Modelling income inequality and energy poverty Sample Clauses

Modelling income inequality and energy poverty. CGE and macro-econometric models, enhanced with a representation of different socio-economic groups (e.g. income classes) can be used to evaluate the distributional implications of climate policies. The representation of different households and labour types determines the level of detail in inequality analysis. For instance, disaggregation by skill group, gender, age and income class are relevant for distributional analysis about income and consumption. Introducing heterogeneity in models is challenging due the complex interlinkage between growth and inequality [45]. The introduction of additional households enhances the capability of conventional macro-economic models to assess income distribution effects [46] and can be implemented through the simulation of multiple households (e.g. based on income or occupation) or via micro-simulation where labour supply is modelled at the lowest possible aggregation level. Conventional CGE models represent one “representative” household, which aggregates all households of the region and is assumed to maximize its utility according to its consumption preferences. For example, the conventional GEM-E3 model version assumes that households maximise their welfare and choose the optimal allocation of consumption to different purposes. Welfare maximization is derived from the decision for education so as to maximise intertemporal income, the decision of income allocation between consumption and savings, and finally the decision on allocating the consumption over different consumption categories. The model features a distinction between durable and disposable goods and services, allowing also for “linked” consumption of disposable goods (e.g. fuels) for the operation of certain durable goods (e.g. vehicles). In the model, the disposable income is formulated by the earnings from labour and capital ownership after taxes and by other income sources (e.g. social benefits). The household decides on the allocation of its consumption over different consumption categories (COICOP) by maximising a Linear Expenditure demand system subject to its disposable income not used for obliged consumption (subsistence minima consumption). The representation of multiple households in applied CGE modelling has been long established [47, 48, 49] but it is usually constrained by data availability. There are different ways to differentiate households, but income class is the most relevant for distributional analysis. The main caveat of this approach...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Modelling income inequality and energy poverty

  • Revenue Metering The Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering will be located on the generator side of the 115kV breaker at the Xxxxx Solar Collector Substation and will consist of: • three (3) combination current/voltage transformer (“CT/VT”) units (manufacturer and model ABB/Xxxxxxx KXM-550, GE Grid Solutions KOTEF 000.XX, or other equivalent specified by Connecting Transmission Owner); and • one (1) revenue meter. The ratios of the CTs and VTs will be provided by Connecting Transmission Owner upon its review of the Interconnection Customer’s design documents. (Note: Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering CTs and VTs cannot be used to feed the Interconnection Customer’s check meter.) SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 2556

  • Destination CSU-Pueblo scholarship This articulation transfer agreement replaces all previous agreements between CCA and CSU-Pueblo in Bachelor of Science in Physics (Secondary Education Emphasis). This agreement will be reviewed annually and revised (if necessary) as mutually agreed.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Net Metering If you generate electricity from a renewable generating facility to offset your electricity consumption and/or use net metering at any time during the term of this Agreement, you must notify Starion.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING BOYCOTTING CERTAIN ENERGY COMPANIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this contract has a value of $100,000 or more that is to be paid wholly or partly from public funds, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 13 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or any wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of these entities or business associations, if any, does not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of the contract. For purposes of this contract, the term “company” shall mean an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, that exists to make a profit. The term “boycott energy company” shall mean “without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (a) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel-based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law, or (b) does business with a company described by paragraph (a).” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 809.001(1).

  • Mail Order Catalog Warnings In the event that, the Settling Entity prints new catalogs and sells units of the Products via mail order through such catalogs to California consumers or through its customers, the Settling Entity shall provide a warning for each unit of such Product both on the label in accordance with subsection 2.4 above, and in the catalog in a manner that clearly associates the warning with the specific Product being purchased. Any warning provided in a mail order catalog shall be in the same type size or larger than other consumer information conveyed for such Product within the catalog and shall be located on the same display page of the item. The catalog warning may use the Short-Form Warning content described in subsection 2.3(b) if the language provided on the Product label also uses the Short-Form Warning.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING BOYCOTTING CERTAIN ENERGY COMPANIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this contract has a value of $100,000 or more that is to be paid wholly or partly from public funds, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 13 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or any wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of these entities or business associations, if any, does not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of the contract. For purposes of this contract, the term “company” shall mean an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, that exists to make a profit. The term “boycott energy company” shall mean “without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (a) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel-based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law, or (b) does business with a company described by paragraph (a).” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 809.001(1).

