part of Indemnitee while an officer or director or by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by the Company, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner which Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, or, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, that Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe that Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful.

  • Enforcement Actions Each of Moriah and the Notes Collateral Agent agrees not to commence or take any Enforcement Action until an Enforcement Notice has been given by such Enforcing Party to the other Party. Subject to the foregoing, Moriah and the Notes Collateral Agent agree that during an Enforcement Period: (a) Moriah may, at its option, take and continue any Enforcement Action with respect to Moriah Senior Collateral and realize thereon, without the prior written consent of the Notes Collateral Agent, provided that during any Enforcement Period with respect to the Noteholder Senior Collateral, Moriah shall not commence or take any Enforcement Action or realize upon the Noteholder Senior Collateral without the Notes Collateral Agent's prior written consent. (b) Subject to the standstill period described in Section 2.3(e) below, the Notes Collateral Agent may, at its option, take and continue any Enforcement Action with respect to the Noteholder Senior Collateral and realize thereon without the prior written consent of Moriah, provided that during any Enforcement Period with respect to the Moriah Senior Collateral, the Notes Collateral Agent shall not commence or take any Enforcement Action or realize upon any of the Moriah Senior Collateral without Moriah's prior written consent. In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, during an Enforcement Period, the Notes Collateral Agent shall not take any action to enforce its rights under the Lockbox Agreement, whether pursuant to Section 2 thereof or otherwise. (c) If both Moriah and the Notes Collateral Agent elect to proceed with Enforcement Actions, then each shall proceed with the Enforcement Action of any security interests in or liens on any Collateral in which it has a senior lien or security interest, as described in and provided by Section 2.1, without prejudice to the other Party to join in any proceedings. (d) Each Enforcing Party shall so notify the other Party at such time as the Enforcing Party's Claim is Paid in Full. (e) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, but subject to the proviso at the end of this paragraph, the Notes Collateral Agent agrees that, during the first five (5) days of an Enforcement Period (the “Standstill Period”), it shall not take any action to realize on the Noteholder Senior Collateral, so as not to impair the collection by Moriah of Borrower’s outstanding accounts receivable during that period; provided, however, that the Notes Collateral Agent shall be entitled to take such action as it deems necessary in its sole discretion to (i) protect its secured position during the Standstill Period, (ii) protect its interest from claims or liens of third parties or governmental authorities, or (iii) preserve the Noteholder Senior Collateral from deterioration or diminishment.

  • Regulatory Proceedings The commencement of any rulemaking or disciplinary proceeding or the promulgation of any proposed or final rule which would have, or may reasonably be expected to have, a Material Adverse Effect;

  • Litigation and Judgments Except as specifically disclosed in Schedule 6.5 as of the date hereof, there is no action, suit, investigation, or proceeding before or by any Governmental Authority or arbitrator pending, or to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened against or affecting Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or any other Obligated Party that could, if adversely determined, result in a Material Adverse Event. There are no outstanding judgments against Borrower, any of its Subsidiaries, or any other Obligated Party.

  • Notice of Litigation and Judgments The Borrower will, and ---------------------------------- will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, give notice to the Agent and each of the Banks in writing within fifteen (15) days of becoming aware of any litigation or proceedings threatened in writing or any pending litigation and proceedings affecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or to which the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries is or becomes a party involving an uninsured claim against the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries that could reasonably be expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries and stating the nature and status of such litigation or proceedings. The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, give notice to the Agent and each of the Banks, in writing, in form and detail satisfactory to the Agent, within ten (10) days of any judgment not covered by insurance, final or otherwise, against the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries in an amount in excess of $1,000,000.

  • Third Party Litigation In the event that a Third Party institutes a patent or other infringement suit against any of NovaDel, PAR or HANA or any of its respective Affiliates during the Term, alleging manufacture, use or sale of a Licensed Product in the Territory, infringes one or more patent or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an “Infringement Suit”), the Parties shall cooperate with one another in defending such suit. PAR, as the NDA holder, shall have the first right to direct and control, at its expense, any Infringement Suit (including settlement negotiations, settlement or compromise thereof) to the extent that it relates to the manufacture, use or sale of a Licensed Product but does not implicate the Licensed Technology or Licensed Process. In the event that the Infringement Suit relates to the use of the Licensed Technology or Licensed Process, NovaDel shall have the first right to direct and control, at its expense, any such Infringement Suit (including settlement negotiations, settlement or compromise thereof). To the extent that any amounts become payable to any Third Party as a result of such action, whether through judgment or settlement, then PAR shall, unless HANA is jointly promoting and commercializing the Licensed Product pursuant to Section 2.4 and subject to Section 12.2, bear [***] percent ([***]%) of such amounts with respect to the Exploitation of the Licensed Product; provided, however, that PAR shall have the right to credit [***] percent ([***]%) of any amounts paid by PAR through judgment or settlement with respect to such country against the royalty payments to be paid by PAR to HANA with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product under Section 6.3; provided further, however, that no royalty payment when due, regardless of the amount or number of credits available to PAR shall be reduced by more than [***] percent ([***]%) of the amounts otherwise owed pursuant to Section 6.3 in any calendar quarter. Credits not exhausted in any calendar quarter may be carried into future calendar quarters. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that no payments are due or owing, or contemplated to be due or owing, by PAR to HANA under Article 6 with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product, then NovaDel shall pay to PAR such amount owed to a Third Party up to a cap of [***]% of such amount owed to such Third Party, less any amount already credited to PAR under this Section 10.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NovaDel shall have no obligation under this Section 10.3 for any costs, expenses or damages that are paid or payable to a Third Party as a result of an actual or alleged infringement by PAR or HANA to the extent such costs, expenses or damages result from the use of a Product Trademark.

