Man. INVESTMENTS AG, a company incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability whose registered address is Xxxxxxxxxxxx 00, 0000 Xxxxxxxxx XX, Xxxxxxxxxxx (the “Introducing Broker”); and
Man. In-Plant. Omthera shall have the right, at Omthera’s expense, to put a man-in-plant at BioVectra’s facility to support BioVectra in achieving its manufacturing goals and to resolve any issues relating to the manufacture and supply of the Product that may occur during the Term. Any such representative of Omthera will be subject to basic training on BioVectra’s quality system including safety policies and procedures and will be required to sign a waiver of liability.
Man. The Head Clothing Man shall receive a rate not less than the highest Third Hand. APPENDIX WAGE INC. SCALE EFFECTIVE MAY Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Class Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Class May Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Tender Tender Hand Machine Back Class Tender Tender May 3rd 4th 5th 6th Hand Hand Hand Hand APPENDIX PAPER INC. WAGE SCALE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER Class Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Class November Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Machine Back Class Tender Tender November 3rd 4th 5th 6th Hand Hand Hand PAPER INC. WAGE SCALE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Class Tender Tender Hand November Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Class Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Machine Back Class Tender Tender November 3rd 4th 5th 6th Hand Hand Hand WAGE RATES PAPER MACHINE ROOM When the highest paid Machine Tender's rate has been determined, thirty - five cents per hour, per machine supervised shall be added t o determine the Boss Machine Tender's rate. May Nov. Nov. Boss Machine Tender (4 machines) Boss Machine Tender (3 machines) Boss Machine Tender (1 machine) No. Machine 158 " NO. 1400' 1449' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand No. Machine 158 " Class No. 1300 ' 1349' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand No. Machine Clas s No. 1350 ' 1399 ' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand Sixth Hand May Nov. Nov. No. Machine 189 " Class No. 1450 ' 1499' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand MACHINE ROOM MISCELLANEOUS Rewinder Operator Third Hand 26) Rewinder Operator Fifth Hand 26) Head Clothing Man Paper M i l l Millwright Roll Inspector BEATER ROOM Beater Engineer
Man. This rate will apply during the 'first year of service as a Clothing Man Helper. If work is satisfactory, a Clothing Man Helper Beginner will be promoted to Clothing Man Helper after actual hours. Occupation NEWS FINISHING Labourer Oiler Finishing, Class C Rewrap Rewinderman Rewinderman Helper Head Operator Fork Lift Operator Assistant Operator Senior Assistant Operator Job and Rate Class
Man. We believe that man was originally created in the image of God but has fallen through sin, and as a consequence has separated himself from God, being dead in sin. Man is now essentially and unchangeably unholy apart from divine grace. Xxxxx Xxxxxx We believe that Xxxxx Xxxxxx was sent by God the Father to manifest God to man and to become the Redeemer of a lost world. Xxxxx was born of the Virgin Xxxx, lived a sinless life, and voluntarily accepted the Father’s will and became the sacrificial Lamb to take away the sins of man through His death on the cross. On the third day after His burial, He rose again and was received into heaven where He now rules over all things and makes intercession for His people.
Man. We believe that Man was created, male and female, by a direct act of God, fell into sin and thereby became depraved and guilty before God; that the first man and woman were married by God and that biblical marriage is between a man and a woman only. Sexual intimacy is to occur only within the context of marriage so defined. (Gen. 3; 1:27; 2:19-25; Ps. 51:5; Isa. 64:6; Rom. 1:21-23; 3:23; 5:12, 21; Eph. 5:31)
Man. De Genesi adversus Manicheos [On Genesis Against the Manichees] gr. Chr. De gratia Christi [On the Grace of Xxxxxx] gr. et pecc. or. De gratia Christi, et de peccato originali [On the Grace of Xxxxxx, and On Original Sin] imm. an. De immortalitate animae [On the Immortality of the Soul] lib. arb. De libero arbitrio [On Free Will] nat. et gr. De natura et gratia [On Nature and Grace] nupt. et conc. De nuptiis et concupiscentia [On Marriage and Concupiscence] pecc. mer. De peccatorum meritis et remissione et de baptism parvulorum ad Marcinellum [On the Merits and Remission of Sins and On the Baptism of Infants, to Marcinellus] perf. iust. De perfection iustitiae hominis [On Man’s Perfection in Righteousness] qu. an. De quantitate animae [On the Greatness of the Soul] sp. et litt. De spiritu et littera [On the Spirit and the Letter]
Man. His direct creation in the image of God (Gen. 1:26 28), his subsequent fall into sin resulting in spiritual death (Gen. 3:1 24; Rom. 5:12), and the necessity of the new birth for his salvation (Xxxx 3:3 5).
Man. R. (2d) 83, a decision of Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench. This latter case involved a Plaintiff who had very much the same pre-existing problems as did Xx. Xxx. Issues 57 The overall issue is one of causation and the basic principles affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Xxxxx, (supra) apply. The sub-issues are: firstly, did the negligence of the Defendant cause or contribute to the Plaintiff's injuries? Secondly, what would the Plaintiff's "position" before the tort have been, or as Xx. Xxxxxxx Major put it, what would the "Original Position" have been? In other words, before the accident, to what extent was the Plaintiff impaired, both in his ability to work and earn a livelihood, and in his ability to perform and partake in normal, everyday functioning within his home and social setting? Thirdly, what is the Plaintiff's position after the accident or his "Injured Position"? Fourthly, assuming that there is a difference between the Plaintiff's "Original" and "Injured" position and since, in this case, the Plaintiff suffered from a serious pre-existing problem, was there a measurable risk that his paraplegia would have detrimentally affected his future regardless of the Defendant's negligence? Fifthly, once again, assuming that there is a difference between the Plaintiff's "Original" and "Injured" positions, was it caused by or materially contributed to by the negligence of the Defendant? As pointed out by Xx. Xxxxxxx Major at pp. 476-477, was the tort a necessary ingredient in bringing about the Plaintiff's "Injured Position"? Sixth, assuming the answers to numbers 4 and 5 are in the affirmative, then to what extent should the overall damage award be reduced, is the risk measurable or simply speculative? Seventh, was the Plaintiff's injury such that he would, on a balance of probabilities, have returned to his "Original Position" but for the happening of an event or events which occurred prior to trial but which were not caused by or more than minimally contributed to by the Defendant? I agree with Xx. Xxxxxxx Binder of this Court in the Harbora, (supra) case that in appropriate circumstances if number 7 is answered in the affirmative then thereafter the Defendant bears no responsibility. I would add that in other circumstances such a finding may only go to the question of contribution from that point in time forward. Decision: Respecting the Foregoing Issues 58 Firstly, I have found that on a balance of probabilities the ...