  • Community Mental Health Center Services Assertive Community Treatment Staffing Full Time Equivalents Community Mental Health Center March 2021 December 2020 Nurse Masters Level Clinician/or Functional Support Worker Peer Specialist Total (Excluding Psychiatry) Psychiatrist/Nurse Practitioner Total (Excluding Psychiatry) Psychiatrist/Nurse Practitioner 01 Northern Human Services - Wolfeboro 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 6.81 0.27 8.27 0.25 01 Northern Human Services - Berlin 0.34 0.31 0.00 0.00 3.94 0.14 4.17 0.14 01 Northern Human Services - Littleton 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 3.28 0.29 3.31 0.29 02 West Central Behavioral Health 0.60 1.00 0.00 0.00 5.40 0.30 5.90 0.30 03 Lakes Region Mental Health Center 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 5.00 0.40 7.00 0.38 04 Riverbend Community Mental Health Center 0.50 1.00 6.90 1.00 10.40 0.50 10.50 0.50 05 Monadnock Family Services 1.91 2.53 0.00 1.12 11.17 0.66 10.32 0.62 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 1 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 7.65 0.15 8.50 0.15 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 2 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 8.65 0.15 8.50 0.15 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-CTT 1.33 10.64 2.00 0.00 19.95 1.17 21.61 1.21 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-MCST 1.33 9.31 3.33 1.33 19.95 1.17 25.27 1.21 08 Seacoast Mental Health Center 1.00 1.10 5.00 1.00 10.10 0.60 10.10 0.60 09 Community Partners 0.50 0.00 3.40 0.88 7.28 0.70 7.41 0.70 10 Center for Life Management 1.00 0.00 2.28 1.00 6.71 0.46 6.57 0.46 Total 12.51 29.03 29.91 9.33 126.29 6.96 137.43 6.96 2b. Community Mental Health Center Services: Assertive Community Treatment Staffing Competencies Community Mental Health Center Substance Use Disorder Treatment Housing Assistance Supported Employment March 2021 December 2020 March 2021 December 2020 March 2021 December 2020 01 Northern Human Services - Wolfeboro 1.27 1.27 5.81 6.30 0.00 0.40 01 Northern Human Services - Berlin 0.74 0.74 3.29 3.29 0.00 0.23 01 Northern Human Services - Littleton 1.43 1.29 2.14 2.14 1.00 1.00 02 West Central Behavioral Health 0.20 0.20 4.00 0.40 0.60 0.60 03 Lakes Region Mental Health Center 1.00 3.00 5.00 7.00 2.00 2.00 04 Riverbend Community Mental Health Center 0.50 0.50 9.40 9.50 0.50 0.50 05 Monadnock Family Services 1.69 1.62 4.56 4.48 0.95 1.18 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 1 6.15 7.15 5.50 6.50 1.50 1.50 06 Greater Nashua Mental Health 2 5.15 5.15 6.50 6.50 0.50 0.50 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-CCT 14.47 15.84 13.96 15.62 2.66 2.66 07 Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester-MCST 6.49 7.86 15.29 19.28 1.33 2.66 08 Seacoast Mental Health Center 2.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 09 Community Partners 1.20 1.20 4.50 4.50 1.00 1.00 10 Center for Life Management 2.14 2.14 5.42 5.28 0.29 0.29 Total 44.43 49.96 90.37 99.39 13.33 15.52 Revisions to Prior Period: None. Data Source: Bureau of Mental Health CMHC ACT Staffing Census Based on CMHC self-report. Notes: Data compiled 04/26/2021. For 2b: the Staff Competency values reflect the sum of FTEs trained to provide each service type. These numbers are not a reflection of the services delivered, but rather the quantity of staff available to provide each service. If staff are trained to provide multiple service types, their entire FTE value is credited to each service type.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.