  • Infringement and Litigation 11.1 Each party shall promptly notify the other in writing in the event that it obtains knowledge of infringing activity by third parties, or is sued or threatened with an infringement suit, in any country in the LICENSED TERRITORY as a result of activities that concern the LICENSED PATENTS, and shall supply the other party with documentation of the infringing activities that it possesses. 11.2 During the TERM of this Agreement: (a) LICENSEE shall have the first right (but not the obligation) to defend the LICENSED PATENTS against infringement or interference in the FIELD and in the LICENSED TERRITORY by third parties. This right includes bringing any legal action for infringement and defending any counter claim of invalidity or action of a third party for declaratory judgment for non-infringement or non-interference. If, in the reasonable opinion of LICENSEE’s counsel, YALE is required to be a named party to any such suit for standing purposes, LICENSEE may join YALE as a party; provided, however, that (i) YALE shall not be the first named party in any such action, (ii) the pleadings and any public statements about the action shall state that the action is being pursued by LICENSEE and that LICENSEE has joined YALE as a party; and (iii) LICENSEE shall keep YALE reasonably apprised of all developments in any such action. LICENSEE may settle such suits solely in its own name and solely at its own expense and through counsel of its own selection; provided, however, that no settlement shall be entered without YALE’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. Without limiting the foregoing, YALE may withhold its consent to any settlement that would in any manner affect the validity, scope or enforceability of any LICENSED PATENT. LICENSEE shall bear the expense of such legal actions. Except for providing reasonable assistance (including joining such actions as described above), at the request and expense of LICENSEE, YALE shall have no obligation regarding the legal actions described in Article 11.2 unless required to participate by law. However, YALE shall have the right to participate in any such action through its own counsel and at its own expense. Any recovery shall first be applied to LICENSEE’s out of pocket expenses and second shall be applied to YALE’s out of pocket expenses, including legal fees. YALE shall recover [***]% of any excess recovery over those expenses. (b) In the event LICENSEE fails to initiate and pursue or participate in the actions described in Article 11.2(a) or in lieu of such actions to initiate negotiations for a sublicense of the infringer, and the infringement has not otherwise abated, within [***] of notification of infringement from YALE, YALE may, in its sole discretion, convert the LICENSE granted in Article 3 to a non-exclusive license. Additionally, YALE shall have the right to initiate legal action such as that described in Article 11.2(a) at its own expense. If, in the reasonable opinion of YALE’s counsel, LICENSEE is required to be a named party to any such suit for standing purposes, YALE may join LICENSEE as party plaintiff to uphold the LICENSED PATENTS, provided, however, that YALE shall keep LICENSEE reasonably apprised of all developments in any such action. In such case, LICENSEE shall provide reasonable assistance to YALE if requested to do so, at YALE’s expense. YALE may settle such actions solely through its own counsel any recovery shall be retained by YALE. YALE may terminate the LICENSE in the country where such legal action is taken. (c) In the event LICENSEE is permanently enjoined from exercising its LICENSE under this Agreement pursuant to an infringement action brought by a third party, or if both LICENSEE and YALE elect not to undertake the defense or settlement of a suit alleging infringement for a period of [***] from notice of such suit, then either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in the country where the suit was filed with respect to the LICENSED PATENT following [***] written notice to the other party in accordance with the terms of Article 15.

  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions The Company, the Bank and its other Subsidiaries are in compliance in all material respects with all laws administered by and regulations of any Governmental Agency applicable to it or to them, the failure to comply with which would have a Material Adverse Effect. None of the Company, the Bank, the Company’s or the Bank’s Subsidiaries nor any of their officers or directors is now operating under any restrictions, agreements, memoranda, commitment letter, supervisory letter or similar regulatory correspondence, or other commitments (other than restrictions of general application) imposed by any Governmental Agency, nor are, to the Company’s knowledge, (a) any such restrictions threatened, (b) any agreements, memoranda or commitments being sought by any Governmental Agency, or (c) any legal or regulatory violations previously identified by, or penalties or other remedial action previously imposed by, any Governmental Agency remains unresolved.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!