Merger Costs. The legal, advisory and administrative costs associated with the preparation and execution of the merger will nei- ther be charged to an AIF involved in the merger nor to the investors. This applies similarly to structural measures according to art. 90 AIFMG. In the case of AIFs sold exclusively to professional investors, any legal, advisory and administrative costs associ- ated with the preparation and execution of these structural costs may be charged for structural measures in terms of art. 90 AIFMG. In such cases, the investor information must also state the expected costs, both in total and as an approximation per share, provided that the investor information is not completely omitted.
Merger Costs. Besicorp shall pay all of the fees and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with, relating to or arising out of the negotiation, preparation, execution, delivery and performance of the Plan of Merger, and the effectuation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including, without limitation, financial advisors', attorneys', accountants' and other professional fees and expenses (the "Merger Costs") prior to the Effective Time.
Merger Costs. Each party hereto shall be responsible for paying their respective costs and expenses relating to the Merger and related transactions.
Merger Costs. Neither any of the assets of the Sub-Funds that are part of the merger nor the Unitholders will be charged with the legal, advisory nor administrative costs associated with the preparation and execution of a UCITS merger. These provisions also apply to any structural measures pursuant to Art. 49 (a) to (d) of the UCITS Act by analogy.
Merger Costs. The Merged Entity shall pay for any and all FS fees relating to the Fund Raising and the MTI Bridge Fund Raising, whereby: a) MTI will retain and be responsible for the cost of its own legal and financial advisors in relation to the proposed merger transaction. b) K2 will retain and be responsible for the cost of its own legal and financial advisors in relation to the proposed merger transaction, the cost of the Fund Raising and MTI’s reasonable travel costs for fund raising road show(s).
Merger Costs. MANUKA shall be responsible for paying all costs and expenses associated with this Agreement and preapproved in writing by MANUKA, including without limitation, legal counsel’s and accountants’ and filing fees in connection with the preparation and filing by Purchaser of Form 8-K with the SEC and pre-ruling preparation and filing. Such payment of costs will not entitle MANUKA for any additional consideration under this Agreement, including any issuance of Purchaser’s equity.
Merger Costs. In the six months ended June 30, 1999, we incurred $266,000 in merger costs related to a merger completed during this period. COMPENSATORY STOCK AWARDS. Compensatory stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 1999 were $294,000 relating to the vesting of restricted awards to executive officers of InfoCure. These executive officers will become officers of PracticeWorks upon completion of the distribution and, therefore, all compensation of the officers has been attributed to PracticeWorks. INTEREST EXPENSE AND OTHER, NET. Interest expense and other, net for the six months ended June 30, 2000 decreased $85,000, or 8.1%, from the six months ended June 30, 1999 due to minor decreases in outstanding debt balances and increases in the applicable interest rates.
Merger Costs. The Montage Board considered the costs associated with entering into the Merger Agreement and the completion of the merger, including management’s time and energy, potential opportunity cost and disruption of Montage’s business operations. • Other Risks. The Montage Board considered risks of the type and nature described under the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on pages 23 and 41, respectively. The Montage Board believed that, overall, the potential benefits of the merger to Montage stockholders outweighed the risks and uncertainties of the merger. The foregoing discussion of factors considered by the Montage Board is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the Montage Board. In light of the variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, the Montage Board did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determinations and recommendations. Moreover, each member of the Montage Board applied his or her own personal business judgment to the process and may have given different weight to different factors. The Montage Board did not undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any factor, or any particular aspect of any factor, supported or did not support its ultimate determination. The Montage Board based its recommendation on the totality of the information available to it.
