Job Order Proposal Review Sample Clauses

Job Order Proposal Review. The Owner and the Contractor shall review Contractor’s Job Order Proposal and negotiate any changes, clarifications or modifications as required. The Contractor shall submit a revised Job Order Proposal incorporating any changes, clarifications or modifications made in the review process. The Owner may accept, reject or seek modification of any Job Order Proposal.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Order Proposal Review. Owner shall review each Job Order Proposal and advise Contractor of any provisions Owner determines are unacceptable. Owner and Contractor shall negotiate in good faith to resolve any issues and to formulate changes, clarifications or modifications to any Job Order Proposal(s) as required. Contractor shall submit a revised Job Order Proposal incorporating any such changes, clarifications or modifications made in the review process. Owner may accept, reject or seek modification of any Job Order Proposal.‌
Sample 1Sample 2
Job Order Proposal Review. Each Price Proposal received from Contractor will be reviewed in detail for the appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the work duration schedule and list of Subcontractors. County will evaluate the proposed work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of work units proposed. County will determine whether The Contractor may choose the means and methods of construction; subject, Contractor that: a. Will constitute or create a hazard to the work, or to persons or property; b. Will not produce finished work in accordance with the terms of the Contract; or c. Unnecessarily increases the price of the Job Order when alternative means and methods are available.
Sample 1
Job Order Proposal Review. Each Price Proposal received from Contractor will be reviewed in detail for the appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the work duration schedule and list of Subcontractors. County will evaluate the proposed work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of work units proposed. County will determine whether Contractor that: a. Will constitute or create a hazard to the work, or to persons or property; b. Will not produce finished work in accordance with the terms of the Contract; or c. Unnecessarily increases the price of the Job Order when alternative means and methods are available.
Sample 1
Job Order Proposal Review. Each Price Proposal received from Contractor will be reviewed in detail for the appropriateness of quantities and tasks selected. Submittals will be reviewed, as well as the work duration schedule and list of Subcontractors. County will evaluate the proposed work units and may compare them with the independent County estimate of the same tasks to determine the reasonableness of approach, including the nature and number of work units proposed. County will determine whether Contractor’s Price Proposal is acceptable. The Contractor may choose the means and methods of construction; subject, however, to the County’s right to reject any means and methods proposed by the Contractor that: 1. Will constitute or create a hazard to the work, or to persons or property; 2. Will not produce finished work in accordance with the terms of the Contract; or 3. Unnecessarily increases the price of the Job Order when alternative means and methods are available.
Sample 1

Related to Job Order Proposal Review

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Staffing Plan The Board and the Association agree that optimum class size is an important aspect of the effective educational program. The Polk County School Staffing Plan shall be constructed each year according to the procedures set forth in Board Policy and, upon adoption, shall become Board Policy.

  • Training Plan 19.6.1 An apprentice shall be a party to an individual Training Plan. 19.6.2 The Training Plan sets out the training that the apprentice will do both on – the – job and off – the – job. The Training Plan also sets out how the Registered Training Organisation (RTO) will ensure the apprentice will receive quality training – both on – the – job and off – the – job. 19.6.3 The Training Plan reflects the choices made by the employer and the apprentice in relation to:-

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Questions About Review The Asset Representations Reviewer will make appropriate personnel available to respond in writing to written questions or requests for clarification of any Review Report from the Indenture Trustee or the Servicer until the earlier of (i) the payment in full of the Notes and (ii) one year after the delivery of the Review Report. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to respond to questions or requests for clarification from a Noteholder or any other Person and will direct such Persons to submit written questions or requests to the Indenture Trustee.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Request for Proposals A State request inviting proposals for Goods or Services. This Contract shall be governed by the statutes, regulations and procedures of the State of Connecticut, Department of Administrative Services.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!