MANAGING SLAAC RRP CLUSTERS Sample Clauses

MANAGING SLAAC RRP CLUSTERS. In addition to the single-processor single-accelerator per job programming model as described above, some DoD applications require more logic and/or memory than a single FPGA accelerator board can provide, and consequently require multiple boards to operate simultaneously. The SLAAC ACS API facilitates this by allowing multiple FPGA boards to work data-synchronously using FIFO channels over a local system bus or high-speed network. The Research Reference Platform (RRP) shown at right is a cluster of FPGA-accelerated workstations on a Myrinet gigabit network. The FPGA boards used in the RRP include SLAAC- 1, SLAAC-1V, WildForce™, and WildStar™. The entire system is controlled by a single host program, using the SLAAC API. This task will investigate techniques for managing and scheduling jobs on these cooperative clusters. From the point of view of the naive job scheduler, the entire cluster is visible as a single node. The only difference between this cluster node and regular nodes based on a single accelerator board is a substantially greater computational power. However, the big difference between computational resources of RRP and other FPGA- accelerated workstations may cause additional challenges in job scheduling. For example, the RRP is naturally very well suited for large time-consuming jobs, but may be inappropriate for small tasks. Small tasks would incur the same setup and task management overhead as large tasks yet underutilize the compute resources available using the naive approach. A more efficient approach is to partition the cluster as needed for the available tasks. We will investigate the feasibility and performance characteristics of sharing RRP among a large set of small independent jobs. Scheduling tasks on cooperative computational clusters brings a number of challenges in addition to the benefits. Introducing RRP as a computational node, allows the users to execute very complex tasks reserved traditionally for supercomputers. These applications often exploit massive amounts of parallelism inherent in these systems. In particular, RRP supports inter- process communication, based on MPI. Cluster applications may have complex data movement patterns among individual nodes, where I/O performance can have a significant effect on overall application performance. Unforeseen performance degradation can occur unless I/O is taken into account during task scheduling. The daemon operation will be substantially more complicated in the case of the ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to MANAGING SLAAC RRP CLUSTERS

  • Please see the current Washtenaw Community College catalog for up-to-date program requirements Conditions & Requirements

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting

  • What Forms of Distribution Are Available from a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account Distributions may be made as a lump sum of the entire account, or distributions of a portion of the account may be made as requested.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Xxxx has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Xxxx. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Xxxx (e.g. hairpinning): 1. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to any spare copper that exists to the customer premises. 2. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to an existing DLC that is not integrated. 3. If capacity exists, provide "side-door" porting through the switch. 4. If capacity exists, provide "Digital Access Cross Connect System (DACS)- door" porting (if the IDLC routes through a DACS prior to integration into the switch). 2.6.2 Arrangements 3 and 4 above require the use of a designed circuit. Therefore, non- designed Loops such as the SL1 voice grade and UCL-ND may not be ordered in these cases. 2.6.3 If no alternate facility is available, and upon request from Xxxx, and if agreed to by both Parties, BellSouth may utilize its Special Construction (SC) process to determine the additional costs required to provision facilities. Xxxx will then have the option of paying the one-time SC rates to place the Loop.

  • International Olympic Committee; International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement As instructed from time to time by ICANN, the names (including their IDN variants, where applicable) relating to the International Olympic Committee, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement listed at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/resources/registries/reserved shall be withheld from registration or allocated to Registry Operator at the second level within the TLD. Additional International Olympic Committee, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement names (including their IDN variants) may be added to the list upon ten (10) calendar days notice from ICANN to Registry Operator. Such names may not be activated in the DNS, and may not be released for registration to any person or entity other than Registry Operator. Upon conclusion of Registry Operator’s designation as operator of the registry for the TLD, all such names withheld from registration or allocated to Registry Operator shall be transferred as specified by ICANN. Registry Operator may self-­‐allocate and renew such names without use of an ICANN accredited registrar, which will not be considered Transactions for purposes of Section 6.1 of the Agreement.

  • Reactive Power and Primary Frequency Response 9.6.1 Power Factor Design Criteria

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

  • Joint Funded Project with the Ohio Department of Transportation In the event that the Recipient does not have contracting authority over project engineering, construction, or right-of-way, the Recipient and the OPWC hereby assign certain responsibilities to the Ohio Department of Transportation, an authorized representative of the State of Ohio. Notwithstanding Sections 4, 6(a), 6(b), 6(c), and 7 of the Project Agreement, Recipient hereby acknowledges that upon notification by the Ohio Department of Transportation, all payments for eligible project costs will be disbursed by the Grantor directly to the Ohio Department of Transportation. A Memorandum of Funds issued by the Ohio Department of Transportation shall be used to certify the estimated project costs. Upon receipt of a Memorandum of Funds from the Ohio Department of Transportation, the OPWC shall transfer funds directly to the Ohio Department of Transportation via an Intra- State Transfer Voucher. The amount or amounts transferred shall be determined by applying the Participation Percentages defined in Appendix D to those eligible project costs within the Memorandum of Funds. In the event that the Project Scope is for right-of-way only, notwithstanding Appendix D, the OPWC shall pay for 100% of the right-of-way costs not to exceed the total financial assistance provided in Appendix C.

  • COVID-19 Vaccine Passports Pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code, Section 161.0085(c), Contractor certifies that it does not require its customers to provide any documentation certifying the customer’s COVID-19 vaccination or post-transmission recovery on entry to, to gain access to, or to receive service from the Contractor’s business. Contractor acknowledges that such a vaccine or recovery requirement would make Contractor ineligible for a state-funded contract.

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2022-23, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2024-25 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2024, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!