Jurisdiction; Conflicts of Law Sample Clauses

Jurisdiction; Conflicts of Law. Each party hereby: (1) designates the federal and state courts of competent jurisdiction located in Cleveland, Ohio, as the exclusive courts of proper jurisdiction and venue of and for any and all lawsuits or other legal proceedings relating to this Agreement; (2) irrevocably consents to such designation, jurisdiction and venue; and, (3) waives any objection or defense relating to jurisdiction or venue with respect to any lawsuit or other legal proceeding initiated in or transferred to federal and state courts of competent jurisdiction located in Cleveland, Ohio. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio without regard to its principles regarding conflicts of laws.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Jurisdiction; Conflicts of Law. Each party hereby: (1) designates the federal and state courts of competent jurisdiction located in the District of Columbia, as the exclusive courts of proper jurisdiction and venue of and for any and all lawsuits or other legal proceedings relating to this Agreement; (2) irrevocably consents to such designation, jurisdiction and venue; and, (3) waives any objection or defense relating to jurisdiction or venue with respect to any lawsuit or other legal proceeding initiated in or transferred to federal and state courts of competent jurisdiction located in the District of Columbia. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the District of Columbia without regard to its principles regarding conflicts of laws. Mutual Binding Arbitration: Applicant and VIS® agree that any claims or controversies, whether such claims or controversies arose prior to, on, or subsequent to the date of this Agreement, which they bring against each other, the Administrator or any of the present or former officers, directors, employees, agents, or representatives of Applicant, VIS®, or the Administrator shall be resolved by binding arbitration in the District of Columbia. Applicant and VIS® agree that the results of the arbitration shall be final and binding, the arbitrator’s award is not required to include factual findings or legal reasoning, and that their rights to appeal or to seek modification of rulings by the arbitrator is strictly limited. Applicant and VIS® shall agree to the arbitrator. If they do not, VIS® shall provide Applicant with the names of two additional arbitrators which are members of the American Arbitration Association, of which Applicant shall select one. Except for contrary provisions contained in this section, Applicant and VIS® agree that all arbitration shall be governed by the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Headers: Headers in this Agreement are used for organizational purposes and shall not be interpreted to convey any meaning. Incorporation of Terminology from “Terms and Conditions of Insurance” and “Application for

Related to Jurisdiction; Conflicts of Law

  • Choice of Law; Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to the principles of conflict of laws. The parties further agree that any action between them shall be heard in New York County, New York, and expressly consent to the jurisdiction and venue of the Supreme Court of New York, sitting in New York County, New York and the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, sitting in New York, New York, for the adjudication of any civil action asserted pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Conflict of Laws The provisions of this Agreement shall be subject to all applicable statutes, laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, the applicable provisions of the ICA and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. To the extent that any provision contained herein conflicts with any such applicable provision of law or regulation, the latter shall control. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted and defined in a manner consistent with the provisions and definitions of the ICA. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held or made invalid by a court decision, statute, rule or otherwise, the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall not be affected by such invalidity.

  • Choice of Law and Jurisdiction California law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Agreement. The parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve informally and promptly any dispute that arises under this Agreement. Jurisdiction for any legal action arising from this Agreement shall exclusively reside in state or federal courts located in California, and the parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction of such courts.

  • Venue and Choice of Law In the event of litigation concerning this agreement, venue shall be in the First Judicial District, Xxxxx and Xxxxx County, Montana, and this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Montana both as to interpretation and performance.

  • Choice of Law The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

  • Choice of Laws Venue for any lawsuit brought to enforce any term or condition of this Agreement or to construe the terms hereof shall lie exclusively in the State of New York. This Agreement shall be construed under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to the application of its conflicts of law principles.

  • Forum and Choice of Law The parties deem the Contract to have been made in the City of Hartford, State of Connecticut. Both parties agree that it is fair and reasonable for the validity and construction of the Contract to be, and it shall be, governed by the laws and court decisions of the State of Connecticut, without giving effect to its principles of conflicts of laws. To the extent that any immunities provided by Federal law or the laws of the State of Connecticut do not bar an action against the State, and to the extent that these courts are courts of competent jurisdiction, for the purpose of venue, the complaint shall be made returnable to the Judicial District of Hartford only or shall be brought in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut only, and shall not be transferred to any other court, provided, however, that nothing here constitutes a waiver or compromise of the sovereign immunity of the State of Connecticut. The Contractor waives any objection which it may now have or will have to the laying of venue of any Claims in any forum and further irrevocably submits to such jurisdiction in any suit, action or proceeding.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.