INTERNAL BENCHMARKING Sample Clauses

INTERNAL BENCHMARKING. (i) On an annual basis Exult Supplier shall conduct an internal benchmarking exercise to measure (i) the quality of Exult Supplier's provision of the Services against the Service Levels, as well as, (if appropriate,) against Exult Supplier's [***]* and (ii) the [***]* against charging methodology set out in Schedule C.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to INTERNAL BENCHMARKING

  • Benchmarking 6.5.1. Not earlier than [***], Company shall have the right, but not the obligation, to conduct a measurement and comparison benchmarking process to compare [***] to ensure that Company is receiving [***], given the nature, volume and type of Services provided by Amdocs hereunder (taking into account the volume of Services, the skill sets and geographical location of the Personnel and other such factors necessary to ensure a like-for-like comparison to the benchmark comparator group) (the “Benchmarking Process”). Upon Amdocs’ receipt of notice of Company’s intent to exercise its benchmarking right, the Parties shall agree on a pool of suitably qualified, experienced and independent benchmarkers generally in the business of conducting such measurements and comparisons. The pool of benchmarkers shall not include any Person that is an Amdocs Competitor. It is the Parties’ intention that they shall jointly select the benchmarker to carry out the Benchmarking Process. However, in the event that the Parties are unable to agree as to the identification of such benchmarker, after escalation of this matter to Company’s Senior Vice President (IT) and Amdocs’ Vice President, then Company may utilize any Third Party benchmarker from the pool to perform the Benchmarking Process (the “Benchmarker”). The Benchmarker will review its benchmarking methodology with Company and Amdocs and the Parties shall agree to the criteria used for selection of the benchmark comparator group prior to commencement of the Benchmarking Process. Amdocs shall have reasonable * Confidential treatment has been requested. The redacted material has been separately filed with the Commission. opportunities to make submissions to the Benchmarker as to the performance of the Services and the related pricing. Company shall pay the fees and expenses charged by the Benchmarker (which fees will not be contingency-based). Amdocs’ cooperation with the Benchmarker shall be conditioned on the Benchmarker’s compliance with Amdocs’ commercially reasonable confidentiality requirements; provided, that, Amdocs shall not be obligated to disclose Confidential Information related to any of Amdocs’ or its Affiliates’ other clients to the Benchmarker. The Benchmarking Process shall be conducted so as not to unreasonably disrupt Amdocs’ operations under this Agreement (including so as not to lead to any material impact on the Service Levels).

  • Internal Review The Borrower shall conduct internal reviews to determine the value of all Eligible Portfolio Investments at least once each calendar week which shall take into account any events of which the Borrower has knowledge that adversely affect the value of any Eligible Portfolio Investment (each such value, an “Internal Value”).

  • Internal Control The Company has established and maintains “internal control over financial reporting” (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the 0000 Xxx) that (i) are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and (ii) have been evaluated by the management of the Company (including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) for effectiveness as of the end of the Company’s most recent fiscal year. In addition, not later than the date of the filing with the Commission of the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, each of the accountants and the audit committee of the board of directors of the Company had been advised of (x) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and (y) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Since the date of the most recent evaluation of such controls and procedures, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

  • Internal Controls The Company shall maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary in order to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to maintain accountability for assets; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.

  • Diversification 6.1. The Fund will at all times invest money from the Contracts in such a manner as to ensure that the Contracts will be treated as variable contracts under the Code and the regulations issued thereunder. Without limiting the scope of the foregoing, the Fund will at all times comply with Section 817(h) of the Code and Treasury Regulation 1.817-5, relating to the diversification requirements for variable annuity, endowment, or life insurance contracts and any amendments or other modifications to such Section or Regulations. In the event of a breach of this Article VI by the Fund, it will take all reasonable steps (a) to notify Company of such breach and (b) to adequately diversify the Fund so as to achieve compliance within the grace period afforded by Regulation 1.817-5.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Internal References Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to Articles, Sections and paragraphs shall refer to the corresponding articles, sections and paragraphs in this Agreement and references to the parties shall mean the parties to this Agreement.

  • Quoted Investments External Review With respect to Portfolio Investments (including Cash Equivalents) for which market quotations are readily available, the Borrower shall, not less frequently than once each calendar week, determine the market value of such Portfolio Investments which shall, in each case, be determined in accordance with one of the following methodologies (as selected by the Borrower):

  • Company Procedures Whenever the Company is required by this Agreement to effect the registration of any Registrable Securities under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration statement, the Company shall use its best efforts to effect each such registration to permit the sale of such Registrable Securities in accordance with the intended method or methods of disposition thereof, and pursuant thereto the Company shall, as soon as practicable:

  • Testing Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the Tests, and will not be obligated to perform additional procedures on any Review Receivable or to provide any information other than a Review Report. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may provide additional information in a Review Report about any Review Receivable that it determines in good faith to be material to the Asset Representations Review.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.